Risk Budgeting portfolios: Existence and computation

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Mathematical Finance Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1111/mafi.12419
Adil Rengim Cetingoz, Jean-David Fermanian, Olivier Guéant
{"title":"Risk Budgeting portfolios: Existence and computation","authors":"Adil Rengim Cetingoz,&nbsp;Jean-David Fermanian,&nbsp;Olivier Guéant","doi":"10.1111/mafi.12419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modern portfolio theory has provided for decades the main framework for optimizing portfolios. Because of its sensitivity to small changes in input parameters, especially expected returns, the mean–variance framework proposed by Markowitz in 1952 has, however, been challenged by new construction methods that are purely based on risk. Among risk-based methods, the most popular ones are Minimum Variance, Maximum Diversification, and Risk Budgeting (especially Equal Risk Contribution) portfolios. Despite some drawbacks, Risk Budgeting is particularly attracting because of its versatility: based on Euler's homogeneous function theorem, it can indeed be used with a wide range of risk measures. This paper presents mathematical results regarding the existence and the uniqueness of Risk Budgeting portfolios for a very wide spectrum of risk measures and shows that, for many of them, computing the weights of Risk Budgeting portfolios only requires a standard stochastic algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":49867,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mafi.12419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern portfolio theory has provided for decades the main framework for optimizing portfolios. Because of its sensitivity to small changes in input parameters, especially expected returns, the mean–variance framework proposed by Markowitz in 1952 has, however, been challenged by new construction methods that are purely based on risk. Among risk-based methods, the most popular ones are Minimum Variance, Maximum Diversification, and Risk Budgeting (especially Equal Risk Contribution) portfolios. Despite some drawbacks, Risk Budgeting is particularly attracting because of its versatility: based on Euler's homogeneous function theorem, it can indeed be used with a wide range of risk measures. This paper presents mathematical results regarding the existence and the uniqueness of Risk Budgeting portfolios for a very wide spectrum of risk measures and shows that, for many of them, computing the weights of Risk Budgeting portfolios only requires a standard stochastic algorithm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险预算投资组合:存在与计算
几十年来,现代投资组合理论一直是优化投资组合的主要框架。马科维茨在 1952 年提出的均值-方差框架由于对输入参数(尤其是预期收益)的微小变化非常敏感,因此受到了纯粹基于风险的新构建方法的挑战。在基于风险的方法中,最流行的是最小方差法、最大分散法和风险预算法(尤其是等风险贡献法)投资组合。尽管有一些缺点,风险预算法因其多功能性而特别吸引人:基于欧拉同质函数定理,它确实可以用于各种风险度量。本文介绍了有关风险预算投资组合对于多种风险度量的存在性和唯一性的数学结果,并说明对于其中许多风险度量,计算风险预算投资组合的权重只需要一个标准的随机算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematical Finance
Mathematical Finance 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mathematical Finance seeks to publish original research articles focused on the development and application of novel mathematical and statistical methods for the analysis of financial problems. The journal welcomes contributions on new statistical methods for the analysis of financial problems. Empirical results will be appropriate to the extent that they illustrate a statistical technique, validate a model or provide insight into a financial problem. Papers whose main contribution rests on empirical results derived with standard approaches will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Designing stablecoins Systemic risk in markets with multiple central counterparties Joint calibration to SPX and VIX options with signature‐based models Dynamic equilibrium with insider information and general uninformed agent utility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1