Ecology of Virtual Learning Environment in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences from Students' Viewpoint

Jafari H, Abbasi-Shavazi M, Jambarsang S, Ehrampoush MH, Ghaneiyan MT, Keshmiri F
{"title":"Ecology of Virtual Learning Environment in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences from Students' Viewpoint","authors":"Jafari H, Abbasi-Shavazi M, Jambarsang S, Ehrampoush MH, Ghaneiyan MT, Keshmiri F","doi":"10.18502/jmed.v18i2.13665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to assess the ecological status of the educational environment (online) from the perspective of students in the school of PublicHealth at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences.
 Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study involving 287 undergraduate, graduate, and Ph.D. students from the School of Health, enterd via stratified random sampling. Two questionnaires about the online learning environments that were developed by Kaufmann and Chou were used in the study. The Kaufmann questionnaire included four domains: “instructor behaviors, student connectedness, course structure, and Course Clarity” and Chou’s questionnaire included three domains: \"Learning climate, and learning satisfaction\". Data were analyzed by SPSS 21 software.
 Results: Our findings indicate that students viewed the ecological status of the online learning environment as moderate level. The domain ability and learning environment received a score of 3.2 ± 0.62, satisfaction with learning was rated 3.07 ± 0.73, and general learning atmosphere received a score of 3.05 ± 0.73. The teacher's behavior received 3.8 ± 0.83, the structure of the training course 2.92 ± 1.12, the ease of implementation 3.14±0.98, and the interaction of learners 3.66 ± 0.85.
 Conclusion: Online teaching and learning is a complex process that involves various factors such as the instructor's skills, inclusiveness, course structure, and educational design. The ease of implementation and interaction of learners are also important in the learning ecology. Therefore, it is essential to have the necessary infrastructure that facilitates the teaching-learning process when planning for the creation and development of online education.","PeriodicalId":30509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmed.v18i2.13665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the ecological status of the educational environment (online) from the perspective of students in the school of PublicHealth at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study involving 287 undergraduate, graduate, and Ph.D. students from the School of Health, enterd via stratified random sampling. Two questionnaires about the online learning environments that were developed by Kaufmann and Chou were used in the study. The Kaufmann questionnaire included four domains: “instructor behaviors, student connectedness, course structure, and Course Clarity” and Chou’s questionnaire included three domains: "Learning climate, and learning satisfaction". Data were analyzed by SPSS 21 software. Results: Our findings indicate that students viewed the ecological status of the online learning environment as moderate level. The domain ability and learning environment received a score of 3.2 ± 0.62, satisfaction with learning was rated 3.07 ± 0.73, and general learning atmosphere received a score of 3.05 ± 0.73. The teacher's behavior received 3.8 ± 0.83, the structure of the training course 2.92 ± 1.12, the ease of implementation 3.14±0.98, and the interaction of learners 3.66 ± 0.85. Conclusion: Online teaching and learning is a complex process that involves various factors such as the instructor's skills, inclusiveness, course structure, and educational design. The ease of implementation and interaction of learners are also important in the learning ecology. Therefore, it is essential to have the necessary infrastructure that facilitates the teaching-learning process when planning for the creation and development of online education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从学生的角度看沙希德·萨杜吉医科大学虚拟学习环境的生态学
前言:本研究旨在从Shahid Sadoughi医科大学公共卫生学院学生的角度评估教育环境(在线)的生态状况。 方法:采用分层随机抽样的方法,对287名卫生学院本科生、研究生和博士生进行描述性横断面研究。本研究使用了Kaufmann和Chou开发的两份关于在线学习环境的问卷。考夫曼问卷包括四个领域:“教师行为、学生连通性、课程结构和课程清晰度”,周问卷包括三个领域:“学习氛围和学习满意度”。数据采用SPSS 21软件进行分析。 结果:我们的研究结果表明,学生认为网络学习环境的生态状况为中等水平。领域能力和学习环境得分为3.2±0.62分,学习满意度得分为3.07±0.73分,总体学习氛围得分为3.05±0.73分。教师行为得分为3.8±0.83,培训课程结构得分为2.92±1.12,可实施性得分为3.14±0.98,学习者互动得分为3.66±0.85。 结论:在线教学是一个复杂的过程,涉及到教师的技能、包容性、课程结构和教育设计等多种因素。在学习生态中,学习者的易操作性和互动性也很重要。因此,在规划创建和发展在线教育时,必须有必要的基础设施来促进教学过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Game-Based Learning for Soft Skills Using the Peer Learning Method in the E-learning Process: Creating a Support-Motivational Mechanism for the Parasitology MS Students in Shahid Sadougi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd E-learning Quality Assessment Indicators: A Narrative Review ChatGPT in writing scientific articles: friend or foe? Explaining Medical Students' Experiences of the Challenges of Clinical Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Qualitative Content Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1