Person-Job-Fit – Diagnostik und Interventionen mit dem Mini-ICF-APP-Fähigkeitskonzept bei Passungsproblemen am Arbeitsplatz

Lilly Paulin Werk, Beate Muschalla
{"title":"Person-Job-Fit – Diagnostik und Interventionen mit dem Mini-ICF-APP-Fähigkeitskonzept bei Passungsproblemen am Arbeitsplatz","authors":"Lilly Paulin Werk, Beate Muschalla","doi":"10.17147/asu-1-309306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Person-job fit – Diagnostics and interventions with the Mini-ICF-APP capacity concept in the event of problems at the workplace Introduction: There is an increasing emphasis on occupational prevention measures to reduce periods of incapacity for work. The person-job fit can be used as a basis for tailored prevention. Capacity profiles of participants in work-related coaching with and without person-job misfit (in the sense of incapacity for work) were compared with each other. Methods: 199 employees from different industries took part in three one-hour coaching sessions. The coaching was conducted by a behavioural therapist in training under supervision. Forty coaching participants indicated that they had been unable to work for more than six weeks in the last 12 months. Nine participants were unable to work at the time of coaching. Thirteen psychological capacities (Mini-ICF-APP-S) were assessed in the baseline diagnostics and the impairments of participants with and without long-term incapacity for work were compared. Results: Participants with long-term incapacity for work had more often observable problems in endurance (35 % vs. 19 %, p = 0.002) and mobility (20 % vs. 5 %, p = 0.005). In the other capacities participants unable to work did not perceive any more severe capacity impairments than the others. The coaching particularly addressed the levels of primary and tertiary (overload) prevention and were thematically oriented according to the type of person-job misfit. Conclusions: Exploration of the capacities of employees when compared with the requirements of the workplace serves as an important basis for the demand-drive orientation of an individual measure. Keywords: person-environment fit – capacity for work – coaching – prevention","PeriodicalId":53639,"journal":{"name":"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17147/asu-1-309306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Person-job fit – Diagnostics and interventions with the Mini-ICF-APP capacity concept in the event of problems at the workplace Introduction: There is an increasing emphasis on occupational prevention measures to reduce periods of incapacity for work. The person-job fit can be used as a basis for tailored prevention. Capacity profiles of participants in work-related coaching with and without person-job misfit (in the sense of incapacity for work) were compared with each other. Methods: 199 employees from different industries took part in three one-hour coaching sessions. The coaching was conducted by a behavioural therapist in training under supervision. Forty coaching participants indicated that they had been unable to work for more than six weeks in the last 12 months. Nine participants were unable to work at the time of coaching. Thirteen psychological capacities (Mini-ICF-APP-S) were assessed in the baseline diagnostics and the impairments of participants with and without long-term incapacity for work were compared. Results: Participants with long-term incapacity for work had more often observable problems in endurance (35 % vs. 19 %, p = 0.002) and mobility (20 % vs. 5 %, p = 0.005). In the other capacities participants unable to work did not perceive any more severe capacity impairments than the others. The coaching particularly addressed the levels of primary and tertiary (overload) prevention and were thematically oriented according to the type of person-job misfit. Conclusions: Exploration of the capacities of employees when compared with the requirements of the workplace serves as an important basis for the demand-drive orientation of an individual measure. Keywords: person-environment fit – capacity for work – coaching – prevention
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作中发生感情问题时用icf应用技术做出诊断和干预
个人与工作的契合——在工作场所发生问题时使用Mini-ICF-APP能力概念进行诊断和干预措施介绍:人们越来越强调采取职业预防措施,以减少丧失工作能力的时间。人-工匹配可以作为针对性预防的基础。在与工作相关的培训中,参与者的能力概况与没有人-工作不匹配(在无工作能力的意义上)相互比较。方法:199名来自不同行业的员工参加了三个一小时的培训课程。辅导由一名正在接受训练的行为治疗师在监督下进行。40名参加培训的人表示,在过去12个月里,他们有超过6周的时间无法工作。9名参与者在接受培训时无法工作。在基线诊断中评估了13种心理能力(Mini-ICF-APP-S),并比较了有和没有长期工作能力的参与者的损伤。结果:长期丧失工作能力的参与者在耐力(35%对19%,p = 0.002)和行动能力(20%对5%,p = 0.005)方面有更多可观察到的问题。在其他能力方面,不能工作的参与者并不认为能力受损比其他人更严重。培训特别针对初级和三级(超载)预防水平,并根据个人与工作不匹配的类型进行主题导向。结论:将员工的能力与工作场所的需求进行对比,是个体措施需求驱动导向的重要依据。关键词:人-环境契合度工作能力辅导预防
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin
Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊最新文献
Person-Job-Fit – Diagnostik und Interventionen mit dem Mini-ICF-APP-Fähigkeitskonzept bei Passungsproblemen am Arbeitsplatz Mobile Wissensarbeit in öffentlichen Fernzügen – Höhere mentale Beanspruchung als im Einzelbüro bei der mobilen Bearbeitung von Routineaufgaben Sitzmonitoring für Bewegung bei Büroarbeit Sichere und gesunde Arbeit in Zeiten des Klimawandels Technische Regel für Gefahrstoffe TRGS 401
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1