Qurʾanic Textuality and the Potential of Aesthetic ( Jamālī ) Interpretation

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.2979/jfs.2023.a908303
Omaima Abou-Bakr
{"title":"Qurʾanic Textuality and the Potential of Aesthetic ( Jamālī ) Interpretation","authors":"Omaima Abou-Bakr","doi":"10.2979/jfs.2023.a908303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Qurʾanic Textuality and the Potential of Aesthetic (Jamālī) Interpretation Omaima Abou-Bakr (bio) At the other end of the spectrum from the extra-qurʾanic material and women's lived reality is qurʾanic textuality. Much in alignment with Hadia Mubarak's approach to studying the Qurʾan on its own terms, internal logic, and moral world, and with Amira Abou Taleb's overarching paradigm of iḥsān, as described in this roundtable and in her writing more broadly, I put forth a particular hermeneutical \"textual\" method that draws upon the approaches and interpretive tools of literary criticism and aesthetic theory. Applications on the qurʾanic text would mean analyzing features of textual beauty and harmony—especially in the form of elements of unity, coherence, symmetry, sequence, structural patterns, repetitions, echoes, correspondences, binaries, and counterparts—as a gateway to uncovering deeper ethical and spiritual meanings. The beautiful textual form embodies, illustrates, and conveys an ethical message, and a reader experiences an apprehension of \"harmony-in-the-text\" as a means and guide to the inner layers of thought. In other words, the process seeks a synthesis of aesthetic sense, emotive response, and reflection (tadabbur)—with a focus on gender ethics. This method of examining language, rhetorical devices, structure, and style has both classical and modern roots. Classical concepts like iʾjāz (the Qurʾan's inimitability), such as in Kitāb Ḍalāʾil al-Iʾjāz (Proofs of Inimitability) and Asrār al-Balagha fī ʿIlm al-Bayān (Secrets of Rhetoric in the Science of Eloquence) by ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī' (d. 471 H/1078 CE), Nazm al-Qurʾān (Structural Organization of the Qurʾan) by al-Jāḥiẓ (160–256 H/776–869 CE), and Sufi symbolic interpretation (al-tafsīr al-ishārī), dealt with diverse textual facets, though rarely leading to holistic considerations, such as making clear links with ethical meanings and gender justice. Modern developments and special interest in coherence-focused exegesis begin with Hamīdudīn Farāhī (1836–1930) and Amīn Iṣlāḥī (1904–97), and contemporary scholarship's revivification of this trend includes the literary school of Amīn al-Khulī (1895–1966) and Āʾisha Abd [End Page 87] al-Raḥmān (1913–98) in Egypt, initiating her work of exegesis that focuses on stylistic features of eloquence and psychological effect entitled al-Tafsīr al-Bayānī lil-Qurʾān al-Karīm (1962). More scholarship centering coherence and unity followed, including the studies of Mustansir Mir (b. 1949) on the \"sura as a unity,\" al-Waḥda al-Bināʾiyya li-l-Qurʾān al-Majīd (Structural Unity of the Glorious Qurʾan, 2006), by Taha Jabir Alalwani (1935–2016), and Salwa El-Awa's Textual Relations in the Qurʾan (2006). Currently, this scholarly movement of holistic approaches in qurʾanic studies is led and applied by Nevin Reda.1 Building on this tradition, I seek more applications of this kind of hermeneutics through what is termed in literary theory as \"close reading\" to identify textual structures and designs that can lead to uncovering a \"subtext\" of themes not explicitly stated yet embodied, implied, and part of a more holistic meaning.2 The aesthetic (jamālī) philosophy behind this endeavor is that harmonious forms embody and reflect harmonious values, and a reader is able to appreciate and contemplate this manifest aspect