Skill demand and labour market concentration: evidence from Italian vacancies

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR International Journal of Manpower Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1108/ijm-04-2023-0181
Emilio Colombo, Alberto Marcato
{"title":"Skill demand and labour market concentration: evidence from Italian vacancies","authors":"Emilio Colombo, Alberto Marcato","doi":"10.1108/ijm-04-2023-0181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The authors provide a novel interpretation of the relationship between skill demand and labour market concentration based on the training rationale. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a novel data set on Italian online job vacancies during 2013–2018 to analyse the relationship between labour market concentration and employers' skill demand. The authors construct measures of market concentration and skill intensity in the local labour market. The authors regress the measures of skill demand on market concentration, controlling for sector, occupations and other features of the labour market. The authors also use the Hausman–Nevo instrument for market concentration. Findings The authors show that employers in a highly concentrated labour market demand competencies associated with the ability of workers to learn faster (e.g. social skills) rather than actual knowledge. They also require less experience but higher education. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that employers in more concentrated labour markets are more prone to train their employees. Instead of looking for workers who already have job-specific skills, they look for workers who can acquire them faster and efficiently. The authors provide a theoretical framework within which to analyse these aspects as well as providing a test for the relevant hypotheses. Practical implications In addition to cross-countries differences in labour market regulations, the authors' findings suggest that policy authorities should consider the local labour market structure when studying workforce development programmes aimed at bridging the skill gap of displaced workers. Moreover, the authors show that market concentration can have relevant implications for human resource (HR) managers by affecting their recruitment behaviour through the demand for skills. In fact, concentrated markets tend to favour firms' collusion and anti-competitive behaviour that could strongly affect HR management practices. Originality/value The authors' paper innovates on the literature in a number of ways. First, the authors provide evidence of local labour market concentration in Italy. Second, the authors provide evidence of skill demand at the local level using a detailed skill taxonomy that goes beyond the classical distinction between high and low skills. Third, and most importantly, the authors provide evidence of the relationship between skill demand and labour market concentration. By analysing detailed skills and competencies, the authors take one step beyond understanding the features of labour demand in monopsonistic markets.","PeriodicalId":47915,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Manpower","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Manpower","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-04-2023-0181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The authors provide a novel interpretation of the relationship between skill demand and labour market concentration based on the training rationale. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a novel data set on Italian online job vacancies during 2013–2018 to analyse the relationship between labour market concentration and employers' skill demand. The authors construct measures of market concentration and skill intensity in the local labour market. The authors regress the measures of skill demand on market concentration, controlling for sector, occupations and other features of the labour market. The authors also use the Hausman–Nevo instrument for market concentration. Findings The authors show that employers in a highly concentrated labour market demand competencies associated with the ability of workers to learn faster (e.g. social skills) rather than actual knowledge. They also require less experience but higher education. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that employers in more concentrated labour markets are more prone to train their employees. Instead of looking for workers who already have job-specific skills, they look for workers who can acquire them faster and efficiently. The authors provide a theoretical framework within which to analyse these aspects as well as providing a test for the relevant hypotheses. Practical implications In addition to cross-countries differences in labour market regulations, the authors' findings suggest that policy authorities should consider the local labour market structure when studying workforce development programmes aimed at bridging the skill gap of displaced workers. Moreover, the authors show that market concentration can have relevant implications for human resource (HR) managers by affecting their recruitment behaviour through the demand for skills. In fact, concentrated markets tend to favour firms' collusion and anti-competitive behaviour that could strongly affect HR management practices. Originality/value The authors' paper innovates on the literature in a number of ways. First, the authors provide evidence of local labour market concentration in Italy. Second, the authors provide evidence of skill demand at the local level using a detailed skill taxonomy that goes beyond the classical distinction between high and low skills. Third, and most importantly, the authors provide evidence of the relationship between skill demand and labour market concentration. By analysing detailed skills and competencies, the authors take one step beyond understanding the features of labour demand in monopsonistic markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技能需求和劳动力市场集中度:来自意大利职位空缺的证据
作者基于培训理论,对技能需求和劳动力市场集中度之间的关系提供了一种新的解释。设计/方法/方法作者使用2013-2018年意大利在线职位空缺的新数据集来分析劳动力市场集中度与雇主技能需求之间的关系。作者构建了当地劳动力市场的市场集中度和技能强度的度量。作者在控制部门、职业和劳动力市场的其他特征的情况下,对市场集中度的技能需求指标进行了回归。作者还使用了Hausman-Nevo工具来分析市场集中度。研究结果表明,在高度集中的劳动力市场中,雇主需要的是与工人快速学习能力相关的能力(如社交技能),而不是实际知识。他们对工作经验的要求也不高,但需要更高的学历。这些结果与假设相一致,即在更集中的劳动力市场中,雇主更倾向于培训员工。他们寻找的不是已经具备特定工作技能的工人,而是能够更快、更有效地掌握这些技能的工人。作者提供了一个理论框架来分析这些方面,并为相关假设提供了一个检验。除了劳动力市场法规的跨国差异之外,作者的研究结果表明,政策当局在研究旨在弥补失业工人技能差距的劳动力发展方案时,应考虑当地的劳动力市场结构。此外,作者还表明,市场集中度可以通过对技能的需求影响人力资源经理的招聘行为,从而对人力资源经理产生相关影响。事实上,集中的市场倾向于支持公司的勾结和反竞争行为,这可能会严重影响人力资源管理实践。作者的论文在许多方面对文献进行了创新。首先,作者提供了意大利本地劳动力市场集中的证据。其次,作者通过详细的技能分类提供了当地技能需求的证据,这种分类超越了传统的高技能和低技能的区分。第三,也是最重要的一点,作者提供了技能需求与劳动力市场集中度之间关系的证据。通过分析详细的技能和能力,作者在理解垄断市场中劳动力需求特征的基础上又迈出了一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
11.40%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ■Employee welfare ■Human aspects during the introduction of technology ■Human resource recruitment, retention and development ■National and international aspects of HR planning ■Objectives of human resource planning and forecasting requirements ■The working environment
期刊最新文献
Intersectional analysis of the labour market impacts of COVID on women with young children and in low-skilled jobs Intellectual capital as a driver of value creation in Serbian entrepreneurial firms Tax incentives for jobs: bang for the buck or wasted resources? Employment discrimination against transgender women in England Impact of green self-managed teams on firm’s performance: a moderating serial mediation model from an emerging market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1