On predicting outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure with frailty syndrome

Q4 Medicine Kazanskij Medicinskij Zurnal Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.17816/kmj569203
Ivan V. Podobed, Nuruldin M.Kh. Al majmai, Lyudmila V. Titareva, Marina V. Silytina, Alexey S. Ponomarev
{"title":"On predicting outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure with frailty syndrome","authors":"Ivan V. Podobed, Nuruldin M.Kh. Al majmai, Lyudmila V. Titareva, Marina V. Silytina, Alexey S. Ponomarev","doi":"10.17816/kmj569203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The presence of frailty negatively affects the prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure, increasing the frequency of hospitalizations, limiting treatment options, and also increasing the mortality of patients.
 Aim. To develop a model for predicting mortality in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure, including frailty syndrome.
 Material and methods. 107 patients aged 4595 years with decompensated chronic heart failure were studied. Four age groups were formed: the first 29 patients aged 4559 years old (average age 53.94.5 years), the second 31 elderly patients (6074 years old, average 68.35.0 years), the third 40 senile people (7590 years, average age 81.54.1 years), the fourth 7 long-lived patients (90 years, average 921.4 years). A comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed using the program Optimization of care in geriatrics depending on the degree of frailty. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to select mortality predictors.
 Results. The prognostic model included 6 independent variables: age 1.05 [0.96; 1.17] (p=0.28), male gender 0.25 [0.03; 1.65] (p=0.17), frailty of severe or terminal degree 5.56 [1.08; 37.14] (p=0.05), IV functional class according to the classification of New York Heart Association 3.41 [0.60; 27.35] (p=0.19), ejection fraction 50% or more 0.29 [0.03; 2.28] (p=0.26), ejection fraction 4049% 0.40 [0.05; 2.60] (p=0.36). The sensitivity of the model was 62%, specificity 82%, prognostic effectiveness 88%.
 Conclusion. Severe or terminal asthenia is the strongest predictor of mortality, increasing the risk of an unfavorable outcome by 5.56 times.","PeriodicalId":32248,"journal":{"name":"Kazanskij Medicinskij Zurnal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kazanskij Medicinskij Zurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj569203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The presence of frailty negatively affects the prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure, increasing the frequency of hospitalizations, limiting treatment options, and also increasing the mortality of patients. Aim. To develop a model for predicting mortality in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure, including frailty syndrome. Material and methods. 107 patients aged 4595 years with decompensated chronic heart failure were studied. Four age groups were formed: the first 29 patients aged 4559 years old (average age 53.94.5 years), the second 31 elderly patients (6074 years old, average 68.35.0 years), the third 40 senile people (7590 years, average age 81.54.1 years), the fourth 7 long-lived patients (90 years, average 921.4 years). A comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed using the program Optimization of care in geriatrics depending on the degree of frailty. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to select mortality predictors. Results. The prognostic model included 6 independent variables: age 1.05 [0.96; 1.17] (p=0.28), male gender 0.25 [0.03; 1.65] (p=0.17), frailty of severe or terminal degree 5.56 [1.08; 37.14] (p=0.05), IV functional class according to the classification of New York Heart Association 3.41 [0.60; 27.35] (p=0.19), ejection fraction 50% or more 0.29 [0.03; 2.28] (p=0.26), ejection fraction 4049% 0.40 [0.05; 2.60] (p=0.36). The sensitivity of the model was 62%, specificity 82%, prognostic effectiveness 88%. Conclusion. Severe or terminal asthenia is the strongest predictor of mortality, increasing the risk of an unfavorable outcome by 5.56 times.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性心力衰竭伴虚弱综合征患者预后的预测
背景。虚弱的存在对慢性心力衰竭患者的预后有负面影响,增加了住院次数,限制了治疗选择,也增加了患者的死亡率。 的目标。建立一个预测失代偿性慢性心力衰竭(包括虚弱综合征)患者死亡率的模型。 材料和方法。对107例4595岁失代偿性慢性心力衰竭患者进行了研究。共分为4个年龄组:第1组29例,年龄4559岁,平均年龄53.94.5岁;第2组31例,年龄6074岁,平均年龄68.35.0岁;第3组40例,年龄7590岁,平均年龄81.54.1岁;第4组7例,年龄90岁,平均921.4岁。根据虚弱程度,使用老年病学护理优化程序进行全面的老年评估。采用多因素logistic回归分析选择死亡率预测因子。 结果。预后模型包括6个自变量:年龄1.05 [0.96;1.17] (p=0.28),男性0.25 [0.03];1.65] (p=0.17),严重或终末虚弱程度为5.56 [1.08;37.14] (p=0.05),纽约心脏协会IV功能分级3.41 [0.60];27.35] (p=0.19),射血分数大于等于0.29 [0.03];2.28] (p=0.26),射血分数4049% 0.40 [0.05];2.60 (p = 0.36)。该模型的敏感性为62%,特异性为82%,预后有效性为88%。结论。严重或晚期虚弱是死亡的最强预测因子,不良结果的风险增加了5.56倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kazanskij Medicinskij Zurnal
Kazanskij Medicinskij Zurnal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
553
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Features of neuroimmune and genetic profile in men with clinical manifestations of vegetative vascular dystonia of hypertensive type Features of various options for anticoagulant therapy for a new coronavirus infection against the background of obesity Changes in the level of C-reactive protein depending on the severity of localized periodontitis of traumatic etiology Possibilities of magnetic resonance imaging in visualizing the pudendal nerve in normal and pathological conditions Study of polymorbidity in patients with musculoskeletal diseases at the stage of medical and ­physical rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1