of the divine text—like following an intricate, colorful, symmetrically proportionate tapestry that appeals to our sense of the perfect and the beautiful. An encounter with a beautiful object—in this case, divine scripture—opens the soul to the apprehension of higher spiritual meanings. The Sufis have previously employed the classical Arabic saying al-majāz qantarāt al-ḥaqīqa (the figurative/metaphorical is a bridge to reality) in their literature on symbolism, signs (ishārāt), and poetics.3 The orientation can thus be considered a significant inspiration to this hermeneutical pursuit. Muḥyīddīn Ibn ʿArabī (560–638 H/1165–1240 CE), in his treatise Kitāb al-Jalāl wa-l-Jamāl (Book of Majesty and Beauty) composed in 602...","PeriodicalId":44347,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/jfs.2023.a908303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Qurʾanic Textuality and the Potential of Aesthetic (Jamālī) Interpretation Omaima Abou-Bakr (bio) At the other end of the spectrum from the extra-qurʾanic material and women's lived reality is qurʾanic textuality. Much in alignment with Hadia Mubarak's approach to studying the Qurʾan on its own terms, internal logic, and moral world, and with Amira Abou Taleb's overarching paradigm of iḥsān, as described in this roundtable and in her writing more broadly, I put forth a particular hermeneutical "textual" method that draws upon the approaches and interpretive tools of literary criticism and aesthetic theory. Applications on the qurʾanic text would mean analyzing features of textual beauty and harmony—especially in the form of elements of unity, coherence, symmetry, sequence, structural patterns, repetitions, echoes, correspondences, binaries, and counterparts—as a gateway to uncovering deeper ethical and spiritual meanings. The beautiful textual form embodies, illustrates, and conveys an ethical message, and a reader experiences an apprehension of "harmony-in-the-text" as a means and guide to the inner layers of thought. In other words, the process seeks a synthesis of aesthetic sense, emotive response, and reflection (tadabbur)—with a focus on gender ethics. This method of examining language, rhetorical devices, structure, and style has both classical and modern roots. Classical concepts like iʾjāz (the Qurʾan's inimitability), such as in Kitāb Ḍalāʾil al-Iʾjāz (Proofs of Inimitability) and Asrār al-Balagha fī ʿIlm al-Bayān (Secrets of Rhetoric in the Science of Eloquence) by ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī' (d. 471 H/1078 CE), Nazm al-Qurʾān (Structural Organization of the Qurʾan) by al-Jāḥiẓ (160–256 H/776–869 CE), and Sufi symbolic interpretation (al-tafsīr al-ishārī), dealt with diverse textual facets, though rarely leading to holistic considerations, such as making clear links with ethical meanings and gender justice. Modern developments and special interest in coherence-focused exegesis begin with Hamīdudīn Farāhī (1836–1930) and Amīn Iṣlāḥī (1904–97), and contemporary scholarship's revivification of this trend includes the literary school of Amīn al-Khulī (1895–1966) and Āʾisha Abd [End Page 87] al-Raḥmān (1913–98) in Egypt, initiating her work of exegesis that focuses on stylistic features of eloquence and psychological effect entitled al-Tafsīr al-Bayānī lil-Qurʾān al-Karīm (1962). More scholarship centering coherence and unity followed, including the studies of Mustansir Mir (b. 1949) on the "sura as a unity," al-Waḥda al-Bināʾiyya li-l-Qurʾān al-Majīd (Structural Unity of the Glorious Qurʾan, 2006), by Taha Jabir Alalwani (1935–2016), and Salwa El-Awa's Textual Relations in the Qurʾan (2006). Currently, this scholarly movement of holistic approaches in qurʾanic studies is led and applied by Nevin Reda.1 Building on