Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective by Miranda Aldhouse-Green (review)

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 N/A MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/cjm.2023.a912678
Rachael Maxon
{"title":"Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective by Miranda Aldhouse-Green (review)","authors":"Rachael Maxon","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective by Miranda Aldhouse-Green Rachael Maxon Miranda Aldhouse-Green, Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2021), xvii + 188 pp., 55 ills. The Druids have long stood as one of the great mysteries of the distant past. Faced with a lack of written records and scant archaeological remains, scholars have had to contend with the testimonies of late Greek and Roman writers, such as Julius Caesar, Lucan, Tacitus, Diodorus Siculus, and Cassius Dio, in order to understand these perplexing figures. Instead of accepting these foreign writers at face value, Aldhouse-Green critically engages with their testimonies and places them in context with the archaeological record in order to investigate the veracity of the ancient claims against the physical evidence. As a companion to Nora Chadwick’s 1966 monograph The Druids, Ald-house-Green’s Rethinking the Ancient Druids engages with recent archaeological excavations in Britain and Wales that show clear evidence of people with religious knowledge, that are associated with religious objects, or sites that show remains of organized ritual behavior. While Andrew Fitzpatrick also uses this approach of combining the textual and the archaeological record, Aldhouse-Green’s approach to who was considered a Druid is much broader and includes not only “those who called themselves Druids, but also those whose communities recognized them as such, as well as those who simply held religious knowledge and spiritual skills” (2). This broader definition allows her to attribute more archaeological material to the Druids. Rather than reanalyze old evidence with her new methodology, Aldhouse-Green uses the latest evidence from recent [End Page 200] archaeological investigations in Britain, Gaul, and Wales. She includes Wales even though it usually gets left out of traditional discourses, because she believes it has similar archaeological evidence to that of Britain and Gaul, and therefore should be included in discussions about the Druids, as she shows throughout the book. Two major arguments run throughout the book. The first is that the Druids may have left more traces of their existence in the archaeological record than we have come to believe. Aldhouse-Green believes that by shifting our perspectives on the available archaeological remains, we might find more traces of the Druids at sites across Britain and Wales. The second argument is that Wales had a “pivotal rather than peripheral role in a religious leadership usually portrayed as a primarily Gallic phenomenon” (3). This, she argues, can be seen once Welsh mythological texts such as the Mabinogion are combined with the Welsh archaeological record, a claim she supports primarily in chapter 5. By including the finds from Wales alongside those of Britain and Gaul, she argues that new patterns may emerge that shed light on the elusive Druids. The book is divided into nine chapters and arranged thematically. Expertly weaving texts with archaeological finds, Aldhouse-Green discusses some of the main areas of interest in Druidic studies, such as religion, sacrifice, afterlife ideologies, social organization, and art. Despite the ethereality of many of the topics to the archaeological record, she remains undaunted in her pursuit of answers, posing a number of questions and possibilities for future studies to explore when more evidence comes to light. Aldhouse-Green inaugurates her study by reviewing the classical authors who write about the Druids. Using these writers as a