Palace, Prison, Park or Palimpsest? The Contested Heritage of the Former Palace of Chiang Mai

Q3 Arts and Humanities Manusya Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1163/26659077-26010008
Worrasit Tantinipankul
{"title":"Palace, Prison, Park or Palimpsest? The Contested Heritage of the Former Palace of Chiang Mai","authors":"Worrasit Tantinipankul","doi":"10.1163/26659077-26010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper investigates the contestations between state and local actors over the interpretation of a state prison built in the grounds of the Chiang Mai palace, known as Wiang Kaew. Engaging with postcolonial approaches to heritage interpretation, this paper argues that the local movement calling for the removal of the prison in favor of a public park represents an effort to reclaim local Lan Na history and identity from the national past. Using the critical heritage concept of “authorized heritage discourse” (Smith 2006), I show how central Thai authorities—including the Fine Arts Department and the Buddhist Sangha—have privileged nationalist interpretations of the site over the intangible meanings and values expressed by the local community. The paper concludes by suggesting how newer frameworks of heritage management might be harnessed to resolve the conflict by recognizing the site as a historical palimpsest with multiple layers of value and meaning.","PeriodicalId":36735,"journal":{"name":"Manusya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manusya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-26010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the contestations between state and local actors over the interpretation of a state prison built in the grounds of the Chiang Mai palace, known as Wiang Kaew. Engaging with postcolonial approaches to heritage interpretation, this paper argues that the local movement calling for the removal of the prison in favor of a public park represents an effort to reclaim local Lan Na history and identity from the national past. Using the critical heritage concept of “authorized heritage discourse” (Smith 2006), I show how central Thai authorities—including the Fine Arts Department and the Buddhist Sangha—have privileged nationalist interpretations of the site over the intangible meanings and values expressed by the local community. The paper concludes by suggesting how newer frameworks of heritage management might be harnessed to resolve the conflict by recognizing the site as a historical palimpsest with multiple layers of value and meaning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫殿、监狱、公园还是重写本?有争议的前清迈宫殿遗产
摘要本文调查了国家和地方行为者之间关于在清迈宫殿(被称为Wiang Kaew)的土地上建造的国家监狱的解释的争论。本文采用后殖民主义的遗产解释方法,认为当地要求拆除监狱以建设公园的运动代表了从国家过去中收回当地兰纳历史和身份的努力。使用“授权遗产话语”的关键遗产概念(Smith 2006),我展示了泰国中央当局-包括美术部门和佛教僧伽-如何将该遗址的民族主义解释置于当地社区表达的无形意义和价值之上。论文最后提出了如何利用新的遗产管理框架来解决冲突的建议,即承认该遗址是具有多层价值和意义的历史重写本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Manusya
Manusya Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
A Corpus-Based Study of the Reflexive Form Tua-eng ‘Self’ in Thai Palace, Prison, Park or Palimpsest? The Contested Heritage of the Former Palace of Chiang Mai A Corpus-Based Study of the Order of Adjectives in Japanese Antonym Sequences: The Role of Markedness and Frequency Locke’s Distinction Between Primary and Secondary Qualities as Partly Correlated with Kant’s Account of The Thing in Itself The Brigands’ Song among the Ngạn People in Northern Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1