No decline in drug overdose deaths in Norway: An ecological approach to understanding at-risk groups and the impact of interventions

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1177/14550725231195413
Ellen J Amundsen, Anne-Karine M Melsom, Bjørn O Eriksen, Maja-Lisa Løchen
{"title":"No decline in drug overdose deaths in Norway: An ecological approach to understanding at-risk groups and the impact of interventions","authors":"Ellen J Amundsen, Anne-Karine M Melsom, Bjørn O Eriksen, Maja-Lisa Løchen","doi":"10.1177/14550725231195413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This Norwegian case study examines groups at risk of drug overdose deaths, evidence-based harm reduction interventions, low-threshold services and treatment implemented, as well as trends in drug overdose deaths between 2010 and 2021. We aimed to explore the relevance of interventions for at-risk groups and discuss their potential impact on drug overdose trends. Method/data: Using an ecological approach, we analysed the following: (1) groups identified through latent profile analysis (LPA) among a sample of 413 high-risk drug users collected in 2010–2012, supplemented with other relevant studies up to 2021; (2) published information on harm-reduction interventions, low-threshold services and treatment in Norway; and (3) nationwide drug overdose mortality figures supplemented with published articles on the topic. Results: High-risk drug users in 2010–2012 commonly engaged in frequent illegal drug use, injecting and poly-drug use (including pharmaceutical opioids), which continued into following decade. The interventions implemented between 2010 and 2021 were relevant for at-risk groups identified in the surveys. However, there was no decrease in the trend of drug overdose deaths up to 2021. While relevant interventions may have mitigated a theoretical increase in mortality, new at-risk groups may have contributed to fatal outcomes associated with pharmaceutical opioids. Conclusion: The interventions were relevant to the risk groups identified among high-risk drug users and potentially effective in preventing an increase in drug overdose trends. However, tailored interventions are needed for individuals at risk of death from prescribed opioids. Comprehensive studies encompassing all at-risk populations, including both legal and non-medical users of prescription opioids, are needed.","PeriodicalId":46180,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725231195413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This Norwegian case study examines groups at risk of drug overdose deaths, evidence-based harm reduction interventions, low-threshold services and treatment implemented, as well as trends in drug overdose deaths between 2010 and 2021. We aimed to explore the relevance of interventions for at-risk groups and discuss their potential impact on drug overdose trends. Method/data: Using an ecological approach, we analysed the following: (1) groups identified through latent profile analysis (LPA) among a sample of 413 high-risk drug users collected in 2010–2012, supplemented with other relevant studies up to 2021; (2) published information on harm-reduction interventions, low-threshold services and treatment in Norway; and (3) nationwide drug overdose mortality figures supplemented with published articles on the topic. Results: High-risk drug users in 2010–2012 commonly engaged in frequent illegal drug use, injecting and poly-drug use (including pharmaceutical opioids), which continued into following decade. The interventions implemented between 2010 and 2021 were relevant for at-risk groups identified in the surveys. However, there was no decrease in the trend of drug overdose deaths up to 2021. While relevant interventions may have mitigated a theoretical increase in mortality, new at-risk groups may have contributed to fatal outcomes associated with pharmaceutical opioids. Conclusion: The interventions were relevant to the risk groups identified among high-risk drug users and potentially effective in preventing an increase in drug overdose trends. However, tailored interventions are needed for individuals at risk of death from prescribed opioids. Comprehensive studies encompassing all at-risk populations, including both legal and non-medical users of prescription opioids, are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威药物过量死亡人数没有下降:了解高危群体和干预措施影响的生态学方法
目的:这项挪威案例研究审查了有药物过量死亡风险的群体、基于证据的减少危害干预措施、低阈值服务和实施的治疗,以及2010年至2021年期间药物过量死亡的趋势。我们的目的是探讨干预措施对高危人群的相关性,并讨论其对药物过量趋势的潜在影响。方法/数据:采用生态学方法分析以下内容:(1)2010-2012年收集的413例高危吸毒者样本中,通过潜在剖面分析(LPA)确定的群体,并辅以截至2021年的其他相关研究;(2)挪威关于减少危害干预措施、低门槛服务和治疗的公开信息;(3)全国药物过量死亡率数据,并辅以有关该主题的已发表文章。结果:2010-2012年高危吸毒人群以非法吸毒、注射吸毒和多种吸毒(含阿片类药物)为主,并持续10年。2010年至2021年期间实施的干预措施与调查中确定的高危人群相关。然而,直到2021年,药物过量死亡的趋势没有下降。虽然相关干预措施可能减轻了理论上死亡率的增加,但新的危险群体可能导致与药物阿片类药物相关的致命结果。结论:干预措施与高危吸毒者中确定的危险人群相关,对预防药物过量趋势的增加可能有效。然而,需要针对因处方阿片类药物而有死亡风险的个人采取量身定制的干预措施。需要对所有高危人群,包括处方类阿片的合法和非医疗使用者进行全面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
36
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Alcohol purchases through online stores and mobile applications in the late phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. Children's out-of-home placements: Associations with parental substance use and neighbourhood sociodemographics. Colliding harms of gambling and gaming: A four-wave longitudinal population study of at-risk gambling and gaming in Finland. Svenska narkotikapolisföreningens tidskrift - polisens bild av ett problem? Voluntary self-exclusion from gambling: Expert opinions on gaps and needs for improvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1