Ontological Politics and Conservation in Thailand: Communities Making Rivers and Fish Matter

Peter Duker, Peter Vandergeest, Santi Klanarongchao
{"title":"Ontological Politics and Conservation in Thailand: Communities Making Rivers and Fish Matter","authors":"Peter Duker, Peter Vandergeest, Santi Klanarongchao","doi":"10.4103/cs.cs_129_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The lens of ontological politics explains the persistence of conflicts between upland ethnic minorities such as Karen peoples and state forest conservation agencies in Thailand. As can be seen with Karen communities in areas managed as national parks, such as the Ngao River basin, the environmental management practices employed by state agencies and ethnic minority communities enact different ontologies of conservation. We argue that shifting the focus of conservation discourse from forests to inland fish could present opportunities for both recognition of and government support for community-based conservation. We demonstrate how state forest conservation agencies foreclose other ontologies, thus precluding community-based conservation. Such ontological dominance, however, is more contested in the case of state agencies with jurisdiction over inland waters. By examining river management and conservation in the Ngao River basin, we consider how these communities make visible the agency of fish and other aquatic life through their knowledges and practices. We argue that Ngao Karen communities have demonstrated that they can account for and conserve aquatic life in inland waters in ways that the Thai state has been unable to do, thus legitimising otherwise marginalised ontologies for ‘resource’ management and conservation throughout Thailand. Abstract in Thai: rb.gy/j0ify","PeriodicalId":376207,"journal":{"name":"Conservation and Society","volume":"49 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_129_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The lens of ontological politics explains the persistence of conflicts between upland ethnic minorities such as Karen peoples and state forest conservation agencies in Thailand. As can be seen with Karen communities in areas managed as national parks, such as the Ngao River basin, the environmental management practices employed by state agencies and ethnic minority communities enact different ontologies of conservation. We argue that shifting the focus of conservation discourse from forests to inland fish could present opportunities for both recognition of and government support for community-based conservation. We demonstrate how state forest conservation agencies foreclose other ontologies, thus precluding community-based conservation. Such ontological dominance, however, is more contested in the case of state agencies with jurisdiction over inland waters. By examining river management and conservation in the Ngao River basin, we consider how these communities make visible the agency of fish and other aquatic life through their knowledges and practices. We argue that Ngao Karen communities have demonstrated that they can account for and conserve aquatic life in inland waters in ways that the Thai state has been unable to do, thus legitimising otherwise marginalised ontologies for ‘resource’ management and conservation throughout Thailand. Abstract in Thai: rb.gy/j0ify
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国的本体论政治和保护:使河流和鱼类重要的社区
本体论政治的镜头解释了泰国高地少数民族如克伦人与国家森林保护机构之间持续不断的冲突。正如在国家公园管理地区的克伦族社区所看到的那样,如Ngao河流域,国家机构和少数民族社区采用的环境管理实践制定了不同的保护本体论。我们认为,将保护话语的焦点从森林转移到内陆鱼类可能为认识和政府支持社区保护提供机会。我们展示了国家森林保护机构如何取消其他本体,从而排除了以社区为基础的保护。然而,这种本体论上的优势,在对内陆水域拥有管辖权的国家机构的情况下,更有争议。通过研究Ngao河流域的河流管理和保护,我们考虑了这些社区如何通过他们的知识和实践使鱼类和其他水生生物的作用可见。我们认为,Ngao Karen社区已经证明,他们可以以泰国国家无法做到的方式解释和保护内陆水域的水生生物,从而使整个泰国被边缘化的“资源”管理和保护本体合法化。摘要泰语:rb.gy/j0ify
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cactus Hunters: Desire and Extinction in the Illicit Succulent Trade Ecological Entanglements: Affect, Embodiment, and Ethics of Care What are the Impacts on Community Wellbeing of Social Relations in Conservation Projects? Medicine Wheel for the Planet: A Journey Towards Personal and Ecological Healing Animals and Epidemics: Interspecies Entanglements in Historical Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1