Obstetric Outcomes of Singleton Birth After Hysteroscopic Septoplasty of Complete Uterine Septum

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1089/gyn.2023.0031
Omar Abuzeid, Cassandra Heiselman, Anna Fuchs, Jenny LaChance, Kimberly Herrera, David Garry, Mostafa Abuzeid
{"title":"Obstetric Outcomes of Singleton Birth After Hysteroscopic Septoplasty of Complete Uterine Septum","authors":"Omar Abuzeid, Cassandra Heiselman, Anna Fuchs, Jenny LaChance, Kimberly Herrera, David Garry, Mostafa Abuzeid","doi":"10.1089/gyn.2023.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this research was to determine the obstetric outcomes in patients who had singleton live birth after hysteroscopic septoplasty of complete uterine septum (CUS) that reached the internal or the external cervical os. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 112 patients, each with a history of reproductive failure between 2002 and 2019. Of these patients, 29 each had a singleton live birth after hysteroscopic septoplasty for CUS (group 1) and 83 each had a singleton live birth after hysteroscopy revealed a normal uterine cavity (group 2). In group 1 the septum reached the internal or the external cervical os in 16 and 13 patients, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed of 24 patients: 8, in whom the septum reached the external cervical os (group 1a); and 16, in whom the septum reached the internal cervical os (group 1b). Results: There was no significant difference in incidence of premature birth (12.5% versus 12.2%) or other pregnancy complications, gestational age, or newborn birth weight between group 1 and group 2, respectively. Obstetric outcomes between the 2 subgroups were also similar. Conclusions: The study data suggest favorable obstetric outcomes for singleton gestation after hysteroscopic septoplasty of CUS reaching the internal or external cervical os. Division of cervical septum was not associated with cervical insufficiency. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)","PeriodicalId":44791,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2023.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this research was to determine the obstetric outcomes in patients who had singleton live birth after hysteroscopic septoplasty of complete uterine septum (CUS) that reached the internal or the external cervical os. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 112 patients, each with a history of reproductive failure between 2002 and 2019. Of these patients, 29 each had a singleton live birth after hysteroscopic septoplasty for CUS (group 1) and 83 each had a singleton live birth after hysteroscopy revealed a normal uterine cavity (group 2). In group 1 the septum reached the internal or the external cervical os in 16 and 13 patients, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed of 24 patients: 8, in whom the septum reached the external cervical os (group 1a); and 16, in whom the septum reached the internal cervical os (group 1b). Results: There was no significant difference in incidence of premature birth (12.5% versus 12.2%) or other pregnancy complications, gestational age, or newborn birth weight between group 1 and group 2, respectively. Obstetric outcomes between the 2 subgroups were also similar. Conclusions: The study data suggest favorable obstetric outcomes for singleton gestation after hysteroscopic septoplasty of CUS reaching the internal or external cervical os. Division of cervical septum was not associated with cervical insufficiency. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫腔镜下完全性子宫隔成形术后单胎分娩的产科结局
目的:本研究的目的是确定宫腔镜下完全性子宫间隔成形术(CUS)到达宫颈内腔或宫颈外腔后单胎活产的产科结局。材料与方法:本回顾性研究包括112例患者,均有2002年至2019年期间的生殖失败史。其中宫腔镜下室间隔成形术治疗CUS后各有29例单胎活产(1组),宫腔镜检查显示子宫腔正常后各有83例单胎活产(2组)。1组中室间隔到达宫颈内腔或宫颈外腔分别有16例和13例。对24例患者进行亚组分析:8例中隔到达颈外骨(1a组);16例中隔到达颈内OS (1b组)。结果:1组与2组在早产发生率(12.5% vs 12.2%)、其他妊娠并发症、胎龄、新生儿体重方面均无显著差异。两个亚组的产科结局也相似。结论:本研究数据提示宫腔镜下输卵管中隔成形术后到达颈内或颈外腔后单胎妊娠的产科预后良好。宫颈隔分裂与宫颈功能不全无关。(j妇科外科200xx:000)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The central forum for clinical articles dealing with all aspects of operative and office gynecology, including colposcopy, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, laser surgery, conventional surgery, female urology, microsurgery, in vitro fertilization, and infectious diseases. The Official Journal of the Gynecologic Surgery Society, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy, and the British Society for Cervical Pathology.
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous Perforation of Pyometra—What Literature Teaches Us? Clinical Significance of Polyp Findings in Endometrial Biopsies Predictors of Ovarian Preservation After Ovarian Torsion: A Retrospective Chart Review Comparative Study of Intraoperative Outcome Between Single Port Laparoscopic Hysterectomy And Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecological Disease: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Quadratus Lumborum Block in Gynecological Oncology Patients Undergoing Exploratory Laparotomy: A Retrospective Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1