Marx for Primitives

Peter Kulchyski
{"title":"Marx for Primitives","authors":"Peter Kulchyski","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2023.2251336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis analysis of Karl Marx centers one of his earliest political writings, the 1842 commentary on the Rhine Province Assembly debate on the Law on Thefts of Wood, to show an anthropological thread in his writings and this thread’s relevance to the struggles of Indigenous gathering and hunting peoples in the contemporary historical conjuncture. This “bush Marx” or “Marx for primitives” consistently engaged in a deep structural linguistic subversion, challenging ethnocentrism by turning Eurocentric concepts on their head.Key Words: AnthropologyEthnocentrismEurocentrismIndigenous RightsKarl Marx Notes1 Or of E. P. Thompson’s (Citation1993) conception, especially in his essay on the imposition of time and work discipline and his extensive discussion of the deployment of customary rights by those struggling against dispossession","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2023.2251336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis analysis of Karl Marx centers one of his earliest political writings, the 1842 commentary on the Rhine Province Assembly debate on the Law on Thefts of Wood, to show an anthropological thread in his writings and this thread’s relevance to the struggles of Indigenous gathering and hunting peoples in the contemporary historical conjuncture. This “bush Marx” or “Marx for primitives” consistently engaged in a deep structural linguistic subversion, challenging ethnocentrism by turning Eurocentric concepts on their head.Key Words: AnthropologyEthnocentrismEurocentrismIndigenous RightsKarl Marx Notes1 Or of E. P. Thompson’s (Citation1993) conception, especially in his essay on the imposition of time and work discipline and his extensive discussion of the deployment of customary rights by those struggling against dispossession
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马克思论原始人
摘要本文以卡尔·马克思最早的政治著作之一——1842年对莱茵省议会关于《盗伐木材法》辩论的评注——为中心进行分析,以揭示马克思著作中的人类学脉络,以及这条脉络与当代历史背景下土著采集和狩猎民族斗争的关联。这种“丛林马克思”或“原始人的马克思”一贯从事一种深刻的结构性语言颠覆,通过颠覆欧洲中心主义的概念来挑战种族中心主义。[关键词]人类学,民族中心主义,欧洲中心主义,土著权利卡尔·马克思注1或e·p·汤普森(citation . 1993)的概念,特别是在他关于强加时间和工作纪律的文章中,以及他对那些为反对剥夺而斗争的人部署习惯权利的广泛讨论中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The Vulgar (in) Marxism: Vacillating between Exchange and Production Toward a Vulgar Transgender Marxism Vulgar, Crude, Foolish: Brecht, Teaching, Fascism Airbrushing Out Revolutionary Social Democracy: Lenin, Stalin, and Potresov on the Second International Editors’ Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1