Immunisation of chickens with commercial anticoccidial vaccines Immucox® and Livacox® showed varied protection against a virulent Eimeria tenella local isolate and Houghton strain

O. B. Akanbi, V. O. Taiwo, S. D. Ola-Fadunsin
{"title":"Immunisation of chickens with commercial anticoccidial vaccines Immucox® and Livacox® showed varied protection against a virulent Eimeria tenella local isolate and Houghton strain","authors":"O. B. Akanbi, V. O. Taiwo, S. D. Ola-Fadunsin","doi":"10.15547/bjvm.2021-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coccidia is an ubiquitous intestinal protozoan of poultry that invade the mucosa and induce epithelial cell necrosis and inflammation. To assess the pathogenicity of two commercial anticoccidial vaccines against a local isolate of Eimeria tenella, ninety (90) day-old dominant black chicks were assigned to 9 groups of 10 birds each. Immunisation was done at 5 days of age by oral gavage. Infection was done with 1.7×104 E. tenella of either Houghton strain (H-strain) or local isolate (L-isolate) at 4 weeks of age. Increased pathogenicity of the local isolate was observed, as it produced a more severe gross pathologic lesion score than the Houghton strain in unvaccinated but infected groups of chickens 6 days post-infection (dpi). The high virulence and pathogenicity of the local E. tenella was responsible for the differences in the severity of clinical signs, gross and microscopic lesions observed between the H-strain and L-isolate infected groups. The histopathology showed that the vaccinated groups, infected with the H-strain of E. tenella, did not show presence of oocysts or schizonts by 6 dpi. The successful immunogenicity and effectiveness of these two vaccines as measured by the histopathologic lesions and the presence of oocysts in the enterocytes of the caecal crypts of these chickens were reduced in vaccinated and L-isolate infected groups. The findings in the L-isolate groups were setbacks to the use of live attenuated and non-attenuated anticoccidial vaccines for control of coccidiosis and in particular, caecal coccidiosis in chickens reared in environments dominated by virulent E. tenella.","PeriodicalId":9279,"journal":{"name":"BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15547/bjvm.2021-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Coccidia is an ubiquitous intestinal protozoan of poultry that invade the mucosa and induce epithelial cell necrosis and inflammation. To assess the pathogenicity of two commercial anticoccidial vaccines against a local isolate of Eimeria tenella, ninety (90) day-old dominant black chicks were assigned to 9 groups of 10 birds each. Immunisation was done at 5 days of age by oral gavage. Infection was done with 1.7×104 E. tenella of either Houghton strain (H-strain) or local isolate (L-isolate) at 4 weeks of age. Increased pathogenicity of the local isolate was observed, as it produced a more severe gross pathologic lesion score than the Houghton strain in unvaccinated but infected groups of chickens 6 days post-infection (dpi). The high virulence and pathogenicity of the local E. tenella was responsible for the differences in the severity of clinical signs, gross and microscopic lesions observed between the H-strain and L-isolate infected groups. The histopathology showed that the vaccinated groups, infected with the H-strain of E. tenella, did not show presence of oocysts or schizonts by 6 dpi. The successful immunogenicity and effectiveness of these two vaccines as measured by the histopathologic lesions and the presence of oocysts in the enterocytes of the caecal crypts of these chickens were reduced in vaccinated and L-isolate infected groups. The findings in the L-isolate groups were setbacks to the use of live attenuated and non-attenuated anticoccidial vaccines for control of coccidiosis and in particular, caecal coccidiosis in chickens reared in environments dominated by virulent E. tenella.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用商业抗球虫疫苗Immucox®和Livacox®对鸡进行免疫,对毒力强的柔弱艾美耳虫本地分离株和霍顿菌株表现出不同的保护作用
球虫是一种普遍存在于家禽肠道的原生动物,可侵入粘膜,引起上皮细胞坏死和炎症。为了评估两种市售抗球虫疫苗对当地一株柔嫩艾美耳球虫的致病性,将90只90日龄优势黑雏鸡分为9组,每组10只。5日龄通过灌胃进行免疫接种。在4周龄时用霍顿菌株(h株)或当地分离株(l -分离株)1.7×104 tenella进行感染。在感染后6天(dpi)未接种疫苗但感染的鸡群中,观察到当地分离株的致病性增加,因为它比霍顿菌株产生更严重的大体病理损伤评分。h株和l分离株感染组在临床症状、肉眼和显微镜下观察到的病变的严重程度上存在差异,这是当地tenella的高毒力和致病性的原因。组织病理学结果显示,接种组感染了h型软毛杆菌,6 dpi后未出现卵囊或分裂。这两种疫苗的成功免疫原性和有效性(通过组织病理学病变和这些鸡盲肠隐窝肠细胞中卵囊的存在来衡量)在接种和l -分离感染组中有所降低。l -分离组的发现是使用减毒和非减毒抗球虫活疫苗控制球虫病,特别是在毒力强的tenella E.占主导地位的环境中饲养的鸡的盲肠球虫病的挫折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJVM is a no-fee open-access scientific quarterly journal which covers topics related to both fundamental and applied aspects of veterinary medicine and to closely connected subjects with it. The journal publishes original papers, short communications and reviews.
期刊最新文献
Resistin gene expression: Novel study in dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) Feral pigeons as reservoirs for hazardous Chlamydophila psittaci strains with zoonotic potential Prevalence, haematological, biochemical abnormalities and clinical syndromes of FeLV and FeLV/FIV co-infection among cat population in Moscow and the Moscow region, Russia A case report of acute bilateral bullous keratopathy in a septic calf Canine ophthalmic patients with endocrine and metabolic disorders - a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1