textual foundation for analysis, she begins each chapter with a quote illustrating the topic for that chapter. She begins chapter 1 with a discussion of Julius Caesar, who she relies on heavily throughout the book. This is because she believes his account to be one of the most reliable approaches to the Druids, as he spent nearly ten years in Gaul and befriended Diviciacus, a ruler of the Aedui who may have been a Druid. She continues the chapter by introducing other writers, such as Lucan and the famous Scriptores Historiae Augustae and placing them in a historical context so that their contributions on the Druids can be better understood. Chapter 2 interrogates the accuracy of the classical writers concerning the Druids. The chapter investigates not only what these writers say about the religious nature and hierarchy of...","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective by Miranda Aldhouse-Green Rachael Maxon Miranda Aldhouse-Green, Rethinking the Ancient Druids: An Archaeological Perspective (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2021), xvii + 188 pp., 55 ills. The Druids have long stood as one of the great mysteries of the distant past. Faced with a lack of written records and scant archaeological remains, scholars have had to contend with the testimonies of late Greek and Roman writers, such as Julius Caesar, Lucan, Tacitus, Diodorus Siculus, and Cassius Dio, in order to understand these perplexing figures. Instead of accepting these foreign writers at face value, Aldhouse-Green critically engages with their testimonies and places them in context with the archaeological record in order to investigate the veracity of the ancient claims against the physical evidence. As a companion to Nora Chadwick’s 1966 monograph The Druids, Ald-house-Green’s Rethinking the Ancient Druids engages with recent archaeological excavations in Britain and Wales that show clear evidence of people with religious knowledge, that are associated with religious objects, or sites that show remains of organized ritual behavior. While Andrew Fitzpatrick also uses this approach of combining the textual and the archaeological record, Aldhouse-Green’s approach to who was considered a Druid is much broader and includes not only “those who called themselves Druids, but also those whose communities recognized them as such, as well as those who simply held religious knowledge and spiritual skills” (2). This broader definition allows her to attribute more archaeological material to the Druids. Rather than reanalyze old evidence with her new methodology, Aldhouse-Green uses the latest evidence from recent [End Page 200] archaeological investigations in Britain, Gaul, and Wales. She includes Wales even though it usually gets left out of traditional discourses, because she believes it has similar archaeological evidence to that of Britain and Gaul, and therefore should be included in discussions about the Druids, as she shows throughout the book. Two major arguments run throughout the book. The first is that the Druids may have left more traces of their existence in the archaeological record than we have come to believe. Aldhouse-Green believes that by shifting our perspectives on the available archaeological remains, we might find more traces of the Druids at sites across Britain and Wales. The second argument is that Wales had a “pivotal rather than peripheral role in a religious leadership usually portrayed as a primarily Gallic phenomenon” (3). This, she argues, can be seen once Welsh mythological texts such as the Mabinogion are combined with the Welsh archaeological record, a claim she supports primarily in chapter 5. By including the finds from Wales alongside those of Britain and Gaul, she argues that new patterns may emerge that shed light on the elusive Druids. The book is divided into nine chapters and arranged thematically. Expertly weaving texts with archaeological