Debt and Taxes? The Effect of Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 Interest Limitations on Capital Structure

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of the American Taxation Association Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.2308/jata-2021-010
Richard Carrizosa, Fabio Gaertner, Daniel P. Lynch
{"title":"Debt and Taxes? The Effect of Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 Interest Limitations on Capital Structure","authors":"Richard Carrizosa, Fabio Gaertner, Daniel P. Lynch","doi":"10.2308/jata-2021-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) limited interest deductibility. Using a difference-in-differences design, we show that following the enactment of the new limitations, affected firms significantly decrease their leverage. Specifically, we find that relative to unaffected U.S. firms, affected firms decrease leverage by 7.6 percent of assets, corresponding to $330 million per firm and $84.8 billion for the treatment sample. These results are driven by decreases in long-term domestic debt and by declines in new issuances rather than debt repayment. Additional tests indicate other tax reform elements do not explain the results. We also find that firms not currently subject to limitations on interest but subject to future limitations decrease leverage by about half as much as firms currently subject to the limits. Overall, our findings document an economically significant effect of recent tax reform on firm behavior and advance understanding of how taxes affect capital structure. JEL Classifications: H26; H71; H72.","PeriodicalId":45477,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2021-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) limited interest deductibility. Using a difference-in-differences design, we show that following the enactment of the new limitations, affected firms significantly decrease their leverage. Specifically, we find that relative to unaffected U.S. firms, affected firms decrease leverage by 7.6 percent of assets, corresponding to $330 million per firm and $84.8 billion for the treatment sample. These results are driven by decreases in long-term domestic debt and by declines in new issuances rather than debt repayment. Additional tests indicate other tax reform elements do not explain the results. We also find that firms not currently subject to limitations on interest but subject to future limitations decrease leverage by about half as much as firms currently subject to the limits. Overall, our findings document an economically significant effect of recent tax reform on firm behavior and advance understanding of how taxes affect capital structure. JEL Classifications: H26; H71; H72.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
债务和税收?减税的效果&;《2017年就业法案》对资本结构的利益限制
减税& &;2017年就业法案(TCJA)限制利息扣除。使用差异中的差异设计,我们表明,在新的限制颁布后,受影响的公司显著降低其杠杆率。具体来说,我们发现相对于未受影响的美国公司,受影响的公司减少了7.6%的资产杠杆,相当于每家公司3.3亿美元和处理样本的848亿美元。这些结果是由于长期国内债务的减少和新发行债券的减少,而不是债务偿还。额外的测试表明,其他税改因素并不能解释这一结果。我们还发现,目前没有受到利率限制但受到未来限制的公司减少的杠杆率约为目前受到限制的公司的一半。总体而言,我们的研究结果记录了最近的税收改革对企业行为的经济显著影响,并促进了对税收如何影响资本结构的理解。JEL分类:H26;H71;H72。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Managers’ Stock Price Incentives and Earnings Management Using Tax Expense The Efficiency of Interactive Voice Response Systems and Tax Compliance: A Field Experiment by the California Franchise Tax Board Editorial Policy DISCUSSION OF Companies’ Initial Estimates of the One-Time Transition Tax Imposed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Summaries of Papers In This Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1