Effects of Six-Week Pre-Season Complex Contrast Training Intervention on Male Soccer Players’ Athletic Performance

Q3 Health Professions Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.2478/pjst-2023-0017
Gopal Kumar, Vivek Pandey, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Rohit K. Thapa
{"title":"Effects of Six-Week Pre-Season Complex Contrast Training Intervention on Male Soccer Players’ Athletic Performance","authors":"Gopal Kumar, Vivek Pandey, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Rohit K. Thapa","doi":"10.2478/pjst-2023-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a six-week complex contrast training (CCT) intervention on the athletic performance of highly-trained amateur male soccer players during the pre-season period. Material and Methods. Participants aged 21.3 were randomized to CCT (n = 7) or active (i.e. standard soccer training) control (CG; n = 9) groups. Athletic performance was assessed using the 30 m linear sprint test time, standing long jump distance (SLJ), countermovement jump (CMJ) height, and unilateral right-left knee flexion and extension isokinetic maximal strength tests. The experimental group replaced part of the standard soccer training schedule with three CCT sessions per week for six weeks. A two (pre-post intervention) by two (CCT, CG) mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the exercise-specific effects. In addition, between-group comparisons at post-test were conducted with baseline scores as covariate. Within group changes were analyzed using paired t-test. Results. Significant group-by-time interaction effects were found for all dependent variables (p < 0.001 – 0.004). Post-hoc tests using paired t-test revealed significant improvements in all dependent variables in CCT (all p ≤ 0.001; effect size (g) = 0.29 – 0.96; %Δ = 4.5 – 14.7), but not in CG (p = 0.174 – 0.633; g = 0.03 – 0.20; %Δ = 0.4 – 2.6). Further, Bonferroni adjusted post-hoc analysis using baseline scores as a covariate showed post-test differences in favor of CCT compared to CG for all variables. Conclusions. CCT is recommended as an effective training strategy during the pre-season to improve athletic performance among highly-trained amateur male soccer players.","PeriodicalId":37359,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjst-2023-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a six-week complex contrast training (CCT) intervention on the athletic performance of highly-trained amateur male soccer players during the pre-season period. Material and Methods. Participants aged 21.3 were randomized to CCT (n = 7) or active (i.e. standard soccer training) control (CG; n = 9) groups. Athletic performance was assessed using the 30 m linear sprint test time, standing long jump distance (SLJ), countermovement jump (CMJ) height, and unilateral right-left knee flexion and extension isokinetic maximal strength tests. The experimental group replaced part of the standard soccer training schedule with three CCT sessions per week for six weeks. A two (pre-post intervention) by two (CCT, CG) mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the exercise-specific effects. In addition, between-group comparisons at post-test were conducted with baseline scores as covariate. Within group changes were analyzed using paired t-test. Results. Significant group-by-time interaction effects were found for all dependent variables (p < 0.001 – 0.004). Post-hoc tests using paired t-test revealed significant improvements in all dependent variables in CCT (all p ≤ 0.001; effect size (g) = 0.29 – 0.96; %Δ = 4.5 – 14.7), but not in CG (p = 0.174 – 0.633; g = 0.03 – 0.20; %Δ = 0.4 – 2.6). Further, Bonferroni adjusted post-hoc analysis using baseline scores as a covariate showed post-test differences in favor of CCT compared to CG for all variables. Conclusions. CCT is recommended as an effective training strategy during the pre-season to improve athletic performance among highly-trained amateur male soccer players.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
六周季前复杂对比训练干预对男子足球运动员运动成绩的影响
摘要介绍。本研究旨在探讨为期六周的复杂对比训练(CCT)干预对训练有素的业余男子足球运动员季前运动表现的影响。材料和方法。年龄21.3岁的参与者被随机分配到CCT (n = 7)或积极(即标准足球训练)对照组(CG;N = 9)组。采用30米直线冲刺测试时间、立定跳远距离(SLJ)、反动作跳跃(CMJ)高度和单侧左右膝关节屈伸等速最大力量测试对运动成绩进行评价。实验组将部分标准足球训练计划改为每周三次CCT,持续六周。采用双(干预前后)双(CCT, CG)混合方差分析分析运动特异性效果。此外,以基线分数作为协变量进行后测组间比较。组内变化采用配对t检验分析。结果。所有因变量均存在显著的群体-时间交互效应(p <0.001 - 0.004)。采用配对t检验的事后检验显示,CCT的所有因变量均有显著改善(均p≤0.001;效应量(g) = 0.29 - 0.96;%Δ = 4.5 - 14.7),但CG没有(p = 0.174 - 0.633;G = 0.03 ~ 0.20;%Δ = 0.4 - 2.6)。此外,Bonferroni调整了使用基线分数作为协变量的事后分析,结果显示,与CG相比,所有变量的后测试差异都有利于CCT。结论。CCT被推荐为赛季前有效的训练策略,以提高训练有素的业余男子足球运动员的运动表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism
Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lipid Profile of Youth Sport Climbers: A Preliminary Investigation Mountaineering in the Himalayas: A Comprehensive Analysis Through a Literature Review and Research Profiling Effects of Ashwagandha (Withania Somnifera) Supplementation on Body Composition and Blood Health Indices in Professional Wrestlers Evaluation of Balance and Muscle Strength of Upper and Lower Limbs in Rock Climbers Wavelet Analysis of Rearfoot Loading of Patients After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) Reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1