Impact of using standard and high-resolution exposure modalities of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system for dental implants dimension measurements

Hossein Taheri, Mojdeh Mehdizadeh, Parvaneh Rostamzadeh
{"title":"Impact of using standard and high-resolution exposure modalities of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system for dental implants dimension measurements","authors":"Hossein Taheri, Mojdeh Mehdizadeh, Parvaneh Rostamzadeh","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_386_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to analyze the effects of standard and high-resolution exposures on the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT in the evaluation of dental implant dimensions.Materials and Methods: A descriptive–analytical study was carried out on 40 dry human mandibles with appropriate ridge quality based on panoramic radiography. CBCT (Soredex, Cranex 3D, Finland) with a large field of view (FOV) and CMOS flat panel detector were used. CBCT with standard and a high resolution was performed in each mandible. Axial images, reconstructed by OnDemand 3D software, were processed to prepare cross-sectional images from the areas marked by gutta-percha, and then measured by a ruler with an accuracy of 0.01 millimeter in the computer. Measurements were recorded by two observers and the obtained data were compared with the real ones.Results: The results showed suitable repeatability in radiologic measurements (r = 0.971), which is indicative of the high reliability of intraobserver measurement. The measurement of width with high-resolution exposure indicated a significant difference with the real condition (P < 0.001); however, this difference was not significant in the case of standard resolution (P > 0.05). Measurement of height with high resolution showed a significant difference with the real condition in the right mandible (P = 0.04) and left mandible (P = 0.05); however, this difference was not significant in standard resolution (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Based on our findings, the standard CBCT resolution modality is suggested for dental implant images due to its higher accuracy than high-resolution methods for diagnosing the implant dimensions.","PeriodicalId":7225,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Research","volume":"282 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_386_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to analyze the effects of standard and high-resolution exposures on the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT in the evaluation of dental implant dimensions.Materials and Methods: A descriptive–analytical study was carried out on 40 dry human mandibles with appropriate ridge quality based on panoramic radiography. CBCT (Soredex, Cranex 3D, Finland) with a large field of view (FOV) and CMOS flat panel detector were used. CBCT with standard and a high resolution was performed in each mandible. Axial images, reconstructed by OnDemand 3D software, were processed to prepare cross-sectional images from the areas marked by gutta-percha, and then measured by a ruler with an accuracy of 0.01 millimeter in the computer. Measurements were recorded by two observers and the obtained data were compared with the real ones.Results: The results showed suitable repeatability in radiologic measurements (r = 0.971), which is indicative of the high reliability of intraobserver measurement. The measurement of width with high-resolution exposure indicated a significant difference with the real condition (P < 0.001); however, this difference was not significant in the case of standard resolution (P > 0.05). Measurement of height with high resolution showed a significant difference with the real condition in the right mandible (P = 0.04) and left mandible (P = 0.05); however, this difference was not significant in standard resolution (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Based on our findings, the standard CBCT resolution modality is suggested for dental implant images due to its higher accuracy than high-resolution methods for diagnosing the implant dimensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)系统的标准和高分辨率暴露模式对种植体尺寸测量的影响
背景:本研究旨在分析标准曝光和高分辨率曝光对CBCT评估种植体尺寸诊断准确性的影响。材料与方法:对40例具有适当脊型质量的干性下颌骨进行全景x线摄影的描述性分析研究。采用CBCT (Soredex, Cranex 3D, Finland)大视场(FOV)和CMOS平板探测器。在每个下颌骨进行标准和高分辨率的CBCT。轴向图像由OnDemand 3D软件重建,由杜仲胶标记的区域处理成截面图像,然后在计算机中用精度为0.01毫米的直尺测量。测量结果由两名观测者记录,并与实际数据进行比较。结果:放射学测量结果重复性良好(r = 0.971),显示了观察者内测量的高可靠性。高分辨率曝光测量的宽度与真实情况有显著差异(P < 0.001);但在标准分辨率下,差异不显著(P > 0.05)。高分辨率测量的右下颌骨高度与真实情况差异有统计学意义(P = 0.04),左下颌骨高度与真实情况差异有统计学意义(P = 0.05);但在标准分辨率上差异不显著(P > 0.05)。结论:基于我们的研究结果,推荐使用标准CBCT分辨率模式诊断种植体尺寸,因为它比高分辨率方法诊断种植体尺寸的准确性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic Sulfoquinovosyl Glycerols from the Seaweed Sargassum Angustifolium from Persian Gulf Effect of Silybum Marianum on Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity with Cisplatin Evaluation of IP3R3 Gene Silencing Effect on Pyruvate Dehydrogenase (PDH) Enzyme Activity in Breast Cancer Cells with and Without Estrogen Receptor Diagnostic Value of Dermoscopic Structures in Predicting Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Skin of Color The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1