Comparative study on biochemical and molecular identification approaches of Lactobacillus species

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY international food research journal Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.47836/ifrj.30.5.03
Disha P. Senjaliya, John J. Georrge
{"title":"Comparative study on biochemical and molecular identification approaches of Lactobacillus species","authors":"Disha P. Senjaliya, John J. Georrge","doi":"10.47836/ifrj.30.5.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manufacturers’ desire to sell “healthy” food in response to the consumers’ desire to lead a healthy lifestyle has increased the use of probiotics during the past few decades. Probiotics are used in dairy products, as well as non-dairy items as a starter culture, encompassing a wide range of goods. Numerous phenotyping, physical characterisation, and genotyping techniques have been developed to identify probiotic lactobacilli to ensure quality management. These techniques are frequently precise enough to categorise probiotic strains by genus and species. Traditional microbiological methods were initially employed for genus and species identification. However, due to their numerous shortcomings as the probiotic ability is often strain-dependent, and that there is no way to differentiate between strains using simple microbiological techniques, new methods that are mostly based on the examination of nucleic acids have been developed. Therefore, the objective of the present review was to provide critical assessment on existing methods for identifying members of the genus Lactobacillus, together with newly discovered approaches. The present review aimed to give the most recent information on the scientific techniques used to measure and describe the possible probiotic properties of microorganisms. It will also emphasise molecular and non-molecular tools. Most of these tools are based on 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing, and employ PCR techniques.","PeriodicalId":13754,"journal":{"name":"international food research journal","volume":"17 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"international food research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/ifrj.30.5.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Manufacturers’ desire to sell “healthy” food in response to the consumers’ desire to lead a healthy lifestyle has increased the use of probiotics during the past few decades. Probiotics are used in dairy products, as well as non-dairy items as a starter culture, encompassing a wide range of goods. Numerous phenotyping, physical characterisation, and genotyping techniques have been developed to identify probiotic lactobacilli to ensure quality management. These techniques are frequently precise enough to categorise probiotic strains by genus and species. Traditional microbiological methods were initially employed for genus and species identification. However, due to their numerous shortcomings as the probiotic ability is often strain-dependent, and that there is no way to differentiate between strains using simple microbiological techniques, new methods that are mostly based on the examination of nucleic acids have been developed. Therefore, the objective of the present review was to provide critical assessment on existing methods for identifying members of the genus Lactobacillus, together with newly discovered approaches. The present review aimed to give the most recent information on the scientific techniques used to measure and describe the possible probiotic properties of microorganisms. It will also emphasise molecular and non-molecular tools. Most of these tools are based on 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing, and employ PCR techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳酸菌种生化与分子鉴定方法的比较研究
在过去的几十年里,制造商希望销售“健康”食品,以回应消费者对健康生活方式的渴望,这增加了益生菌的使用。益生菌用于乳制品,以及非乳制品作为发酵剂,涵盖范围广泛的商品。许多表型,物理特征和基因分型技术已经发展,以确定益生菌乳酸菌,以确保质量管理。这些技术通常足够精确,可以按属和种对益生菌菌株进行分类。属和种鉴定最初采用传统的微生物学方法。然而,由于益生菌的能力往往依赖于菌株,并且无法使用简单的微生物学技术区分菌株,因此主要基于核酸检查的新方法已经开发出来。因此,本综述的目的是对现有的鉴定乳酸菌属成员的方法以及新发现的方法提供关键的评估。本综述旨在提供用于测量和描述微生物可能的益生菌特性的科学技术的最新信息。它还将强调分子和非分子工具。这些工具大多基于16S核糖体DNA测序,并采用PCR技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
international food research journal
international food research journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The International Food Research Journal (IFRJ) publishes papers in English, six (6) issues a year with the coverage of: Food Science and Technology Nutrition and Dietetics Agriculture, multidisciplinary Chemistry, multidisciplinary The scope of the Journal includes: Food Science, Food Technology and Food Biotechnology Product Development and Sensory Evaluation Food Habits, Nutrition, and Health Food Safety and Quality Food Chemistry, Food Microbiology, Food Analysis and Testing Food Engineering Food Packaging Food Waste Management Food Entrepreneur Food Regulatory Post-Harvest Food Management Food Supply Chain Management Halal Food and Management
期刊最新文献
Effect of peeling, filling medium, and storage on the antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of canned figs (Ficus carica L.) Multiresidue analysis and health risk assessment of sulfonamides and quinolones from edible Batrachia and other aquatic products Modified atmosphere packaging of flounder fillet: Modelling of package conditions and comparison of different flushing atmospheres for quality preservation A 28-day subacute oral toxicity study of Apis cerana (Fabricius) honey in Wistar rats Set yoghurt processing with eggs as milk replacements, and improvement of texture, rheology, and microstructure by formulation design and optimisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1