Depression and personality disorders among incarcerated offenders convicted of impulsive versus premeditated homicide

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1080/14789949.2023.2262440
Adrianna Jakubowska, Anna Zajenkowska, Carlo Garofalo
{"title":"Depression and personality disorders among incarcerated offenders convicted of impulsive versus premeditated homicide","authors":"Adrianna Jakubowska, Anna Zajenkowska, Carlo Garofalo","doi":"10.1080/14789949.2023.2262440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDepression and personality disorders, such as Borderline Personality Disorder and Antisocial Personality Disorder, have been identified as common factors among homicide offenders. However, existing research often adopts a limited categorical approach and treats homicide offenders as a homogeneous group. In this study, we utilized a dimensional approach to investigate the differences in depression and personality disorders between impulsive and premeditated homicide offenders. A total of 83 homicide offenders, aged 20–74 (45 premeditated and 38 impulsive offenders), from two prisons in Poland participated in the study. They completed three questionnaires assessing depression and personality disorders using both categorical and dimensional approaches. No significant differences were found between the groups, suggesting that type of homicide alone should not guide clinical decision-making. However, premeditated homicide offenders demonstrated relatively higher levels of Detachment and Psychoticism, as well as above cut-off depressive symptoms. These findings tentatively suggest that the Psychoticism and Detachment domains may play an important role in premeditated homicide offenders. Considering the study’s limited sample size and utilization of abbreviated research instruments, a more comprehensive exploration in future studies using refined measures seems warranted. Moreover, the high prevalence of depressive symptoms as well as their associations with PD traits emphasizes the need for future studies to prioritize the investigation of depression within this group.KEYWORDS: Murderhomicidedepressionpersonality disordersinmates Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1. Although responses in SCID are symptom-counts rather than continuous, Pearson’s correlation are reported because significance of its results did not differ from Spearman’s correlation.Additional informationFundingThe study was partially founded by National Science Centre (UMO-2021/42/E/HS6/00018)","PeriodicalId":47524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2023.2262440","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTDepression and personality disorders, such as Borderline Personality Disorder and Antisocial Personality Disorder, have been identified as common factors among homicide offenders. However, existing research often adopts a limited categorical approach and treats homicide offenders as a homogeneous group. In this study, we utilized a dimensional approach to investigate the differences in depression and personality disorders between impulsive and premeditated homicide offenders. A total of 83 homicide offenders, aged 20–74 (45 premeditated and 38 impulsive offenders), from two prisons in Poland participated in the study. They completed three questionnaires assessing depression and personality disorders using both categorical and dimensional approaches. No significant differences were found between the groups, suggesting that type of homicide alone should not guide clinical decision-making. However, premeditated homicide offenders demonstrated relatively higher levels of Detachment and Psychoticism, as well as above cut-off depressive symptoms. These findings tentatively suggest that the Psychoticism and Detachment domains may play an important role in premeditated homicide offenders. Considering the study’s limited sample size and utilization of abbreviated research instruments, a more comprehensive exploration in future studies using refined measures seems warranted. Moreover, the high prevalence of depressive symptoms as well as their associations with PD traits emphasizes the need for future studies to prioritize the investigation of depression within this group.KEYWORDS: Murderhomicidedepressionpersonality disordersinmates Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1. Although responses in SCID are symptom-counts rather than continuous, Pearson’s correlation are reported because significance of its results did not differ from Spearman’s correlation.Additional informationFundingThe study was partially founded by National Science Centre (UMO-2021/42/E/HS6/00018)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冲动杀人罪与预谋杀人罪在押罪犯的抑郁和人格障碍
摘要抑郁症和人格障碍,如边缘型人格障碍和反社会型人格障碍,已被确定为杀人罪犯的共同因素。然而,现有的研究往往采用有限的分类方法,并将杀人罪犯视为一个同质群体。在本研究中,我们采用维度分析的方法探讨了冲动杀人罪犯和预谋杀人罪犯在抑郁和人格障碍方面的差异。来自波兰两所监狱的83名年龄在20-74岁之间的杀人罪犯(45名有预谋的罪犯和38名冲动的罪犯)参与了这项研究。他们用分类和维度两种方法完成了三份评估抑郁症和人格障碍的问卷。两组之间没有发现明显的差异,这表明单独的杀人类型不应该指导临床决策。然而,有预谋的杀人罪犯表现出相对较高的超然和精神病水平,以及高于临界值的抑郁症状。这些发现初步表明,精神和超脱可能在有预谋的杀人犯中起重要作用。考虑到本研究样本量有限,使用的研究工具较少,在未来的研究中更全面的探索似乎是有必要的。此外,抑郁症状的高患病率及其与PD特征的关联强调了未来研究需要优先考虑这一群体的抑郁调查。关键词:谋杀、杀人、抑郁、人格障碍、配偶披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。尽管SCID的反应是症状计数而不是连续的,但Pearson相关性被报道,因为其结果的重要性与Spearman相关性没有差异。本研究由国家科学中心(UMO-2021/42/E/HS6/00018)部分资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
An assessment of interventions following moderate and high scores on the dynamic appraisal of situational aggression risk assessment tool in a forensic mental health unit Do forensic mental health services have an ethical duty towards victims of mentally disordered offenders? Difficulties experienced by Turkish legal support officers in forensic interviews with individuals with autism and/or intellectual disabilities First steps towards a core outcome Set for measuring aggressive behavior in prisoners: a systematic review of current methods Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and PTSD in exonerees: a brief report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1