{"title":"Körper, Kannibalen, Judenräte, Ästhetiken des Grotesken bei George Tabori und Robert Schindel by Johanna Öttl (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a906971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Körper, Kannibalen, Judenräte, Ästhetiken des Grotesken bei George Tabori und Robert Schindel by Johanna Öttl Timothy B. Malchow Johanna Öttl, Körper, Kannibalen, Judenräte, Ästhetiken des Grotesken bei George Tabori und Robert Schindel. Literaturgeschichte in Studien und Quellen 32. Vienna: Böhlau, 2022. 337 pp. This excellent book by Johanna Öttl, focuses on contextualized analyses of two plays exploring memory of the Shoah: Die Kannibalen by George Tabori (1914–2007) and Dunkelstein by Robert Schindel (b. 1944). The 1969 German premiere of Die Kannibalen in West Berlin launched Tabori's career in German-language theater; Schindel's Dunkelstein was published in 2010 and had its full-length premiere in Vienna in 2016. A generation separates the two playwrights, though each, from an assimilated Jewish family, lost his father to murder by Nazis in the Shoah. Öttl shows that each writer produced an innovative play at a transitional moment for Holocaust memory and its literary representation, employing a grotesque aesthetic that deviated from established genres to expose the constructedness of conventions for representing memory. The book consists of four chapters with a brief introduction and a helpful conclusion. The first chapter examines the contexts in which Die Kannibalen and Dunkelstein appeared, distinguishing between public memory discourses and memory-focused literary genres while tracing their interactions through numerous examples. After a postwar period characterized by distortions, silence, and the coexistence of anti- and philosemitism that dehistoricized and sentimentalized Jewish figures, the 1960s marked a transition. Growing interest in survivor testimony led to the perception of individual survivors' bodies as authoritative markers of authentic memory and to a new focus on their voices. In Die Kannibalen, the emphasis on complex, individual Jewish protagonists grew out of that development, breaking taboos by undermining the impersonal cliché of sacralized victimhood. Öttl shows that sentimentalizing [End Page 125] and dehistoricizing tendencies have continued into the new millennium in popular Shoah representations, although survivor literature and testimony had also become central in public memory by the 1980s. Given the meaning attributed to survivors' bodies and voices, a new form of memory is emerging as the last survivors die out, leaving only mediated representations of their bodies and voices as signs of authentic memory. Schindel's play thematizes this shift from communicative to cultural memory. In the second chapter, Öttl formulates her critical understanding of the grotesque aesthetics at work in Tabori and Schindel. She dismisses Wolfgang Kayser's canonical 1957 study of the grotesque for its emphasis on timeless tropes, arguing instead that an aesthetic becomes grotesque in context, in relation to generic forms that it juxtaposes in an alienating, multi-voiced narrative that might be comical. The dialogic nature of such narratives engenders reflection on how familiar literary genres construct modes of perception and thought (subject positions) and how genres interact with societal discourses that form conceptions of reality. Öttl builds on Mikhail Bakhtin's discussion of the grotesque. Although Bakhtin is renowned for conceptualizing the carnivalesque in his Rabelais study, his work on the dialogic artwork, beginning with his Dostoyevsky study, proves more important for Öttl's understanding of grotesque aesthetics. Chapter 3 examines Die Kannibalen, demonstrating the novelty for its time of Tabori's prioritization of the subjective voices and corporeal sensations of individual Shoah survivors. Öttl engages in close reading of the play while relating it to Tabori's prior work, some of his later plays, scholarship on the author, and other Shoah literature, underscoring the significance of Die Kannibalen in its moment. Considering the play's aesthetic innovations as a piece of Shoah literature alongside its references to societal discourses, she shows that it breaks with conventional philosemitic representations of Shoah survivors while also engaging older antisemitic tropes like that of Jews as cannibals. Die Kannibalen introduces survivors as autonomous speakers while employing alienation and comical elements to undermine discursive conventions. Most importantly, it introduces survivors' bodies as primary bearers of memory. Schindel's Dunkelstein is the focus of Chapter 4. The play's fictional title character is based on the historical Benjamin Murmelstein, a rabbi who survived the Shoah as the Jewish council elder in the Theresienstadt concentration camp. Öttl relates Schindel's play to other...","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Austrian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a906971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reviewed by: Körper, Kannibalen, Judenräte, Ästhetiken des Grotesken bei George Tabori und Robert Schindel by Johanna Öttl Timothy B. Malchow Johanna Öttl, Körper, Kannibalen, Judenräte, Ästhetiken des Grotesken bei George Tabori und Robert Schindel. Literaturgeschichte in Studien und Quellen 32. Vienna: Böhlau, 2022. 