The Effect of Different Probiotic Sources on Vannamei Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Cultivation with Biofloc System

Ardana Kurniaji, Diana Putri Renitasari, Siti Aisyah Saridu, Anton Anton, Yunarty Yunarty
{"title":"The Effect of Different Probiotic Sources on Vannamei Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Cultivation with Biofloc System","authors":"Ardana Kurniaji, Diana Putri Renitasari, Siti Aisyah Saridu, Anton Anton, Yunarty Yunarty","doi":"10.20473/jafh.v12i3.37996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important component in the application of biofloc is the presence of probiotic bacteria as a floc-forming agent. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the yield of vannamei shrimp in a biofloc system using commercial probiotics and independent probiotics on a laboratory scale. The study design was a completely randomized design with 3 treatments and 4 replications, including independent probiotics (IP), commercial probiotics (CP) and control (C). PM utilized an independent formula with starter bacteria Lactobacillus casei and PK contained bacteria Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Nitrosomonas sp., Aerobacter sp., Nitrobacter sp. Probiotics were fermented 24 hours before its application to the maintenance medium. A total of 15 shrimp/aquarium measuring 3.29 ± 0.48 g were reared for 27 days after the floc was first formed. The results showed that the growth and feed conversion ratio of vannamei shrimp in the biofloc system were higher than that of the control (P<0.05). Growth and feed conversion ratio between probiotic treatments did not show significantly different results (P>0.05). Survival in treatment and control groups was not significantly different (P>0.05). The observed floc volumes which increased during the rearing of vannamei shrimp were up to 6.50-7.50 mL/L. Several types of organisms found in the flock included nematodes, phytoplankton, copepods and protozoa. The observed water quality was the same in each treatment except for higher dissolved oxygen and ammonia in the control. This study recommends the use of independent probiotics in vannamei shrimp culture based on biofloc technology.","PeriodicalId":15127,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aquaculture and Fish Health","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aquaculture and Fish Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jafh.v12i3.37996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important component in the application of biofloc is the presence of probiotic bacteria as a floc-forming agent. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the yield of vannamei shrimp in a biofloc system using commercial probiotics and independent probiotics on a laboratory scale. The study design was a completely randomized design with 3 treatments and 4 replications, including independent probiotics (IP), commercial probiotics (CP) and control (C). PM utilized an independent formula with starter bacteria Lactobacillus casei and PK contained bacteria Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Nitrosomonas sp., Aerobacter sp., Nitrobacter sp. Probiotics were fermented 24 hours before its application to the maintenance medium. A total of 15 shrimp/aquarium measuring 3.29 ± 0.48 g were reared for 27 days after the floc was first formed. The results showed that the growth and feed conversion ratio of vannamei shrimp in the biofloc system were higher than that of the control (P<0.05). Growth and feed conversion ratio between probiotic treatments did not show significantly different results (P>0.05). Survival in treatment and control groups was not significantly different (P>0.05). The observed floc volumes which increased during the rearing of vannamei shrimp were up to 6.50-7.50 mL/L. Several types of organisms found in the flock included nematodes, phytoplankton, copepods and protozoa. The observed water quality was the same in each treatment except for higher dissolved oxygen and ammonia in the control. This study recommends the use of independent probiotics in vannamei shrimp culture based on biofloc technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同益生菌源对生物絮团系统栽培凡纳滨对虾的影响
生物絮凝剂应用的一个重要组成部分是益生菌作为絮凝剂的存在。本研究的目的是在实验室规模上分析商业益生菌和独立益生菌在生物群落系统中对凡纳美虾产量的差异。试验设计为完全随机设计,3个处理,4个重复,包括独立益生菌(IP)、商品益生菌(CP)和对照(C)。PM采用独立配方,发酵菌为干酪乳杆菌(Lactobacillus casei), PK含有Bacillus sp.、Pseudomonas sp.、Nitrosomonas sp.、Aerobacter sp.、Nitrobacter sp.等细菌。益生菌在施用于维持培养基前发酵24 h。共饲养15只对虾(每缸3.29±0.48 g),在絮团形成后饲养27 d。结果表明:在生物絮团体系中,凡纳美对虾的生长和饲料系数均高于对照(P<0.05)。不同益生菌处理间的生长和饲料系数无显著差异(P>0.05)。治疗组与对照组的生存率无显著差异(P>0.05)。凡纳米对虾养殖过程中所观察到的絮体体积增加了6.50 ~ 7.50 mL/L。在这群动物中发现的几种生物包括线虫、浮游植物、桡足类动物和原生动物。除对照组溶解氧和氨含量较高外,各处理的观察水质基本相同。本研究推荐在基于生物絮团技术的凡纳美对虾养殖中使用独立益生菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Hermetia illucens Larvae on the Hematology of Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Infected Edwardsiella tarda Identification of Vibrio spp. in Spiny Lobster (Panulirus homarus) from Natural Catch and Culture In Batu Bangka Village, Sumbawa Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor Channa Marulioides (Bleeker, 1851) In Kapuas River – West Kalimantan as a Conservation Aquatic Resources Effort Benthic and Planktonic Microalgae Community in Probolinggo Beach The Application of Different Types of Diffusers for African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Culture in Biofloc Systems: Effects on Growth and Water Quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1