Optimal Power Flow Analysis with Circulatory System-Based Optimization Algorithm

Hüseyin BAKIR
{"title":"Optimal Power Flow Analysis with Circulatory System-Based Optimization Algorithm","authors":"Hüseyin BAKIR","doi":"10.31127/tuje.1282429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimal power flow (OPF) is one of the most challenging optimization problems of power engineering. Owing to the high computational complexity of the OPF problem, a powerful and robust optimization algorithm is required to solve it. This paper has been centered on the optimization of OPF problem using circulatory system-based optimization (CSBO) algorithm. The solution quality of CSBO is compared with the recently introduced state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms i.e., artificial rabbits optimization (ARO), african vultures optimization algorithm (AVOA), and chaos game optimization (CGO). The practicability of the algorithms was evaluated on the IEEE-57 and 118-bus power networks for the optimization of various objectives, i.e., fuel cost, power loss, voltage deviation, and enhancement of voltage stability. Based on OPF results of the IEEE 57-bus power system, it is seen that the best fuel cost and voltage deviation results are calculated to be 41666.2344 $/h and 0.5871 p.u with the CSBO method. Given the OPF results of the IEEE 118-bus power network, it is observed that the CSBO algorithm presented the best fuel cost and active power loss values of 134934.3140 $/h, and 16.4688 MW. Moreover, OPF solutions obtained from 30 algorithm runs were analyzed using the Wilcoxon statistical test method. Consequently, the present paper reports that the CSBO algorithm produces better-quality OPF solutions compared to its competitors and other literature studies.","PeriodicalId":23377,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1282429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimal power flow (OPF) is one of the most challenging optimization problems of power engineering. Owing to the high computational complexity of the OPF problem, a powerful and robust optimization algorithm is required to solve it. This paper has been centered on the optimization of OPF problem using circulatory system-based optimization (CSBO) algorithm. The solution quality of CSBO is compared with the recently introduced state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms i.e., artificial rabbits optimization (ARO), african vultures optimization algorithm (AVOA), and chaos game optimization (CGO). The practicability of the algorithms was evaluated on the IEEE-57 and 118-bus power networks for the optimization of various objectives, i.e., fuel cost, power loss, voltage deviation, and enhancement of voltage stability. Based on OPF results of the IEEE 57-bus power system, it is seen that the best fuel cost and voltage deviation results are calculated to be 41666.2344 $/h and 0.5871 p.u with the CSBO method. Given the OPF results of the IEEE 118-bus power network, it is observed that the CSBO algorithm presented the best fuel cost and active power loss values of 134934.3140 $/h, and 16.4688 MW. Moreover, OPF solutions obtained from 30 algorithm runs were analyzed using the Wilcoxon statistical test method. Consequently, the present paper reports that the CSBO algorithm produces better-quality OPF solutions compared to its competitors and other literature studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于循环系统优化算法的最优潮流分析
最优潮流是电力工程中最具挑战性的优化问题之一。由于OPF问题的计算复杂度很高,需要一种强大的鲁棒优化算法来求解。本文主要研究了基于循环系统优化(CSBO)算法的OPF优化问题。将CSBO的解质量与最近引入的最先进的元启发式算法,即人造兔子优化算法(ARO)、非洲秃鹫优化算法(AVOA)和混沌博弈优化算法(CGO)进行了比较。在IEEE-57和118母线电网上对算法的实用性进行了评估,以优化燃料成本、功率损耗、电压偏差和增强电压稳定性等多个目标。基于IEEE 57总线电力系统的OPF结果可以看出,采用CSBO方法计算得到的最佳燃料成本和电压偏差分别为41666.2344美元/h和0.5871 p.u。结合IEEE 118总线电网的OPF结果可知,CSBO算法的燃油成本和有功损耗分别为134934.3140 $/h和16.4688 MW,最优。利用Wilcoxon统计检验方法对30次算法运行得到的OPF解进行分析。因此,本文报告了CSBO算法比其竞争对手和其他文献研究产生更好质量的OPF解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Solution‐Based Fabrication of Copper Oxide Thin Film Influence of Transition Metal (Cobalt) Doping on Structural, Morphological, Electrical, and Optical Properties Optimal Power Flow Analysis with Circulatory System-Based Optimization Algorithm Counterface Soil Type and Loading Condition Effects on Granular/Cohesive Soil – Geofoam Interface Shear Behavior Comparison of CNN-Based Methods for Yoga Pose Classification Prediction of elevation points using three different heuristic regression techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1