Vůle a její relevance pro právní filozofii

Q4 Social Sciences Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.14712/23366478.2023.35
Oldřich Tristan Florian
{"title":"Vůle a její relevance pro právní filozofii","authors":"Oldřich Tristan Florian","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2023.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the will and related legal issues. It first discusses the historical development of the concept of will and then looks at other issues relating to it, such as its freedom. It shows the different ways in which the definition of will has been approached, and also explains how contemporary scholarship has approached the question of its freedom. In particular, the text mentions the problem of personhood as one that is related to the question of the will in contemporary legal philosophy. To be able to grant rights to someone (whether human rights in the sense of moral rights or subjective rights in general), some theories recognize as a relevant criterion precisely the will of the agent, or also its freedom. The author argues, however, that we have neither a clearly accepted definition of the will nor a generally accepted explanation regarding its freedom. This then generally puts us on thin ice when we base theories of legal personhood or laws that affect peopleʼs lives on this concept.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the will and related legal issues. It first discusses the historical development of the concept of will and then looks at other issues relating to it, such as its freedom. It shows the different ways in which the definition of will has been approached, and also explains how contemporary scholarship has approached the question of its freedom. In particular, the text mentions the problem of personhood as one that is related to the question of the will in contemporary legal philosophy. To be able to grant rights to someone (whether human rights in the sense of moral rights or subjective rights in general), some theories recognize as a relevant criterion precisely the will of the agent, or also its freedom. The author argues, however, that we have neither a clearly accepted definition of the will nor a generally accepted explanation regarding its freedom. This then generally puts us on thin ice when we base theories of legal personhood or laws that affect peopleʼs lives on this concept.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意志及其对法律哲学的意义
本文对遗嘱及其相关法律问题进行了论述。它首先讨论了意志概念的历史发展,然后探讨了与之相关的其他问题,比如意志的自由。它展示了不同的方式,其中意志的定义已经接近,也解释了当代学术是如何处理其自由的问题。本文特别提到人格问题,认为它与当代法哲学中的意志问题有关。为了能够授予某人权利(无论是道德权利意义上的人权还是一般意义上的主观权利),一些理论认为,行为人的意志或其自由正是相关的标准。然而,作者认为,我们既没有一个明确接受的意志定义,也没有一个普遍接受的关于意志自由的解释。当我们将法律人格理论或影响人们生活的法律建立在这一概念上时,这通常会让我们如履薄冰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Z vědeckého života: zpráva z mezinárodní vědecké konference Opravné systémy a opravné prostředky v trestním řízení Koncept kontradiktornosti v trestním řízení Problematické aspekty základních zásad v návrhu rekodifikace trestního procesu Využitelnost dohody o vině a trestu a prohlášení viny v jednotlivých stadiích trestního řízení Zajištění informací a věcí v návrhu nového trestního řádu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1