finds, Aldhouse-Green discusses some of the main areas of interest in Druidic studies, such as religion, sacrifice, afterlife ideologies, social organization, and art. Despite the ethereality of many of the topics to the archaeological record, she remains undaunted in her pursuit of answers, posing a number of questions and possibilities for future studies to explore when more evidence comes to light. Aldhouse-Green inaugurates her study by reviewing the classical authors who write about the Druids. Using these writers as a textual foundation for analysis, she begins each chapter with a quote illustrating the topic for that chapter. She begins chapter 1 with a discussion of Julius Caesar, who she relies on heavily throughout the book. This is because she believes his account to be one of the most reliable approaches to the Druids, as he spent nearly ten years in Gaul and befriended Diviciacus, a ruler of the Aedui who may have been a Druid. She continues the chapter by introducing other writers, such as Lucan and the famous Scriptores Historiae Augustae and placing them in a historical context so that their contributions on the Druids can be better understood. Chapter 2 interrogates the accuracy of the classical writers concerning the Druids. The chapter investigates not only what these writers say about the religious nature and hierarchy of...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新思考古代德鲁伊:米兰达·奥尔德豪斯-格林的考古学视角(书评)
回顾:重新思考古代德鲁伊:考古视角由米兰达·奥尔德豪斯格林瑞秋·麦克森米兰达·奥尔德豪斯格林,重新思考古代德鲁伊:考古视角(加的夫:威尔士大学出版社,2021),17 + 188页,55页。德鲁伊教长期以来一直是远古时代的一大谜团。由于缺乏书面记录和考古遗迹,学者们不得不与晚期希腊和罗马作家的证词作斗争,如朱利叶斯·凯撒、卢坎、塔西佗、狄奥多罗斯·西库鲁斯和卡西乌斯·迪奥,以理解这些令人困惑的人物。奥尔德豪斯-格林没有从表面上接受这些外国作家,而是批判性地研究他们的证词,并将它们与考古记录联系起来,以调查古代主张与实物证据的真实性。作为诺拉·查德威克(Nora Chadwick) 1966年的专著《德鲁伊》(The Druids)的同伴,阿尔德豪斯·格林(Ald-house-Green)的《重新思考古代德鲁伊》(Rethinking The Ancient Druids)与最近在英国和威尔士的考古发掘有关,这些考古发掘显示了具有宗教知识的人的明确证据,这些人与宗教物品有关,或者显示有组织的仪式行为遗迹的遗址。安德鲁·菲茨帕特里克(Andrew Fitzpatrick)也使用了这种结合文本和考古记录的方法,而奥尔德豪斯·格林(Aldhouse-Green)的方法要广泛得多,不仅包括“那些自称德鲁伊的人,还包括那些社区承认他们的人,以及那些仅仅拥有宗教知识和精神技能的人”(2)。这种更广泛的定义使她能够将更多的考古材料归因于德鲁伊。奥尔德豪斯-格林没有用她的新方法重新分析旧证据,而是使用了最近在英国、高卢和威尔士进行的考古调查的最新证据。她把威尔士也包括了进来,尽管它通常被排除在传统的论述之外,因为她认为威尔士与不列颠和高卢有着相似的考古证据,因此应该被包括在关于德鲁伊教的讨论中,就像她在书中所展示的那样。两个主要论点贯穿全书。首先,德鲁伊教在考古记录中留下的存在痕迹可能比我们认为的要多。奥尔德豪斯-格林认为,通过改变我们对现有考古遗迹的看法,我们可能会在英国和威尔士各地发现更多德鲁伊教的痕迹。第二个论点是,威尔士“在宗教领导中扮演着关键而非次要的角色,通常被描绘为主要的高卢现象”(3)。她认为,一旦将威尔士神话文本(如《马比诺吉奥翁》)与威尔士考古记录结合起来,就可以看出这一点,她在第5章主要支持了这一观点。她认为,通过将威尔士的发现与英国和高卢的发现结合起来,可能会出现新的模式,从而揭示难以捉摸的德鲁伊。全书分为九章,按主题排列。奥尔德豪斯-格林将文本与考古发现巧妙地编织在一起,讨论了德鲁伊研究的一些主要领域,如宗教、祭祀、来世的意识形态、社会组织和艺术。尽管考古记录中的许多主题都是虚无缥缈的,但她仍然毫不畏惧地追求答案,为未来的研究提出了许多问题和可能性,以便在更多证据浮出水面时进行探索。奥尔德豪斯-格林通过回顾写德鲁伊教的古典作家开始了她的研究。她以这些作家作为分析的文本基础,每章开头都引用一段话来说明该章的主题。她在第一章开始讨论凯撒大帝,她在整本书中都离不开凯撒大帝。这是因为她相信他的描述是了解德鲁伊教的最可靠的方法之一,因为他在高卢待了近十年,并与可能是德鲁伊教的埃杜伊统治者迪维西亚库斯(Diviciacus)成为朋友。她继续介绍了其他作家,如卢坎和著名的奥古斯都历史学家,并将他们置于历史背景中,以便更好地理解他们对德鲁伊教的贡献。第二章质疑古典作家关于德鲁伊教的准确性。这一章不仅调查了这些作者对……的宗教性质和等级制度的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies publishes articles by graduate students and recent PhDs in any field of medieval and Renaissance studies. The journal maintains a tradition of gathering work from across disciplines, with a special interest in articles that have an interdisciplinary or cross-cultural scope.
期刊最新文献
Women’s Lives: Self-Representation, Reception and Appropriation in the Middle Ages ed. by Daniel Armenti and Nahir I. Otaño Gracia (review) The Complete History of the Black Death by Ole J. Benedictow (review) Art and Curiosity Cabinets of the Late Renaissance: A Contribution to the History of Collecting by Julius von Schlosser, and: Kunstkammer: Early Modern Art and Curiosity Cabinets in the Holy Roman Empire by Jeffrey Chipps Smith (review) Bishop Æthelwold, His Followers, and Saints’ Cults in Early Medieval England: Power, Belief, and Religious Reform by Alison Hudson (review) Writing Old Age and Impairment in Late Medieval England by Will Rogers (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1