Evaluation of glycerol antiseptic effect on Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria

Asmaa S. Sleem, Samar S. Salman, Wafaa A. Shehata, Amal M. Dawoud
{"title":"Evaluation of glycerol antiseptic effect on Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria","authors":"Asmaa S. Sleem, Samar S. Salman, Wafaa A. Shehata, Amal M. Dawoud","doi":"10.59204/2314-6788.1100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To assess glycerol antibacterial activity against both Gram positive and negative microorganisms, detect impact of increasing glycerol concentration in bacterial cultures on extra/ intracellular Glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) concentration, evaluate antiseptic efficacy of different glycerol/alcohol formulations and monitor HCWs tolerability to these formulations to recommend the best antiseptic preparation in vitro. Background: The progressively rising nosocomial infections have enforced the need for novel infection prevention modalities. Glycerol emerges as a significant and cheap antibacterial agent against both Gram positive and negative organisms without any toxic effects. Methodology: Different glycerol/ethanol formulations were evaluated for both bacterial inhibitory and bactericidal activity against selected bacteria (4 reference and 5 clinical strains). Effect of glycerol/ethanol combination was tested by checkerboard method. Colorimetric assay of extra and intracellular bacterial concentration of G3P was done. Skin tolerance of involved HCWs was evaluated against obtained bactericidal formulations including; 80% ethanol (E80)without glycerol (G0) as group (A), E80G1.45 (B), E80G20 (C)and E0G80 as group (D). Results: Microbial growth inhibition was detected at G40E40, G40E60, G1.45 E80 and G20 E80 for most strains. No visible growth (bactericidal effect) was detected with G80, G20 E80 and G1.45 E80. Glycerol/ethanol combination showed synergistic effect against Enterococcus faecalis and biofilm producing MRSA with additive effect against Proteus mirabilis, staphylococcus aureus. Acinetobacter baumannii displayed indifference. No antagonism was detected. G3P levels were positively correlated with added glycerol concentration. E80G20 achieved HCWs maximum tolerability (100%) followed by E0G80 (92.3%). Conclusion: E80G20 and E0G80 were superior to WHO recommended E80G1.45. However, more advanced studies are needed.","PeriodicalId":18558,"journal":{"name":"Menoufia Medical Journal","volume":"301 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menoufia Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59204/2314-6788.1100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess glycerol antibacterial activity against both Gram positive and negative microorganisms, detect impact of increasing glycerol concentration in bacterial cultures on extra/ intracellular Glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) concentration, evaluate antiseptic efficacy of different glycerol/alcohol formulations and monitor HCWs tolerability to these formulations to recommend the best antiseptic preparation in vitro. Background: The progressively rising nosocomial infections have enforced the need for novel infection prevention modalities. Glycerol emerges as a significant and cheap antibacterial agent against both Gram positive and negative organisms without any toxic effects. Methodology: Different glycerol/ethanol formulations were evaluated for both bacterial inhibitory and bactericidal activity against selected bacteria (4 reference and 5 clinical strains). Effect of glycerol/ethanol combination was tested by checkerboard method. Colorimetric assay of extra and intracellular bacterial concentration of G3P was done. Skin tolerance of involved HCWs was evaluated against obtained bactericidal formulations including; 80% ethanol (E80)without glycerol (G0) as group (A), E80G1.45 (B), E80G20 (C)and E0G80 as group (D). Results: Microbial growth inhibition was detected at G40E40, G40E60, G1.45 E80 and G20 E80 for most strains. No visible growth (bactericidal effect) was detected with G80, G20 E80 and G1.45 E80. Glycerol/ethanol combination showed synergistic effect against Enterococcus faecalis and biofilm producing MRSA with additive effect against Proteus mirabilis, staphylococcus aureus. Acinetobacter baumannii displayed indifference. No antagonism was detected. G3P levels were positively correlated with added glycerol concentration. E80G20 achieved HCWs maximum tolerability (100%) followed by E0G80 (92.3%). Conclusion: E80G20 and E0G80 were superior to WHO recommended E80G1.45. However, more advanced studies are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘油对革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌防腐效果的评价
目的:评估甘油对革兰氏阳性和阴性微生物的抗菌活性,检测细菌培养中甘油浓度增加对细胞外/细胞内甘油-3-磷酸(G3P)浓度的影响,评估不同甘油/醇配方的抗菌效果,监测HCWs对这些配方的耐受性,以推荐最佳体外抗菌制剂。背景:逐渐上升的医院感染迫使人们需要新的感染预防方式。甘油是一种重要的廉价抗菌剂,对革兰氏阳性和阴性生物都有效,而且没有任何毒性作用。方法:评价不同甘油/乙醇配方对选定细菌(4个参考菌株和5个临床菌株)的抑菌和杀菌活性。采用棋盘格法考察了甘油/乙醇复合的效果。用比色法测定胞外和胞内细菌G3P浓度。所涉及的HCWs的皮肤耐受性根据获得的杀菌配方进行评估,包括;80%乙醇(E80)不含甘油(G0)组(A), E80G1.45 (B), E80G20 (C)和E0G80组(D)。结果:大多数菌株在G40E40, G40E60, G1.45 E80和G20 E80中均检测到微生物生长抑制。G80、G20 E80和G1.45 E80均未见明显生长(杀菌效果)。甘油/乙醇组合对粪肠球菌和产生生物膜的MRSA具有协同作用,对神奇变形杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌具有加性作用。鲍曼不动杆菌表现出冷漠。未检测到拮抗作用。G3P水平与添加甘油浓度呈正相关。E80G20达到HCWs的最大耐受性(100%),其次是E0G80(92.3%)。结论:E80G20和E0G80均优于WHO推荐的E80G1.45。然而,还需要更深入的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis and Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Study of TP53 Gene Expression in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Enhanced Recovery for Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy. A Randomized Controlled Study Role of Surgery in the Prognosis of Pediatric Thalamic Tumors Assessment of the Pattern, Management and Outcomes of Acute Unstable Poisoning Patients in Emergency Department of Menoufia University Hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1