Effectiveness of Addiction Treatment Programs in Iran in Terms of Social, Psychological, Economic, and Therapeutic Outcomes: An Appraisal

Ebrahim Masoudnia
{"title":"Effectiveness of Addiction Treatment Programs in Iran in Terms of Social, Psychological, Economic, and Therapeutic Outcomes: An Appraisal","authors":"Ebrahim Masoudnia","doi":"10.32598/irj.21.3.1625.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In recent years, various treatment programs have been implemented in Iran aimed at rehabilitation and improvement of drug-dependent patients but so far, few studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of different treatment programs in terms of different outcomes. This study was conducted to determine the differences among patients participating in three therapeutic programs, outpatient, mid-term residential program, and therapeutic community (TC) in terms of social, psychological, economic, and therapeutic outcomes. Methods: The present study was conducted using a descriptive design and ex post facto method. Data were collected from patients participating in three treatment plans (outpatient treatment=49; mid-term residential treatment=49; and TC plan=49). Patients participating in the TC program were all enumerated and patients participating in the outpatient and mid-term residency treatment plan were selected by random sampling. Data collection tools were a socio-demographic characteristics checklist, researcher-made questionnaire for relapse, a general health questionnaire (GHQ), a world health organization quality of life (WHOQOL) questionnaire, and a family relationship index (FRI). The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-square, and Scheffe’s post hoc test. Results: Significant differences were observed between the three treatments in terms of the rate of relapse (P<0.01), participation in criminal activities (P<0.01), changes in drug use in the treatment process or after treatment (P<0.01), employment status (P<0.01), mental health (P<0.01), quality of life (P<0.01), and family relationships index (FRI) (P<0.01). Discussion: The TC program showed more positive outcomes in terms of the rate of relapse and quality of life compared to the other two therapeutic programs. The outpatient treatment program was more effective in terms of participation in criminal activities, changes in drug use, employment, and quality of family relationships. The mid-term residency program showed a low or negative impact on all studied outcomes. Therefore, it is necessary to reevaluate the programs presented in the mid-term residential program.","PeriodicalId":37644,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Rehabilitation Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/irj.21.3.1625.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In recent years, various treatment programs have been implemented in Iran aimed at rehabilitation and improvement of drug-dependent patients but so far, few studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of different treatment programs in terms of different outcomes. This study was conducted to determine the differences among patients participating in three therapeutic programs, outpatient, mid-term residential program, and therapeutic community (TC) in terms of social, psychological, economic, and therapeutic outcomes. Methods: The present study was conducted using a descriptive design and ex post facto method. Data were collected from patients participating in three treatment plans (outpatient treatment=49; mid-term residential treatment=49; and TC plan=49). Patients participating in the TC program were all enumerated and patients participating in the outpatient and mid-term residency treatment plan were selected by random sampling. Data collection tools were a socio-demographic characteristics checklist, researcher-made questionnaire for relapse, a general health questionnaire (GHQ), a world health organization quality of life (WHOQOL) questionnaire, and a family relationship index (FRI). The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-square, and Scheffe’s post hoc test. Results: Significant differences were observed between the three treatments in terms of the rate of relapse (P<0.01), participation in criminal activities (P<0.01), changes in drug use in the treatment process or after treatment (P<0.01), employment status (P<0.01), mental health (P<0.01), quality of life (P<0.01), and family relationships index (FRI) (P<0.01). Discussion: The TC program showed more positive outcomes in terms of the rate of relapse and quality of life compared to the other two therapeutic programs. The outpatient treatment program was more effective in terms of participation in criminal activities, changes in drug use, employment, and quality of family relationships. The mid-term residency program showed a low or negative impact on all studied outcomes. Therefore, it is necessary to reevaluate the programs presented in the mid-term residential program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从社会、心理、经济和治疗结果来看,伊朗成瘾治疗项目的有效性:一项评估
目的:近年来,伊朗实施了各种旨在药物依赖患者康复和改善的治疗方案,但迄今为止,关于不同治疗方案在不同结果方面的有效性的研究很少。本研究旨在探讨参与三种治疗方案(门诊、中期住院和治疗社区)的患者在社会、心理、经济和治疗结果方面的差异。方法:本研究采用描述性设计和事后分析方法。数据来自参加三种治疗方案的患者(门诊治疗=49;中期住院治疗=49;TC计划=49)。对参与TC项目的患者全部进行枚举,随机抽样选取参与门诊和中期住院治疗计划的患者。数据收集工具为社会人口学特征检查表、研究者自制的复发问卷、一般健康问卷(GHQ)、世界卫生组织生活质量问卷(WHOQOL)和家庭关系指数(FRI)。数据分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、卡方分析和Scheffe事后检验。结果:三种治疗在复发率(P<0.01)、参与犯罪活动(P<0.01)、治疗过程中或治疗后药物使用变化(P<0.01)、就业状况(P<0.01)、心理健康(P<0.01)、生活质量(P<0.01)、家庭关系指数(FRI) (P<0.01)等方面差异均有统计学意义。讨论:与其他两种治疗方案相比,TC方案在复发率和生活质量方面显示出更积极的结果。门诊治疗方案在参与犯罪活动、药物使用变化、就业和家庭关系质量方面更为有效。中期住院医师计划对所有研究结果的影响都很低,甚至是负面的。因此,有必要重新评估中期住宿计划中提出的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Rehabilitation Journal
Iranian Rehabilitation Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Rehabilitation Journal aims to provide the readers with a variety of topics, including: original articles, hypothesis formation, editorials, literature reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports, letters to the editor, discussions of public policy issues and book reviews, and methodology articles in the fields of rehabilitation and social welfare, including (but not limited to): -Clinical and basic research in various special needs groups -Physical and mental rehabilitation -Epidemiological studies on disabling conditions -Biostatistics -Vocational and socio-medical aspects of rehabilitation IRJ also welcomes papers focusing on the genetic basis of common disabling disorders across human populations. Those studies may include (but not limited to): -The genetic basis of common single gene and complex disorders. -Bioinformatics tools to investigate and to model biological phenomena -Novel computational tools and databases -Sequence analysis -Population analysis -Databases and text mining
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Chest Wall Motions by Optoelectronic Plethysmography in Scoliosis Patient: A Case Study Incidence and Related Factors to Developing Dysphagia in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Neck Pain Severity and Work Ability Index: A Study of Tehran Dental Students Influence of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Altered Plantar Pressure Distribution and Ankle Biomechanics in Individuals With Diabetic Foot Syndrome Effects of Children’s Communication Disorders on the Quality of Life of Their Parents in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1