Refinement pathway for quality research interview guides: an 8-step process to refine a protocol for a complex multi-country humanitarian study

Lundi-Anne Omam, Kelli O’Laughlin, Tine Van Bortel, Iko Musa, Gallus Fung, Nicolas Tendongfor, Zara Wudiri, Mohammed Ngubdo Hassan, Alain Metuge, Yanu Pride, Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi
{"title":"Refinement pathway for quality research interview guides: an 8-step process to refine a protocol for a complex multi-country humanitarian study","authors":"Lundi-Anne Omam, Kelli O’Laughlin, Tine Van Bortel, Iko Musa, Gallus Fung, Nicolas Tendongfor, Zara Wudiri, Mohammed Ngubdo Hassan, Alain Metuge, Yanu Pride, Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi","doi":"10.29392/001c.87858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The protracted conflict in the North West and South West regions of Cameroon, and the North East states of Nigeria, has led to the closure of 29% and 26% of the health facilities, respectively. This has caused the displacement of over 2.21 million persons internally and 350,000 returnees in both countries. In turn, this has created a massive gap in service delivery, prompting humanitarian organisations and the government to use different models of primary health care delivery to affected communities. As part of a larger study, we developed and piloted the interview guides for the qualitative arm of the project since we found none exist for conflict-affected countries to orientate how to navigate the complexities of conducting quality qualitative research in fragile and challenging operating environments. Piloting interviews is important for the reliability of the interview guides to obtain good quality data from interviews. We present an eight-step process for piloting qualitative studies in multiple conflict-affected settings. These includes the development of interview guides, expert consultation, translation of interview guides, risk assessment/mobilisation, recruitment of participants, piloting interviews, modifying interview guides, reflecting on the process and reporting the pilot results.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.87858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The protracted conflict in the North West and South West regions of Cameroon, and the North East states of Nigeria, has led to the closure of 29% and 26% of the health facilities, respectively. This has caused the displacement of over 2.21 million persons internally and 350,000 returnees in both countries. In turn, this has created a massive gap in service delivery, prompting humanitarian organisations and the government to use different models of primary health care delivery to affected communities. As part of a larger study, we developed and piloted the interview guides for the qualitative arm of the project since we found none exist for conflict-affected countries to orientate how to navigate the complexities of conducting quality qualitative research in fragile and challenging operating environments. Piloting interviews is important for the reliability of the interview guides to obtain good quality data from interviews. We present an eight-step process for piloting qualitative studies in multiple conflict-affected settings. These includes the development of interview guides, expert consultation, translation of interview guides, risk assessment/mobilisation, recruitment of participants, piloting interviews, modifying interview guides, reflecting on the process and reporting the pilot results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质量研究访谈指南的改进途径:为复杂的多国人道主义研究改进协议的8步过程
喀麦隆西北和西南地区以及尼日利亚东北部各州的长期冲突已分别导致29%和26%的卫生设施关闭。这在国内造成221多万人流离失所,在两国造成35万人回返。这反过来又造成了服务提供方面的巨大差距,促使人道主义组织和政府向受影响社区提供不同的初级卫生保健模式。作为一项更大规模研究的一部分,我们为项目的定性部门制定并试行了访谈指南,因为我们发现不存在针对受冲突影响国家的访谈指南,以指导如何在脆弱和具有挑战性的操作环境中进行高质量定性研究的复杂性。先导访谈对于访谈指南的可靠性非常重要,可以从访谈中获得高质量的数据。我们提出了在多个受冲突影响的环境中开展定性研究的八步流程。这包括制定面试指南、专家咨询、翻译面试指南、风险评估/动员、招募参与者、试点面试、修改面试指南、反思过程和报告试点结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Nigeria’s surgical plan: leveraging media engagement for cleft lip and palate to drive advocacy for access to surgical healthcare Digital health interventions in primary care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review protocol Developing conceptual framework and methodological considerations in community-supported chronic disease management Using spirometry for screening and diagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases in primary health care: findings from a community health project in rural India Maternal health in cities: analysis of institutional maternal mortality and health system bottlenecks in Kampala City Uganda, 2016-2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1