The SEKO assignment. Efficient and fair assignment of students to multiple seminars

IF 0.7 Q4 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Operations Research and Decisions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.37190/ord230301
Tobias Hoßfeld _
{"title":"The SEKO assignment. Efficient and fair assignment of students to multiple seminars","authors":"Tobias Hoßfeld _","doi":"10.37190/ord230301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seminars are offered to students for education in various disciplines. The seminars may be limited in terms of the maximum number of participants, e.g., to have lively interactions. Due to capacity limitations, those seminars are often offered several times to serve the students’ demands. Still, some seminars are more popular than others and it may not be possible to grant access to all interested students due to capacity limitations. In this paper, a simple, but efficient random selection using key objectives (SEKO) assignment strategy is proposed which achieves the following goals: (i) efficiency by utilizing all available seminar places, (ii) satisfying all students by trying to assign at least one seminar to each student, and (iii) fairness by considering the number of assigned seminars per student. We formulate various theoretical optimization models using integer linear programming (ILP) and compare their solutions to the SEKO assignment based on a real-world data set. The real-world data set is also used as the basis for generating large data sets to investigate the scalability in terms of demand and number of seminars. Furthermore, the first-in first-out (FIFO) assignment, as a typical implementation of fair assignments in practice, is compared to SEKO in terms of utilization and fairness. The results show that the FIFO assignment suffers in real world situations regarding fairness, while the SEKO assignment is close to the optimum and scales regarding computational time in contrast to the ILP.","PeriodicalId":43244,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research and Decisions","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research and Decisions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/ord230301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seminars are offered to students for education in various disciplines. The seminars may be limited in terms of the maximum number of participants, e.g., to have lively interactions. Due to capacity limitations, those seminars are often offered several times to serve the students’ demands. Still, some seminars are more popular than others and it may not be possible to grant access to all interested students due to capacity limitations. In this paper, a simple, but efficient random selection using key objectives (SEKO) assignment strategy is proposed which achieves the following goals: (i) efficiency by utilizing all available seminar places, (ii) satisfying all students by trying to assign at least one seminar to each student, and (iii) fairness by considering the number of assigned seminars per student. We formulate various theoretical optimization models using integer linear programming (ILP) and compare their solutions to the SEKO assignment based on a real-world data set. The real-world data set is also used as the basis for generating large data sets to investigate the scalability in terms of demand and number of seminars. Furthermore, the first-in first-out (FIFO) assignment, as a typical implementation of fair assignments in practice, is compared to SEKO in terms of utilization and fairness. The results show that the FIFO assignment suffers in real world situations regarding fairness, while the SEKO assignment is close to the optimum and scales regarding computational time in contrast to the ILP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SEKO任务。有效和公平地分配学生参加多个研讨会
为学生提供不同学科的研讨会。这些讨论会在参加者的最大人数方面可能是有限的,例如,要有生动的互动。由于容量有限,这些研讨会经常提供几次,以满足学生的需求。尽管如此,一些研讨会比其他研讨会更受欢迎,由于容量限制,可能不可能向所有感兴趣的学生开放。本文提出了一种使用关键目标(SEKO)分配策略的简单但有效的随机选择,该策略实现了以下目标:(i)利用所有可用的研讨会场所来提高效率,(ii)通过尝试向每个学生分配至少一个研讨会来满足所有学生,以及(iii)通过考虑分配给每个学生的研讨会数量来实现公平。我们使用整数线性规划(ILP)制定了各种理论优化模型,并将其解决方案与基于真实数据集的SEKO分配进行了比较。真实世界的数据集也被用作生成大型数据集的基础,以便根据需求和研讨会的数量来调查可伸缩性。此外,先进先出(FIFO)分配作为实践中公平分配的典型实现,在利用率和公平性方面与SEKO进行了比较。结果表明,FIFO分配在现实世界的公平性方面受到影响,而SEKO分配与ILP相比,在计算时间方面接近最优和规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research and Decisions
Operations Research and Decisions OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
The use of rank and optimisation methods in strategic management in higher education Frequentist inference on traffic intensity of M/M/1 queuing system Some equations to identify the threshold value in the DEMATEL method Characterisation of some generalized continuous distributions by doubly truncated moments Relationship marketing orientation in healthcare organisations with the AHP. Internal and external customer perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1