Overview of modern digital diagnostic image markup tools

Q4 Medicine Kazanskij Medicinskij Zurnal Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.17816/kmj349060
Yuriy A. Vasilev, Ekaterina F. Savkina, Anton V. Vladzymyrskyy, Olga V. Omelyanskaya, Kirill M. Arzamasov
{"title":"Overview of modern digital diagnostic image markup tools","authors":"Yuriy A. Vasilev, Ekaterina F. Savkina, Anton V. Vladzymyrskyy, Olga V. Omelyanskaya, Kirill M. Arzamasov","doi":"10.17816/kmj349060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. In modern medicine, artificial intelligence algorithms are being actively introduced, for testing and training of which a large amount of labeled datasets is required. Software for labeling (annotation) of digital diagnostic images is a necessary element when creating datasets.
 Aim. To review the capabilities and comparative analysis of the functionality of the most common available software for annotating digital diagnostic images.
 Material and methods. Five free and one commercial software product for annotation of digital diagnostic images participated in the comparative analysis. When testing the marking process on medical images for several target types of pathology, the usability of the graphical user interface and functionality was evaluated. The functionality of the software products has been tested by radiologists with over 5 years of experience. In addition, a review of semi-automatic segmentation methods implemented in the studied software products was carried out. As initial medical images, datasets of computed tomography studies obtained from open sources, were used.
 Results. Comparison of software functionality for annotation of digital diagnostic images was made: supported formats; loading, presenting and saving original images and annotation data; the possibility of visualization of medical images; annotation tools. The algorithms underlying semi-automatic segmentation methods were studied and systematized. The requirements for the basic functionality of software for labeling digital diagnostic images have been formulated. The results obtained create a systematic basis for developing recommendations for radiologists on the choice and use of digital diagnostic image marking tools.
 Conclusion. The most complete functionality in the field of segmentation of digital diagnostic images among the considered free software has 3D Slicer; in the case of annotation for detection tasks, it is convenient to use the Supervisely, CVAT platforms; for automatic segmentation of some types of pathology and organs, 3D Slicer extensions and ready-made models in Medseg can be used.","PeriodicalId":32248,"journal":{"name":"Kazanskij Medicinskij Zurnal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kazanskij Medicinskij Zurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj349060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. In modern medicine, artificial intelligence algorithms are being actively introduced, for testing and training of which a large amount of labeled datasets is required. Software for labeling (annotation) of digital diagnostic images is a necessary element when creating datasets. Aim. To review the capabilities and comparative analysis of the functionality of the most common available software for annotating digital diagnostic images. Material and methods. Five free and one commercial software product for annotation of digital diagnostic images participated in the comparative analysis. When testing the marking process on medical images for several target types of pathology, the usability of the graphical user interface and functionality was evaluated. The functionality of the software products has been tested by radiologists with over 5 years of experience. In addition, a review of semi-automatic segmentation methods implemented in the studied software products was carried out. As initial medical images, datasets of computed tomography studies obtained from open sources, were used. Results. Comparison of software functionality for annotation of digital diagnostic images was made: supported formats; loading, presenting and saving original images and annotation data; the possibility of visualization of medical images; annotation tools. The algorithms underlying semi-automatic segmentation methods were studied and systematized. The requirements for the basic functionality of software for labeling digital diagnostic images have been formulated. The results obtained create a systematic basis for developing recommendations for radiologists on the choice and use of digital diagnostic image marking tools. Conclusion. The most complete functionality in the field of segmentation of digital diagnostic images among the considered free software has 3D Slicer; in the case of annotation for detection tasks, it is convenient to use the Supervisely, CVAT platforms; for automatic segmentation of some types of pathology and organs, 3D Slicer extensions and ready-made models in Medseg can be used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代数字诊断图像标记工具概述
背景。在现代医学中,人工智能算法正在被积极引入,用于测试和训练,需要大量的标记数据集。在创建数据集时,用于标记(注释)数字诊断图像的软件是必要的元素。 的目标。回顾最常用的用于数字诊断图像注释的软件的功能和比较分析。 材料和方法。参与了5款免费和1款商业数字诊断图像标注软件产品的对比分析。在测试几种目标病理类型的医学图像标记过程时,对图形用户界面和功能的可用性进行了评估。软件产品的功能已经过具有5年以上经验的放射科医生的测试。此外,对所研究的软件产品中实现的半自动分割方法进行了综述。作为初始医学图像,使用了从开放来源获得的计算机断层扫描研究数据集。 结果。比较数字诊断图像注释软件功能:支持的格式;加载、呈现、保存原始图片和标注数据;医学图像可视化的可能性;注释工具。对半自动分割方法的算法进行了研究和系统化。制定了数字诊断图像标记软件的基本功能要求。获得的结果为放射科医生在选择和使用数字诊断图像标记工具方面提出建议提供了系统的基础。 结论。最完整的功能在分割领域的数字诊断图像中考虑的免费软件有3D切片器;在对检测任务进行标注的情况下,方便使用supervise、CVAT平台;对于某些类型的病理和器官的自动分割,可以使用Medseg中的3D切片器扩展和现成的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kazanskij Medicinskij Zurnal
Kazanskij Medicinskij Zurnal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
553
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Features of neuroimmune and genetic profile in men with clinical manifestations of vegetative vascular dystonia of hypertensive type Features of various options for anticoagulant therapy for a new coronavirus infection against the background of obesity Changes in the level of C-reactive protein depending on the severity of localized periodontitis of traumatic etiology Possibilities of magnetic resonance imaging in visualizing the pudendal nerve in normal and pathological conditions Study of polymorbidity in patients with musculoskeletal diseases at the stage of medical and ­physical rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1