Factors Related to Participation in Decision-making in Emergency Surgery Patients

Roya Mohammadi, Nasrin Hanifi, Nasrin Bahraminejad
{"title":"Factors Related to Participation in Decision-making in Emergency Surgery Patients","authors":"Roya Mohammadi, Nasrin Hanifi, Nasrin Bahraminejad","doi":"10.5812/jamm-140840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patient’s shared decision-making (SDM) is an ethical standard for respecting patient autonomy. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the level of SDM for emergency surgery and its related factors in hospitals affiliated with the Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 306 patients candidates for emergency surgery in 2020. The research instruments included a 9-item SDM Questionnaire and an SDM-related factors questionnaire for surgery. Results: Our results showed that more than 50% of patients did not participate in choosing emergency surgery. Among the related factors, the SDM level of the family members, the patient's marital status, and systolic blood pressure were the main predictors of the patient’s SDM for surgery (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The emergency conditions of patients and the high workload of staff reduced participation in the decision-making of patients and their family members.","PeriodicalId":15058,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archives in Military Medicine","volume":"38 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archives in Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jamm-140840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient’s shared decision-making (SDM) is an ethical standard for respecting patient autonomy. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the level of SDM for emergency surgery and its related factors in hospitals affiliated with the Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 306 patients candidates for emergency surgery in 2020. The research instruments included a 9-item SDM Questionnaire and an SDM-related factors questionnaire for surgery. Results: Our results showed that more than 50% of patients did not participate in choosing emergency surgery. Among the related factors, the SDM level of the family members, the patient's marital status, and systolic blood pressure were the main predictors of the patient’s SDM for surgery (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The emergency conditions of patients and the high workload of staff reduced participation in the decision-making of patients and their family members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊外科患者参与决策的相关因素
背景:患者共同决策(Patient’s shared decision, SDM)是尊重患者自主权的伦理标准。目的:本研究旨在调查伊朗赞詹医科大学附属医院急诊外科的SDM水平及其相关因素。方法:本横断面研究对306例2020年拟进行急诊手术的患者进行了研究。研究工具包括9项SDM问卷和外科SDM相关因素问卷。结果:我们的结果显示超过50%的患者没有参与选择急诊手术。相关因素中,家庭成员SDM水平、患者婚姻状况、收缩压是患者手术SDM的主要预测因子(P <0.05)。结论:患者的紧急情况和工作人员的高工作量降低了患者及其家属的决策参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Long Short-Term Memory and Convolutional Neural Network Models for Emergency Department Patients’ Arrival Daily Forecasting Optimizing Emergency Department Resource Allocation Using Discrete Event Simulation and Machine Learning Techniques Comparing the Performance of Machine Learning Models in Predicting the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Interpersonal Communication Skills of Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic Establishment of a Military Field Hospital by Police Medical Workers in Procession of Arba'in: Sharing an Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1