this tradition, I seek more applications of this kind of hermeneutics through what is termed in literary theory as "close reading" to identify textual structures and designs that can lead to uncovering a "subtext" of themes not explicitly stated yet embodied, implied, and part of a more holistic meaning.2 The aesthetic (jamālī) philosophy behind this endeavor is that harmonious forms embody and reflect harmonious values, and a reader is able to appreciate and contemplate this manifest aspect of the divine text—like following an intricate, colorful, symmetrically proportionate tapestry that appeals to our sense of the perfect and the beautiful. An encounter with a beautiful object—in this case, divine scripture—opens the soul to the apprehension of higher spiritual meanings. The Sufis have previously employed the classical Arabic saying al-majāz qantarāt al-ḥaqīqa (the figurative/metaphorical is a bridge to reality) in their literature on symbolism, signs (ishārāt), and poetics.3 The orientation can thus be considered a significant inspiration to this hermeneutical pursuit. Muḥyīddīn Ibn ʿArabī (560–638 H/1165–1240 CE), in his treatise Kitāb al-Jalāl wa-l-Jamāl (Book of Majesty and Beauty) composed in 602...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《古兰经》的文本性和审美的潜力(Jamālī)解释
《古兰经》的文本性和审美的潜力(Jamālī)解释奥玛玛·阿布·巴克尔(bio)在《古兰经》之外的材料和女性生活现实的另一端是《古兰经》的文本性。与Hadia Mubarak研究《古兰经》自身条件、内在逻辑和道德世界的方法,以及Amira Abou Taleb的iḥsān总体范式非常一致,正如在这次圆桌会议和她更广泛的写作中所描述的那样,我提出了一种特殊的解释学“文本”方法,该方法利用了文学批评和美学理论的方法和解释工具。在古兰经文本上的应用意味着分析文本的美与和谐的特征——特别是以统一、连贯、对称、顺序、结构模式、重复、呼应、对应、二元和对应物等元素的形式——作为揭示更深层次的伦理和精神意义的门户。优美的文本形式体现、阐释和传达了一种伦理信息,读者体验到一种对“文本和谐”的理解,这是一种通往思想内层的手段和指南。换句话说,这个过程寻求审美、情感反应和反思(tadabbur)的综合——重点是性别伦理。这种考察语言、修辞手段、结构和风格的方法既有古典的根源,也有现代的根源。古典概念就像我ʾjāz(《ʾ的不可模仿性),如在装备ābḌalāʾil al-Iʾjāz(不可模仿性的证明)和Asrār al-Balagha fīʿIlm al-Bayān(雄辩的言辞在科学的秘密),ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī’(471 d。H /公元1078年),Nazm al-Qurʾān(结构组织的《ʾ)al-Jāḥ我ẓ(160 - 256 H / 776 -公元869年),和苏菲象征性解释(al-tafsīr al-ishārī),不同的文本处理方面,虽然很少导致整体考虑,比如与伦理意义和性别正义建立明确的联系。现代发展和对以连贯为中心的释经的特殊兴趣始于ham dud n Farāhī(1836-1930)和am n Iṣlāḥī(1904-97),当代学者对这一趋势的复兴包括埃及的am n al- khuli(1895-1966)和Ā al- isha Abd [End Page 87] al-Raḥmān(1913-98)的文学流派,开始了她的释经工作,专注于口才和心理效果的风格特征,名为al- tafs r al-Bayānī il- qur r ān al- kar m(1962)。随后出现了更多以一致性和统一性为中心的学术研究,包括Mustansir Mir (b. 1949)对“篇章作为一个统一体”的研究,al-Waḥda al- binir iyya li-l-Qur ā ān al- majmajd(《荣耀的古兰经的结构统一性》,2006),Taha Jabir Alalwani(1935-2016)的研究,以及Salwa El-Awa的《古兰经中的文本关系》(2006)。目前,这种整体方法在古兰经研究中的学术运动是由Nevin reda领导和应用的。1基于这一传统,我寻求这种解释学的更多应用,通过文学理论中所谓的“细读”来识别文本结构和设计,这些结构和设计可以揭示主题的“潜文本”,这些主题没有明确说明,但具体体现,暗示,并且是更整体意义的一部分这种努力背后的美学(jamālī)哲学是,和谐的形式体现和反映了和谐的价值观,读者能够欣赏和思考神圣文本的这一明显方面,就像追随一幅复杂的、丰富多彩的、对称比例的挂毯,吸引着我们对完美和美丽的感觉。与美丽的事物相遇——在这种情况下,是神圣的经文——开启了灵魂对更高精神意义的理解。苏菲派以前在他们关于象征主义、符号(ishārāt)和诗学的文献中使用了古典阿拉伯语al-majāz qantarāt al-ḥaqīqa(比喻/隐喻是通向现实的桥梁)因此,这种取向可以被认为是对这种解释学追求的重要启发。Muḥyīddīn伊本·阿拉比(公元560-638 H/公元1165-1240),在他602年撰写的论文Kitāb al-Jalāl wa-l-Jamāl(《威严与美丽之书》)中……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, the oldest interdisciplinary, inter-religious feminist academic journal in religious studies, is a channel for the publication of feminist scholarship in religion and a forum for discussion and dialogue among women and men of differing feminist perspectives. Active electronic and combined electronic/print subscriptions to this journal include access to the online backrun.
期刊最新文献
Gender-Based Research in Qur'anic Studies: Concluding Remarks Decolonizing the Body, Pedagogies, and Anti-Asian Hate Extra-Qurʾanic Sources and Gender-Just Hermeneutics Moving from Male-Centric Fallacies to Feminist Interpretive Authority Raising the Moral Bar: Reaching for the Beauty and Goodness of Iḥsān
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1