Oligarchic Politics in the Context of a Democratic Rule of Law in Relation to the Principle of Expediency

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.2478/jles-2023-0012
Ahmad Rifai Suftyadi, Dini Dewi Heniarti, A Harits Nu’man
{"title":"Oligarchic Politics in the Context of a Democratic Rule of Law in Relation to the Principle of Expediency","authors":"Ahmad Rifai Suftyadi, Dini Dewi Heniarti, A Harits Nu’man","doi":"10.2478/jles-2023-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Indonesia, which is a democratic country, is not necessarily free from the practice of ownership of a handful of groups that influence the course of the National constitution. Oligarchy begins with the fact that extreme material inequality produces extreme political inequality. Although in a democracy, position and access to the political process are interpreted as equal, the enormous wealth in the hands of a small minority creates a significant excess of power in the political sphere for that group. The practice of oligarchic politics in Indonesia has been prominent and widespread since the New Order era. Oligarchy has undermined the philosophical meaning of democracy, which is political power or government run by the people, and for the people. Freedom in the political field certainly does not mean legalizing all means but remains in the corridor as contained in Pancasila as the basic ideology of the Indonesian nation. The good and bad of the law must be measured by the good and bad consequences produced by the application of the law, meaning that legal provisions can be considered good and provide benefits if the consequences resulting from their application are good, maximum happiness, and reduced suffering.","PeriodicalId":47756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2023-0012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Indonesia, which is a democratic country, is not necessarily free from the practice of ownership of a handful of groups that influence the course of the National constitution. Oligarchy begins with the fact that extreme material inequality produces extreme political inequality. Although in a democracy, position and access to the political process are interpreted as equal, the enormous wealth in the hands of a small minority creates a significant excess of power in the political sphere for that group. The practice of oligarchic politics in Indonesia has been prominent and widespread since the New Order era. Oligarchy has undermined the philosophical meaning of democracy, which is political power or government run by the people, and for the people. Freedom in the political field certainly does not mean legalizing all means but remains in the corridor as contained in Pancasila as the basic ideology of the Indonesian nation. The good and bad of the law must be measured by the good and bad consequences produced by the application of the law, meaning that legal provisions can be considered good and provide benefits if the consequences resulting from their application are good, maximum happiness, and reduced suffering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民主法治背景下的寡头政治与权宜之计原则的关系
印度尼西亚是一个民主国家,但它并不一定能摆脱少数影响国家宪法进程的团体的所有权实践。寡头政治始于极端的物质不平等导致极端的政治不平等。虽然在民主国家,地位和参与政治进程的机会被解释为平等,但少数人手中的巨额财富使该群体在政治领域的权力大大过剩。印尼的寡头政治实践自新秩序时代以来就十分突出和普遍。寡头政治破坏了民主的哲学意义,即政治权力或政府由人民管理,为人民服务。政治领域的自由当然并不意味着使所有手段合法化,而是作为印度尼西亚民族基本意识形态的潘卡西拉所包含的走廊。法律的好与坏必须由法律的应用所产生的好与坏的结果来衡量,这意味着如果法律条款的应用所产生的结果是好的、最大的幸福和减少的痛苦,那么法律条款就可以被认为是好的,并提供利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Studies is a journal of interdisciplinary academic research into law and legal institutions. It emphasizes social science approaches, especially those of economics, political science, and psychology, but it also publishes the work of historians, philosophers, and others who are interested in legal theory. The JLS was founded in 1972.
期刊最新文献
Forensic Science Integration in Legal Education: A Paradigm Shift for Strengthening Legal Expertise in Pakistan QUO Quadis Romanian Education? Brief Introspection Tax Evasion Between Tax Optimization at the Border of Legality, Tax Burden and Voluntary Compliance Genesis of Legal Regulation of Pre-Trial Detention in Sweden and Ukraine: Comparative Analysis Oligarchic Politics in the Context of a Democratic Rule of Law in Relation to the Principle of Expediency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1