Optimizing the Organization of Statistical Activities through the Revision of Law No. 16 of 1997 Concerning Statistics

Ramdhanul Yuliarto, Moh. Zeinudin, Made Warka
{"title":"Optimizing the Organization of Statistical Activities through the Revision of Law No. 16 of 1997 Concerning Statistics","authors":"Ramdhanul Yuliarto, Moh. Zeinudin, Made Warka","doi":"10.59653/jplls.v1i03.333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research to find out and study how implementation of basic statistics carried out by the Central Statistics Agency based on Law Number 16 of 1997 concerning Statistics (Statistics Law); what are the obstacles in optimizing the implementation of basic statistics and how to overcome the obstacles in implementing basic statistics optimally through reform of the Statistics Law. This research is normative legal research with a legal political and legal sociology approach, which examines the Statistics Law as positive law in the administration of basic statistics and formulates legal substance that should be implemented in the future. The data source is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Data collection methods use library studies and interviews. Primary legal materials and secondary legal materials are analyzed using legal analysis methods. The deductive thinking process is used to draw conclusions. The theoretical basis used as an analytical tool in reviewing research results and discussions is the theory of legal effectiveness and public policy theory. The results of this research indicate that the implementation of basic statistical activities by BPS based on the Statistics Law is not running optimally because there are obstacles, such as: low public awareness of the importance and usefulness of statistics, the application of criminal sanctions for respondents that are not effective and statistical data in ministries/ Partial government institutions. These obstacles are fundamental and cannot be overcome casuistically but must be done with comprehensive and revolutionary efforts, so efforts to overcome them are by reforming the Statistics Law so that the implementation of basic statistical activities by BPS can run optimally. From this explanation it can be concluded that in order to obtain legal certainty for both BPS officers and respondents, an article is needed that guarantees legal certainty so that if respondents refuse, they can be given sanctions which of course must be regulated in the Law on Statistics. We as authors propose and suggest that the Government can immediately update the Statistics Law and correct the weaknesses we have mentioned above.","PeriodicalId":431410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies","volume":"150 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i03.333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research to find out and study how implementation of basic statistics carried out by the Central Statistics Agency based on Law Number 16 of 1997 concerning Statistics (Statistics Law); what are the obstacles in optimizing the implementation of basic statistics and how to overcome the obstacles in implementing basic statistics optimally through reform of the Statistics Law. This research is normative legal research with a legal political and legal sociology approach, which examines the Statistics Law as positive law in the administration of basic statistics and formulates legal substance that should be implemented in the future. The data source is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Data collection methods use library studies and interviews. Primary legal materials and secondary legal materials are analyzed using legal analysis methods. The deductive thinking process is used to draw conclusions. The theoretical basis used as an analytical tool in reviewing research results and discussions is the theory of legal effectiveness and public policy theory. The results of this research indicate that the implementation of basic statistical activities by BPS based on the Statistics Law is not running optimally because there are obstacles, such as: low public awareness of the importance and usefulness of statistics, the application of criminal sanctions for respondents that are not effective and statistical data in ministries/ Partial government institutions. These obstacles are fundamental and cannot be overcome casuistically but must be done with comprehensive and revolutionary efforts, so efforts to overcome them are by reforming the Statistics Law so that the implementation of basic statistical activities by BPS can run optimally. From this explanation it can be concluded that in order to obtain legal certainty for both BPS officers and respondents, an article is needed that guarantees legal certainty so that if respondents refuse, they can be given sanctions which of course must be regulated in the Law on Statistics. We as authors propose and suggest that the Government can immediately update the Statistics Law and correct the weaknesses we have mentioned above.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过修订1997年第16号统计法优化统计活动的组织
这项研究是为了找出和研究中央统计局如何根据1997年关于统计的第16号法(统计法)实施基本统计;优化基础统计实施的障碍是什么,如何通过统计法改革来克服优化基础统计实施的障碍。本研究是运用法律政治学和法律社会学方法的规范性法律研究,将《统计法》作为基础统计管理中的实证法进行考察,并制定未来应实施的法律实质。数据来源为二级数据,由一级法律资料和二级法律资料组成。数据收集方法使用图书馆研究和访谈。运用法律分析方法对一手法律资料和第二手法律资料进行分析。演绎思维过程是用来得出结论的。法律效力理论和公共政策理论是回顾研究成果和讨论的分析工具。本研究结果表明,由于存在诸如公众对统计重要性和有用性认识不高、对调查对象实施刑事制裁不有效以及各部委/部分政府机构统计数据不足等障碍,英国统计局基于《统计法》开展的基本统计活动并未达到最佳运行状态。这些都是根本性的障碍,不能一蹴而就,必须通过全面的、革命性的努力来克服。因此,为了使BPS的基本统计活动能够最优地开展,必须通过修改《统计法》来克服这些障碍。从这个解释可以得出结论,为了获得法律确定性的BPS官员和受访者,一篇文章是需要保证法律确定性,这样,如果受访者拒绝,他们可以给予制裁,当然必须在统计法律规定。作为作者,我们提议并建议政府可以立即更新《统计法》,纠正我们上面提到的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Transformation and Business Competition Challenges Comparative Analysis of Antitrust Law A New Mode of MSME Empowerment Creating a Strong Indonesian Economy (Perspective on Business Competition Law) Implementation of the Small Fishers Empowerment Policy in Tikke Village, Tikke Raya District, Pasangkayu Regency Implementation of Regional Asset Management Policies at Office of Theduripoku District in Pasangkayu Regency Urgency of Legal Protection for Religious Scholars in Articles on Blasphemy from the Perspectives of Criminology and Victimology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1