A critical review of risk matrices used in water safety planning: improving risk matrix construction

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of water and health Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.2166/wh.2023.129
Kaycie Lane, Steve E. Hrudey
{"title":"A critical review of risk matrices used in water safety planning: improving risk matrix construction","authors":"Kaycie Lane, Steve E. Hrudey","doi":"10.2166/wh.2023.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Risk matrices are used in water safety planning to prioritize improvements to drinking water systems. While water safety plans (WSPs) are promoted globally, no study has evaluated whether risk matrices are comprehensively constructed to accurately assess risk. We used risk matrix criteria adapted from previous risk matrix research to evaluate risk matrices found in 12 templates across global jurisdictions. WSP templates were found using the WSPortal website and definitions of likelihood and impact were extracted from each template to assist in the evaluation of WSP risk matrices. Application of the criteria developed from a detailed mathematical analysis by Cox (2008) revealed that 11 of the 12 risk matrices evaluated contravene at least one of the risk matrix criteria. Furthermore, definitions of likelihood and impact varied widely across different jurisdictions, due in part to the system-specific nature of the WSP methodology. To improve risk matrix construction, we recommend: setting clearer risk level boundary criteria, aligning specific impact category definitions with water system objectives, and selecting specific impact categories as opposed to defining impact in several ways. Finally, we recommend risk matrix construction be reviewed as part of the WSP process to ensure accurate identification of key risks in a water system.","PeriodicalId":17436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water and health","volume":"329 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2023.129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Risk matrices are used in water safety planning to prioritize improvements to drinking water systems. While water safety plans (WSPs) are promoted globally, no study has evaluated whether risk matrices are comprehensively constructed to accurately assess risk. We used risk matrix criteria adapted from previous risk matrix research to evaluate risk matrices found in 12 templates across global jurisdictions. WSP templates were found using the WSPortal website and definitions of likelihood and impact were extracted from each template to assist in the evaluation of WSP risk matrices. Application of the criteria developed from a detailed mathematical analysis by Cox (2008) revealed that 11 of the 12 risk matrices evaluated contravene at least one of the risk matrix criteria. Furthermore, definitions of likelihood and impact varied widely across different jurisdictions, due in part to the system-specific nature of the WSP methodology. To improve risk matrix construction, we recommend: setting clearer risk level boundary criteria, aligning specific impact category definitions with water system objectives, and selecting specific impact categories as opposed to defining impact in several ways. Finally, we recommend risk matrix construction be reviewed as part of the WSP process to ensure accurate identification of key risks in a water system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水安全规划中使用的风险矩阵的关键审查:改进风险矩阵的构建
风险矩阵用于水安全规划,以优先考虑饮用水系统的改进。虽然水安全计划(WSPs)在全球范围内得到推广,但没有研究评估是否全面构建了风险矩阵以准确评估风险。我们使用了改编自先前风险矩阵研究的风险矩阵标准来评估全球司法管辖区12个模板中的风险矩阵。使用WSPortal网站找到WSP模板,并从每个模板中提取可能性和影响的定义,以协助评估WSP风险矩阵。Cox(2008)从详细的数学分析中开发的标准的应用表明,所评估的12个风险矩阵中有11个至少违反了风险矩阵标准中的一个。此外,由于WSP方法的系统特殊性,不同司法管辖区对可能性和影响的定义差异很大。为了改进风险矩阵的构建,我们建议:设置更清晰的风险等级边界标准,将特定影响类别的定义与水系统目标保持一致,选择特定影响类别,而不是以几种方式定义影响。最后,我们建议将风险矩阵构建作为科进流程的一部分进行审查,以确保准确识别水系统中的关键风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of water and health
Journal of water and health 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Water and Health is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of information on the health implications and control of waterborne microorganisms and chemical substances in the broadest sense for developing and developed countries worldwide. This is to include microbial toxins, chemical quality and the aesthetic qualities of water.
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic resistance of E. coli isolates from different water sources in Mbarara, Uganda. Antimicrobial resistance characterization of Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus hirae isolated from marine coastal recreational waters in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Application of miniaturized most probable number method for bacterial detection in water samples: detection of multi-drug-resistant Ralstonia insidiosa in drinking water. Determinants of adoption of household water treatment in Haiti using two analysis methods: logistic regression and machine learning. Environmental factors associated with Oncomelania hupensis lindoensis snails in a schistosomiasis-endemic area in Napu, Central Sulawesi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1