Quality indicators for Delphi studies

Jon Landeta, Aitziber Lertxundi
{"title":"Quality indicators for Delphi studies","authors":"Jon Landeta,&nbsp;Aitziber Lertxundi","doi":"10.1002/ffo2.172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Delphi method is a technique of social research that seeks to obtain a reliable group opinion from experts. It was first created for military purposes in the mid-1950s. Since then, its use in the scientific field has continued to spread to different disciplines and aims. Despite this expansion, however, not set of indicators of the quality of Delphi studies has yet to be developed that might provide the reader—whether an expert in the technique or not—with some framework of reference whereby to gauge what credibility should be afforded to the results of the study. In this paper, following a thorough review of the literature on the criteria used to assess Delphi studies and the items of evaluation recommended for inclusion in Delphi reports, we determine what characteristics a quality evaluation indicator for this technique should have and propose a battery of indicators based on these characteristics, which should for preference be included in the final report of a Delphi study. The proposed indicators focus on three areas that are particularly relevant to the quality of Delphi research: the quality of the panel of participating experts, the way in which relevant information is obtained from the experts, and the quality of the interaction generated among the experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":100567,"journal":{"name":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ffo2.172","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Delphi method is a technique of social research that seeks to obtain a reliable group opinion from experts. It was first created for military purposes in the mid-1950s. Since then, its use in the scientific field has continued to spread to different disciplines and aims. Despite this expansion, however, not set of indicators of the quality of Delphi studies has yet to be developed that might provide the reader—whether an expert in the technique or not—with some framework of reference whereby to gauge what credibility should be afforded to the results of the study. In this paper, following a thorough review of the literature on the criteria used to assess Delphi studies and the items of evaluation recommended for inclusion in Delphi reports, we determine what characteristics a quality evaluation indicator for this technique should have and propose a battery of indicators based on these characteristics, which should for preference be included in the final report of a Delphi study. The proposed indicators focus on three areas that are particularly relevant to the quality of Delphi research: the quality of the panel of participating experts, the way in which relevant information is obtained from the experts, and the quality of the interaction generated among the experts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德尔菲研究的质量指标
德尔菲法是一种社会研究技术,旨在从专家那里获得可靠的集体意见。它最初是在 20 世纪 50 年代中期为军事目的而创立的。从那时起,它在科学领域的应用不断扩展到不同的学科和目的。尽管如此,德尔菲研究的质量指标仍有待制定,以便为读者--无论是否是该技术的专家--提供一些参考框架,据以衡量研究结果的可信度。在本文中,我们在对用于评估德尔菲研究的标准和建议纳入德尔菲报告的评估项目的文献进行全面回顾后,确定了该技术的质量评估指标应具备的特征,并根据这些特征提出了一系列指标,这些指标应优先纳入德尔菲研究的最终报告中。建议的指标侧重于与德尔菲研究质量特别相关的三个方面:参与专家小组的质量、从专家那里获取相关信息的方式以及专家之间互动的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Simplification errors in predictive models Don't push the wrong button. The concept of microperspective in futures research Science fiction in military planning—Case allied command transformation and visions of warfare 2036
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1