337 pp. This excellent book by Johanna Öttl, focuses on contextualized analyses of two plays exploring memory of the Shoah: Die Kannibalen by George Tabori (1914–2007) and Dunkelstein by Robert Schindel (b. 1944). The 1969 German premiere of Die Kannibalen in West Berlin launched Tabori's career in German-language theater; Schindel's Dunkelstein was published in 2010 and had its full-length premiere in Vienna in 2016. A generation separates the two playwrights, though each, from an assimilated Jewish family, lost his father to murder by Nazis in the Shoah. Öttl shows that each writer produced an innovative play at a transitional moment for Holocaust memory and its literary representation, employing a grotesque aesthetic that deviated from established genres to expose the constructedness of conventions for representing memory. The book consists of four chapters with a brief introduction and a helpful conclusion. The first chapter examines the contexts in which Die Kannibalen and Dunkelstein appeared, distinguishing between public memory discourses and memory-focused literary genres while tracing their interactions through numerous examples. After a postwar period characterized by distortions, silence, and the coexistence of anti- and philosemitism that dehistoricized and sentimentalized Jewish figures, the 1960s marked a transition. Growing interest in survivor testimony led to the perception of individual survivors' bodies as authoritative markers of authentic memory and to a new focus on their voices. In Die Kannibalen, the emphasis on complex, individual Jewish protagonists grew out of that development, breaking taboos by undermining the impersonal cliché of sacralized victimhood. Öttl shows that sentimentalizing [End Page 125] and dehistoricizing tendencies have continued into the new millennium in popular Shoah representations, although survivor literature and testimony had also become central in public memory by the 1980s. Given the meaning attributed to survivors' bodies and voices, a new form of memory is emerging as the last survivors die out, leaving only mediated representations of their bodies and voices as signs of authentic memory. Schindel's play thematizes this shift from communicative to cultural memory. In the second chapter, Öttl formulates her critical understanding of the grotesque aesthetics at work in Tabori and Schindel. She dismisses Wolfgang Kayser's canonical 1957 study of the grotesque for its emphasis on timeless tropes, arguing instead that an aesthetic becomes grotesque in context, in relation to generic forms that it juxtaposes in an alienating, multi-voiced narrative that might be comical. The dialogic nature of such narratives engenders reflection on how familiar literary genres construct modes of perception and thought (subject positions) and how genres interact with societal discourses that form conceptions of reality. Öttl builds on Mikhail Bakhtin's discussion of the grotesque. Although Bakhtin is renowned for conceptualizing the carnivalesque in his Rabelais study, his work on the dialogic artwork, beginning with his Dostoyevsky study, proves more important for Öttl's understanding of grotesque aesthetics. Chapter 3 examines Die Kannibalen, demonstrating the novelty for its time of Tabori's prioritization of the subjective voices and corporeal sensations of individual Shoah survivors. Öttl engages in close reading of the play while relating it to Tabori's prior work, some of his later plays, scholarship on the author, and other Shoah literature, underscoring the significance of Die Kannibalen in its moment. Considering the play's aesthetic innovations as a piece of Shoah literature alongside its references to societal discourses, she shows that it breaks with conventional philosemitic representations of Shoah survivors while also engaging older antisemitic tropes like that of Jews as cannibals. Die Kannibalen introduces survivors as autonomous speakers while employing alienation and comical elements to undermine discursive conventions. Most importantly, it introduces survivors' bodies as primary bearers of memory. Schindel's Dunkelstein is the focus of Chapter 4. The play's fictional title character is based on the historical Benjamin Murmelstein, a rabbi who survived the Shoah as the Jewish council elder in the Theresienstadt concentration camp. Öttl relates Schindel's play to other...
