Sustainability communication: how to communicate an inconvenient truth in the era of scientific mistrust

IF 3.1 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Communication Management Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1108/jcom-05-2022-0060
Denise Voci, Matthias Karmasin
{"title":"Sustainability communication: how to communicate an inconvenient truth in the era of scientific mistrust","authors":"Denise Voci, Matthias Karmasin","doi":"10.1108/jcom-05-2022-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This conceptual paper aims to explore the current state of sustainability communication research, focusing on the challenges of communicating inconvenient truths in an era of scientific mistrust. Therefore, this study aims to (1) examine the existing research landscape in sustainability communication, (2) identify unresolved problems and challenges, and (3) propose strategies for counteract misinformation through targeted communication. Design/methodology/approach For this, the authors conducted a critical literature review and analyzed the resulting sample ( n = 473 journal articles) by means of qualitative content analysis to (1) evaluate existing communication approaches dealing with the communication of sustainability's inconvenient truth, (2) identify stakeholder groups involved in sustainability communication, (3) discuss limitations of current communication approaches and (4) present recommendations on (more) effective communication strategies to address the unresolved issues in sustainability communication. Findings The analysis reveals that when it comes to sustainability communication and its unresolved problems, literature refers to four key stakeholder groups: (1) science deniers; (2) adaptation skeptics; (3) whitewashers and (4) world saviors. Furthermore, the analysis provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics involved in communicating sustainability, emphasizes the need for tailored approaches to engage and address the concerns of each stakeholder group, and exposes limitations in current communication methods and approaches. Accordingly, the analysis highlights the necessity of developing new theories, models and methods specific to sustainability communication to tackle its unique challenges effectively. Research limitations/implications Like our society, communication sciences need a fundamental transformation to meet sustainability communication's new challenges induced by the necessary shift toward sustainable development. Originality/value This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of sustainability communication in research, specifically addressing the challenges of effectively communicating unpleasant news in the context of scientific mistrust. It fills a gap in existing literature by examining the progress made in addressing these issues and identifying the emerging challenges that need to be addressed.","PeriodicalId":51660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Management","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-05-2022-0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This conceptual paper aims to explore the current state of sustainability communication research, focusing on the challenges of communicating inconvenient truths in an era of scientific mistrust. Therefore, this study aims to (1) examine the existing research landscape in sustainability communication, (2) identify unresolved problems and challenges, and (3) propose strategies for counteract misinformation through targeted communication. Design/methodology/approach For this, the authors conducted a critical literature review and analyzed the resulting sample ( n = 473 journal articles) by means of qualitative content analysis to (1) evaluate existing communication approaches dealing with the communication of sustainability's inconvenient truth, (2) identify stakeholder groups involved in sustainability communication, (3) discuss limitations of current communication approaches and (4) present recommendations on (more) effective communication strategies to address the unresolved issues in sustainability communication. Findings The analysis reveals that when it comes to sustainability communication and its unresolved problems, literature refers to four key stakeholder groups: (1) science deniers; (2) adaptation skeptics; (3) whitewashers and (4) world saviors. Furthermore, the analysis provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics involved in communicating sustainability, emphasizes the need for tailored approaches to engage and address the concerns of each stakeholder group, and exposes limitations in current communication methods and approaches. Accordingly, the analysis highlights the necessity of developing new theories, models and methods specific to sustainability communication to tackle its unique challenges effectively. Research limitations/implications Like our society, communication sciences need a fundamental transformation to meet sustainability communication's new challenges induced by the necessary shift toward sustainable development. Originality/value This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of sustainability communication in research, specifically addressing the challenges of effectively communicating unpleasant news in the context of scientific mistrust. It fills a gap in existing literature by examining the progress made in addressing these issues and identifying the emerging challenges that need to be addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续性传播:如何在科学不信任的时代传播难以忽视的真相
本概念性论文旨在探讨可持续传播研究的现状,重点关注在科学不信任时代传播难以忽视的真相所面临的挑战。因此,本研究旨在(1)研究可持续传播的现有研究格局,(2)找出尚未解决的问题和挑战,(3)提出通过有针对性的传播来抵消错误信息的策略。为此,作者进行了批判性文献综述,并通过定性内容分析对所得样本(n = 473篇期刊文章)进行了分析,以(1)评估处理可持续性难以忽视的真相传播的现有传播方法,(2)确定参与可持续性传播的利益相关者群体,(3)讨论当前沟通方法的局限性,(4)提出(更)有效的沟通策略建议,以解决可持续性沟通中未解决的问题。分析发现,当涉及到可持续传播及其未解决的问题时,文献指的是四个关键利益相关者群体:(1)科学否认者;(2)适应怀疑论者;(3)洗白者(4)世界救星。此外,该分析还对可持续性沟通所涉及的复杂动态提供了有价值的见解,强调需要量身定制的方法来吸引和解决每个利益相关者群体的关注,并暴露了当前沟通方法和方法的局限性。因此,分析强调了发展新的理论、模型和方法的必要性,以有效地解决可持续发展传播的独特挑战。与我们的社会一样,传播科学需要进行根本性的变革,以应对可持续发展所带来的可持续传播的新挑战。本文全面概述了研究中可持续性传播的现状,具体解决了在科学不信任的背景下有效传播不愉快消息的挑战。它通过审查在解决这些问题方面取得的进展和确定需要解决的新挑战,填补了现有文献的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Subjective well-being perceptions of Portuguese Public Relations practitioners: a gender and stages of life analysis Loneliness, office space arrangement and mental well-being of Gen Z PR professionals. Falling into the trap of an agile office? The influence of leaders’ motivational language on employee well-being through relatedness in remote work environments Subjective well-being of public relations and communication professionals in the context of perceived organisational support Understanding subjective well-being across a multi-generational workforce in public relations: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1