Comparative study between global pharmaceutical company and public institution of production and innovation in health

Kelly Cristina Rodrigues da Rocha, Carlos Augusto Grabois Gadelha
{"title":"Comparative study between global pharmaceutical company and public institution of production and innovation in health","authors":"Kelly Cristina Rodrigues da Rocha, Carlos Augusto Grabois Gadelha","doi":"10.1590/0103-1104202313802i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The technological scenario in the field of health is an alarming fact, especially in the context caused by COVID-19. In this context, the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, through the Bio-Manguinhos Unit, and the Butantan Institute were protagonists for universal access, dialoguing with international strategies. In the strategic discussion for Public Institutions of Production and Innovation in Health (IPPIS), the use of guidelines of the Technological Assessment in Health stands out as a way of paradigmatic change for the introduction of technologies in the Unified Health System (SUS) in line with the vision of future innovation in health in accordance with national demands. This article, methodologically developed through qualitative descriptive research, bibliographical, documentary and field work, sought to trace symmetries and asymmetries based on the experiences collected in a global pharmaceutical company and a public national reference institution in the field of technological incorporation in health. As a result, key points are explained for the technical and political strengthening of the Health Economic-Industrial Complex, through the organizational review of the IPPIS regarding innovation and management aspects, culminating in the promotion of improvements in the science, technology and innovation policy in response to the challenge of sustainability, effectiveness and access in the SUS.","PeriodicalId":267215,"journal":{"name":"Saúde em Debate","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saúde em Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202313802i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The technological scenario in the field of health is an alarming fact, especially in the context caused by COVID-19. In this context, the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, through the Bio-Manguinhos Unit, and the Butantan Institute were protagonists for universal access, dialoguing with international strategies. In the strategic discussion for Public Institutions of Production and Innovation in Health (IPPIS), the use of guidelines of the Technological Assessment in Health stands out as a way of paradigmatic change for the introduction of technologies in the Unified Health System (SUS) in line with the vision of future innovation in health in accordance with national demands. This article, methodologically developed through qualitative descriptive research, bibliographical, documentary and field work, sought to trace symmetries and asymmetries based on the experiences collected in a global pharmaceutical company and a public national reference institution in the field of technological incorporation in health. As a result, key points are explained for the technical and political strengthening of the Health Economic-Industrial Complex, through the organizational review of the IPPIS regarding innovation and management aspects, culminating in the promotion of improvements in the science, technology and innovation policy in response to the challenge of sustainability, effectiveness and access in the SUS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球制药企业与公共机构健康生产与创新的比较研究
卫生领域的技术情景是一个令人震惊的事实,特别是在COVID-19引起的背景下。在这方面,奥斯瓦尔多·克鲁兹基金会通过Bio-Manguinhos股和Butantan研究所带头推动普遍获得医疗服务,并与国际战略进行对话。在公共卫生生产和创新机构(IPPIS)的战略讨论中,使用卫生技术评估指南是在统一卫生系统(SUS)中引入技术的一种范例变革方式,符合根据国家需求的未来卫生创新愿景。本文是通过定性描述性研究、书目、文献和实地工作在方法上发展起来的,试图根据一家全球制药公司和一家公共国家参考机构在卫生技术结合领域收集的经验来追踪对称和不对称。因此,解释了在技术和政治上加强卫生经济-工业综合体的要点,通过对IPPIS在创新和管理方面的组织审查,最终促进改进科学、技术和创新政策,以应对单一系统的可持续性、有效性和可及性方面的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Afetividade pessoa-ambiente nas hortas comunitárias: promoção da saúde e da sustentabilidade Ambiente alimentar em um território de vulnerabilidade social em Piraquara-PR Emergências em Saúde Pública, desastres e risco: perspectivas e abordagens a partir das ciências sociais Estratégias de enfrentamento na Atenção Primária à Saúde na pandemia de Covid-19 em Minas Gerais, Brasil Trabalho e riscos de adoecimento na Atenção Psicossocial Territorial: implicações para a gestão do cuidado em saúde mental
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1