On the Reliability of the Data on the Number of Serf Households in the “Registers” of Military Servicemen (Based on the Materials of the “Registers” of Scriveners from June 1653 and the Inventory of Peasant and Cottar Households in the Estates and Votchinas of Scriveners from Mid-July 1653)

M. R. Belousov
{"title":"On the Reliability of the Data on the Number of Serf Households in the “Registers” of Military Servicemen (Based on the Materials of the “Registers” of Scriveners from June 1653 and the Inventory of Peasant and Cottar Households in the Estates and Votchinas of Scriveners from Mid-July 1653)","authors":"M. R. Belousov","doi":"10.26907/2541-7738.2023.1-2.85-97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article evaluates the reliability of the data on the number of serf households in the “registers” of scriveners on the occasion of the equestrian review of military servicemen in the Moscow ranks that took place in June 1653. The analysis draws on the following official documents: the inventory of peasant and cottar households in the estates and votchinas of scriveners complied in mid-July 1653 in the Pomestny Prikaz and based on the perepisnye, otkaznye, and otdelnye books; the “registers” of military servicemen. The documents studied were deposited in the collection of the Razryadny Prikaz of the Russian State Archives of Ancient Documents (RSAAD). The results obtained show that the numbers of serf households in the “registers” of scriveners are quite credible. However, there are some discrepancies in the number of serf households between the “registers” and the inventory, which is due to the specific way they were recorded in the documentation of the Pomestny Prikaz. If the data of the Pomestny Prikaz differed from those of the handwritten “register”, the serviceman gave explanations “at the reference” – an oral “register”. Thus, in the considered historical sources, the “registers” refer both to the actual handwritten “registers” and the explanations given by scriveners “at the reference” in the Pomestny Prikaz. The findings may be useful for specialists in the history of the Sovereign’s Court, social history, history of public administration, and source studies of clerical documents.","PeriodicalId":486360,"journal":{"name":"Ученые записки Казанского государственного университета","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ученые записки Казанского государственного университета","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2023.1-2.85-97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article evaluates the reliability of the data on the number of serf households in the “registers” of scriveners on the occasion of the equestrian review of military servicemen in the Moscow ranks that took place in June 1653. The analysis draws on the following official documents: the inventory of peasant and cottar households in the estates and votchinas of scriveners complied in mid-July 1653 in the Pomestny Prikaz and based on the perepisnye, otkaznye, and otdelnye books; the “registers” of military servicemen. The documents studied were deposited in the collection of the Razryadny Prikaz of the Russian State Archives of Ancient Documents (RSAAD). The results obtained show that the numbers of serf households in the “registers” of scriveners are quite credible. However, there are some discrepancies in the number of serf households between the “registers” and the inventory, which is due to the specific way they were recorded in the documentation of the Pomestny Prikaz. If the data of the Pomestny Prikaz differed from those of the handwritten “register”, the serviceman gave explanations “at the reference” – an oral “register”. Thus, in the considered historical sources, the “registers” refer both to the actual handwritten “registers” and the explanations given by scriveners “at the reference” in the Pomestny Prikaz. The findings may be useful for specialists in the history of the Sovereign’s Court, social history, history of public administration, and source studies of clerical documents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
兵役“登记簿”中农奴户数数据的可靠性(基于1653年6月的“登记簿”资料和1653年7月中旬以来的“登记簿”农家户清查资料)
本文对1653年6月莫斯科军阶马术检阅中记录的农奴户数数据的可靠性进行了评价。这一分析利用了以下官方文件:1653年7月中旬在《波斯梅斯特尼·普卡兹》(Pomestny Prikaz)中编制的农民和棉农家庭的清单,以及基于perepisnye、otkaznye和otdelnye的书籍;军人的“登记册”。研究的文件被存放在俄罗斯国家古代文件档案馆(RSAAD)的Razryadny Prikaz收藏中。所得结果表明,抄录人“登记簿”中的农奴户数是相当可信的。然而,在“登记簿”和清册之间,农奴家庭的数量有一些差异,这是由于在“波斯梅斯特尼·普里卡兹”的文件中记录农奴家庭的具体方式。如果“波姆斯特尼·普里卡兹”的资料与手写的“登记簿”不同,则该军人“在参考资料处”- -口头“登记簿”- -作出解释。因此,在所考虑的历史资料中,“登记册”既指实际手写的“登记册”,也指在《Pomestny Prikaz》“参考文献”中由抄写员所作的解释。这些发现可能对君主法院历史、社会历史、公共行政历史和文书文件来源研究方面的专家有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Image of an Ideal History Teacher from the Recollections about the Russian School in the 1840s and 1850s Restructuring of Universities in the Middle Volga Region and New Forms of Work Organization in the 1930s Poetry in the Service of Politics: The Casus with the Relic of the True Cross in the Context of Franco-Byzantine Relations during the 560s Development of the Culture of Dissertation Research in Archaeology in the Kazan Governorate and the TASSR during the 1910s–1940s The Problem of the Establishment of a Legitimate Language on the Example of the Introduction of Latin Graphics in the Mongolian People’s Republic during the 1930s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1