The Company She Seeks: How the Prismatic Effects of Ties to High-Status Network Contacts Can Reduce Status for Women in Groups

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Organization Science Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1287/orsc.2020.14640
Siyu Yu, Catherine Shea
{"title":"The Company She Seeks: How the Prismatic Effects of Ties to High-Status Network Contacts Can Reduce Status for Women in Groups","authors":"Siyu Yu, Catherine Shea","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2020.14640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women experience chronically inferior returns in organizations. One common recommendation is to form instrumental network ties with high-status others in groups. We integrate research on social status, social perceptions, and gender issues in social networks to suggest that, despite the theoretical and empirical appeal of this approach, instrumental ties to high-status network contacts (versus ties to lower-status network contacts) in groups may incur hidden social status costs for women in intragroup status-conferral processes. Instrumental ties to high-status network contacts may be perceived as a sign of agency of the focal person, which violates feminine gender norms. Women with these high-status network contacts in groups may therefore be perceived as less communal, thus subsequently lowering their status in the eyes of other group members compared with women with lower-status network contacts. Studies 1–4, across cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental designs, support our model. Study 5 suggests that signaling a group-oriented goal may mitigate the interpersonal, social perceptual costs of instrumental ties to high-status network contacts for women. The effect of ties with high-status network contacts for men is relatively inconsistent. This research reveals a potential social-network dilemma for women: Instrumental ties to high-status network contacts in groups and organizations are necessary for success and should be encouraged, yet they may also create an extra social perceptual hurdle for women. Organizations need to investigate social and structural solutions that harness the benefits of high-status network contacts for women, while minimizing any potential social perceptual costs. Funding: Financial support from the Jones Graduate School of Business, Rice University, is gratefully acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.14640 .","PeriodicalId":48462,"journal":{"name":"Organization Science","volume":"37 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.14640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women experience chronically inferior returns in organizations. One common recommendation is to form instrumental network ties with high-status others in groups. We integrate research on social status, social perceptions, and gender issues in social networks to suggest that, despite the theoretical and empirical appeal of this approach, instrumental ties to high-status network contacts (versus ties to lower-status network contacts) in groups may incur hidden social status costs for women in intragroup status-conferral processes. Instrumental ties to high-status network contacts may be perceived as a sign of agency of the focal person, which violates feminine gender norms. Women with these high-status network contacts in groups may therefore be perceived as less communal, thus subsequently lowering their status in the eyes of other group members compared with women with lower-status network contacts. Studies 1–4, across cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental designs, support our model. Study 5 suggests that signaling a group-oriented goal may mitigate the interpersonal, social perceptual costs of instrumental ties to high-status network contacts for women. The effect of ties with high-status network contacts for men is relatively inconsistent. This research reveals a potential social-network dilemma for women: Instrumental ties to high-status network contacts in groups and organizations are necessary for success and should be encouraged, yet they may also create an extra social perceptual hurdle for women. Organizations need to investigate social and structural solutions that harness the benefits of high-status network contacts for women, while minimizing any potential social perceptual costs. Funding: Financial support from the Jones Graduate School of Business, Rice University, is gratefully acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.14640 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
她寻找的公司:与高地位网络联系人的关系如何产生棱镜效应,从而降低女性在群体中的地位
女性在组织中经历了长期的低回报。一个常见的建议是与群体中地位高的人建立工具性的网络联系。我们整合了社会地位、社会观念和社会网络中的性别问题的研究,表明尽管这种方法具有理论和实证的吸引力,但群体中与高地位网络联系人的工具联系(相对于与低地位网络联系人的联系)可能会在群体内部地位授予过程中为女性带来隐藏的社会地位成本。与高地位网络接触的工具性联系可能被视为焦点人的代理的标志,这违反了女性的性别规范。因此,在群体中拥有这些高地位网络联系人的女性可能会被认为不那么合群,因此,与地位较低的网络联系人的女性相比,她们在其他群体成员眼中的地位会降低。研究1-4,横断面,纵向和实验设计,支持我们的模型。研究5表明,表明群体导向的目标可能会减轻女性与高地位网络联系的工具关系的人际关系和社会感知成本。对于男性来说,拥有高地位网络联系人的关系的影响相对不一致。这项研究揭示了女性潜在的社会网络困境:与团体和组织中地位较高的网络联系人的工具性联系是成功的必要条件,应该得到鼓励,但它们也可能给女性带来额外的社会感知障碍。组织需要研究社会和结构上的解决方案,利用女性的高地位网络联系带来的好处,同时最大限度地减少任何潜在的社会感知成本。资金:感谢莱斯大学琼斯商学院提供的资金支持。补充材料:在线附录和数据文件可在https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.14640上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organization Science
Organization Science MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
166
期刊介绍: Organization Science is ranked among the top journals in management by the Social Science Citation Index in terms of impact and is widely recognized in the fields of strategy, management, and organization theory. Organization Science provides one umbrella for the publication of research from all over the world in fields such as organization theory, strategic management, sociology, economics, political science, history, information science, communication theory, and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Can You Go Home Again? Performance Assistance Between Boomerangs and Incumbent Employees Cautious Exploitation: Learning and Search in Problems of Evaluation and Discovery Embrace the Unexpected: How Organizations Foster Participatory Improvisation with Customers Temporal Miscoupling: The Challenges and Consequences of Enacting a Practice in Decline Mavericks and Diplomats: Bridging Commercial and Institutional Entrepreneurship for Society’s Grand Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1