ChatGPT is a Remarkable Tool—For Experts

IF 1.3 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Data Intelligence Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1162/dint_a_00235
Amos Azaria, Rina Azoulay, Shulamit Reches
{"title":"ChatGPT is a Remarkable Tool—For Experts","authors":"Amos Azaria, Rina Azoulay, Shulamit Reches","doi":"10.1162/dint_a_00235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper investigates the capabilities of ChatGPT as an automated assistant in diverse domains, including scientific writing, mathematics, education, programming, and healthcare. We explore the potential of ChatGPT to enhance productivity, streamline problem-solving processes, and improve writing style. Furthermore, we highlight the potential risks associated with excessive reliance on ChatGPT in these fields. These limitations encompass factors like incorrect and fictitious responses, inaccuracies in code, limited logical reasoning abilities, overconfidence, and critical ethical concerns of copyright and privacy violation. We outline areas and objectives where ChatGPT proves beneficial, applications where it should be used judiciously, and scenarios where its reliability may be limited. In light of observed limitations, and given that the tool's fundamental errors may pose a special challenge for non-experts, ChatGPT should be used with a strategic methodology. By drawing from comprehensive experimental studies, we offer methods and flowcharts for effectively using ChatGPT. Our recommendations emphasize iterative interaction with ChatGPT and independent verification of its outputs. Considering the importance of utilizing ChatGPT judiciously and with expertise, we recommend its usage for experts who are well-versed in the respective domains.","PeriodicalId":34023,"journal":{"name":"Data Intelligence","volume":"50 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the capabilities of ChatGPT as an automated assistant in diverse domains, including scientific writing, mathematics, education, programming, and healthcare. We explore the potential of ChatGPT to enhance productivity, streamline problem-solving processes, and improve writing style. Furthermore, we highlight the potential risks associated with excessive reliance on ChatGPT in these fields. These limitations encompass factors like incorrect and fictitious responses, inaccuracies in code, limited logical reasoning abilities, overconfidence, and critical ethical concerns of copyright and privacy violation. We outline areas and objectives where ChatGPT proves beneficial, applications where it should be used judiciously, and scenarios where its reliability may be limited. In light of observed limitations, and given that the tool's fundamental errors may pose a special challenge for non-experts, ChatGPT should be used with a strategic methodology. By drawing from comprehensive experimental studies, we offer methods and flowcharts for effectively using ChatGPT. Our recommendations emphasize iterative interaction with ChatGPT and independent verification of its outputs. Considering the importance of utilizing ChatGPT judiciously and with expertise, we recommend its usage for experts who are well-versed in the respective domains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT是一个了不起的专家工具
本文研究了ChatGPT作为自动化助手在不同领域的能力,包括科学写作、数学、教育、编程和医疗保健。我们探索ChatGPT在提高生产力、简化问题解决过程和改善写作风格方面的潜力。此外,我们强调了在这些领域过度依赖ChatGPT的潜在风险。这些限制包括不正确和虚构的响应、代码不准确、有限的逻辑推理能力、过度自信以及侵犯版权和隐私的关键道德问题等因素。我们概述了ChatGPT证明有用的领域和目标、应该谨慎使用它的应用程序以及它的可靠性可能受到限制的场景。鉴于观察到的局限性,并且考虑到该工具的基本错误可能对非专家构成特殊挑战,ChatGPT应该与战略方法一起使用。通过综合实验研究,我们提供了有效使用ChatGPT的方法和流程图。我们的建议强调与ChatGPT的迭代交互和对其输出的独立验证。考虑到明智地使用ChatGPT和专业知识的重要性,我们建议精通各自领域的专家使用它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data Intelligence
Data Intelligence COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Limitations and Ethical Considerations of ChatGPT Rule Mining Trends from 1987 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Classification and quantification of timestamp data quality issues and its impact on data quality outcome BIKAS: Bio-Inspired Knowledge Acquisition and Simulacrum—A Knowledge Database to Support Multifunctional Design Concept Generation Exploring Attentive Siamese LSTM for Low-Resource Text Plagiarism Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1