审查:Körper, Kannibalen, Judenräte, Ästhetiken des Grotesken bei George Tabori和Robert Schindel by Johanna Öttl Timothy B. Malchow Johanna Öttl, Körper, Kannibalen, Judenräte, Ästhetiken des Grotesken bei George Tabori和Robert Schindel。文学在学生和Quellen中的应用32。维也纳:Böhlau, 2022。337页。这本优秀的书由约翰娜Öttl,侧重于两部戏剧的情境化分析,探索大屠杀的记忆:乔治·塔博里(1914-2007)的《Kannibalen》和罗伯特·辛德尔(1944年)的《Dunkelstein》。1969年,《坎尼巴伦》在西柏林的德国首演开启了塔波里在德语戏剧领域的职业生涯;辛德尔的《敦克尔斯坦》于2010年出版,2016年在维也纳首演。这两位剧作家只隔了一代人,尽管他们都来自一个被同化的犹太家庭,父亲在大屠杀中被纳粹杀害。Öttl显示,每位作家都在大屠杀记忆及其文学表现的过渡时期创作了一部创新的戏剧,采用了偏离既定流派的怪诞美学,揭示了表现记忆的惯例的结构性。这本书由四章组成,有一个简短的介绍和一个有益的结论。第一章考察了《Kannibalen》和《Dunkelstein》出现的语境,区分了公共记忆话语和以记忆为中心的文学类型,并通过许多例子追踪了它们之间的相互作用。战后的一段时期以扭曲、沉默、反犹太主义和反犹太主义并存为特征,这些反犹太主义和反犹太主义将犹太人去历史化、感伤化,1960年代标志着一个转变。对幸存者证词的兴趣日益浓厚,导致人们将幸存者的身体视为真实记忆的权威标志,并重新关注他们的声音。在《Kannibalen》中,对复杂的、个体的犹太主角的强调源于这种发展,通过破坏神圣的受害者身份的非个人陈词滥调来打破禁忌。Öttl表明,尽管幸存者的文学和证词在20世纪80年代也成为公众记忆的中心,但在流行的大屠杀再现中,煽情化和去历史化的倾向一直持续到新千年。考虑到幸存者身体和声音的意义,随着最后一批幸存者的死亡,一种新的记忆形式正在出现,只留下他们身体和声音的中介代表作为真实记忆的标志。辛德尔的戏剧将这种从交际到文化记忆的转变作为主题。在第二章中,Öttl阐述了她对塔里和辛德尔作品中怪诞美学的批判性理解。她驳斥了沃尔夫冈·凯瑟(Wolfgang Kayser) 1957年对怪诞的权威研究,因为它强调永恒的比喻,相反,她认为,一种美学在语境中变得怪诞,与通用形式相关,它与一种疏远的、多声音的叙事并置,可能是滑稽的。这种叙事的对话性质引发了对熟悉的文学类型如何构建感知和思维模式(主体位置)以及类型如何与形成现实概念的社会话语相互作用的反思。Öttl建立在米哈伊尔·巴赫金关于怪诞的讨论之上。虽然巴赫金在对拉伯雷的研究中以嘉年华式的概念化而闻名,但从陀思妥耶夫斯基的研究开始,他对对话艺术的研究对Öttl对怪诞美学的理解更为重要。第三章考察了《Kannibalen》,展示了塔波里对大屠杀幸存者的主观声音和身体感觉的优先排序在当时的新颖性。Öttl在与塔里之前的作品、他后来的一些戏剧、关于作者的学术研究以及其他大屠杀文学联系起来的同时,仔细阅读了这部剧,强调了《坎尼巴伦》在当时的重要性。考虑到这部剧的美学创新,作为大屠杀文学的一部分,以及它对社会话语的引用,她表明,它打破了对大屠杀幸存者的传统哲学表现,同时也采用了古老的反犹主义比喻,比如犹太人是食人族。《Kannibalen》将幸存者介绍为自主说话者,同时使用异化和滑稽元素来破坏话语惯例。最重要的是,它引入了幸存者的身体作为记忆的主要载体。Schindel's Dunkelstein是第四章的重点。剧中虚构的主角是历史人物本杰明·默梅尔斯坦(Benjamin Murmelstein),他是一名拉比,在大屠杀中幸存下来,是特莱西恩施塔特集中营的犹太议会长老。Öttl将辛德尔的戏剧与其他……
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Austrian Studies is an interdisciplinary quarterly that publishes scholarly articles and book reviews on all aspects of the history and culture of Austria, Austro-Hungary, and the Habsburg territory. It is the flagship publication of the Austrian Studies Association and contains contributions in German and English from the world''s premiere scholars in the field of Austrian studies. The journal highlights scholarly work that draws on innovative methodologies and new ways of viewing Austrian history and culture. Although the journal was renamed in 2012 to reflect the increasing scope and diversity of its scholarship, it has a long lineage dating back over a half century as Modern Austrian Literature and, prior to that, The Journal of the International Arthur Schnitzler Research Association.