{"title":"Model of Pulmonary Co-Infection of Aspergillus and Pseudomonas in Immunocompetent Mice","authors":"Gabriele Sass, David A. Stevens","doi":"10.3390/microbiolres14040126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Co-infection with Pseudomonas (Pa) and Aspergillus (Af) commonly occurs in the airways of immune-compromised patients or in cystic fibrosis and frequently results in more severe outcomes than mono-infection. We affixed both pathogens to agar beads, separately (Af beads, Pa beads) or on the same bead (AfPa beads) and infected immunocompetent mice, an in vivo Af-Pa interaction model. Endotracheal administration was superior to intranasal, allowing larger beads to be administered resulting in longer lung residence. The CFU of the Af beads, diameter 150–250 µm, were detectable for ≤21 days. Af-bead-infected mice cleared the Af infection more than mice infected with AfPa beads, but Af clearance was the same with a combination of beads (Af beads + Pa beads). Pa-infected mice had more Pa clearance in the presence of Af than with Pa beads alone. In vitro studies supported our conclusion that the close proximity of Af and Pa (on AfPa beads) was disadvantageous for Af, whereas a larger distance (Af + Pa beads) was not. We demonstrated that the interaction between Pseudomonas and Aspergillus during co-infection can be studied in immunocompetent mice. The mutual inhibition of Af and Pa in vivo appears to be dependent on their proximity. We review the literature relating to animal models of infection with Af, Pa, or both.","PeriodicalId":43788,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology Research","volume":"346 2‐3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres14040126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Co-infection with Pseudomonas (Pa) and Aspergillus (Af) commonly occurs in the airways of immune-compromised patients or in cystic fibrosis and frequently results in more severe outcomes than mono-infection. We affixed both pathogens to agar beads, separately (Af beads, Pa beads) or on the same bead (AfPa beads) and infected immunocompetent mice, an in vivo Af-Pa interaction model. Endotracheal administration was superior to intranasal, allowing larger beads to be administered resulting in longer lung residence. The CFU of the Af beads, diameter 150–250 µm, were detectable for ≤21 days. Af-bead-infected mice cleared the Af infection more than mice infected with AfPa beads, but Af clearance was the same with a combination of beads (Af beads + Pa beads). Pa-infected mice had more Pa clearance in the presence of Af than with Pa beads alone. In vitro studies supported our conclusion that the close proximity of Af and Pa (on AfPa beads) was disadvantageous for Af, whereas a larger distance (Af + Pa beads) was not. We demonstrated that the interaction between Pseudomonas and Aspergillus during co-infection can be studied in immunocompetent mice. The mutual inhibition of Af and Pa in vivo appears to be dependent on their proximity. We review the literature relating to animal models of infection with Af, Pa, or both.
期刊介绍:
Microbiology Research is an international, online-only, open access peer-reviewed journal which publishes original research, review articles, editorials, perspectives, case reports and brief reports to benefit researchers, microbiologists, physicians, veterinarians. Microbiology Research publishes ‘Clinic’ and ‘Research’ papers divided into two different skill and proficiency levels: ‘Junior’ and ‘Professional’. The aim of this four quadrant grid is to encourage younger researchers, physicians and veterinarians to submit their results even if their studies encompass just a limited set of observations or rely on basic statistical approach, yet upholding the customary sound approach of every scientific article.