Efficacy of Manual Vacuum Aspiration versus Dilatation and Curettage in First Trimester Miscarriages

Q4 Health Professions Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v73i5.7201
None Hira Sikander, None Shazia Mahmood Awan, Sanum Kashif
{"title":"Efficacy of Manual Vacuum Aspiration versus Dilatation and Curettage in First Trimester Miscarriages","authors":"None Hira Sikander, None Shazia Mahmood Awan, Sanum Kashif","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v73i5.7201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) with Dilatation and Curettage (DNC) in miscarriages of the first trimester.\nStudy Design: Quasi-experimental study.\nPlace and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CMH, Peshawar Pakistan, from Feb to Aug 2018.\nMethodology: A total number of 182 Adult female (20-35 years of age) patients having miscarriage during the first trimester who were either primigravida or with previous history of spontaneous vaginal delivery were included in this study. Patients were assigned randomly into Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) and Dilatation and Curettage (DNC) groups using the draw randomization technique. Data regarding the efficacy of both procedures and procedural success rate was measured in all patients.\nResults: A total of 182 Adult female patients, with a mean age of 30.53+5.23 years, having miscarriage in the first trimester, were evaluated. The mean gestational age at the time of abortion was 8.64+1.30 weeks, and the mean parity of study females was 1.96±0.82. The procedure was successfully done in 87(95.6%) patients in the MVA Group versus 84(92.3%) in the D&C Group (p-value 0.35).\nConclusion: Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) is an effective and safe method of abortion with a success rate comparable to that of Dilatation and Curettage (D&C).","PeriodicalId":31059,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i5.7201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) with Dilatation and Curettage (DNC) in miscarriages of the first trimester. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CMH, Peshawar Pakistan, from Feb to Aug 2018. Methodology: A total number of 182 Adult female (20-35 years of age) patients having miscarriage during the first trimester who were either primigravida or with previous history of spontaneous vaginal delivery were included in this study. Patients were assigned randomly into Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) and Dilatation and Curettage (DNC) groups using the draw randomization technique. Data regarding the efficacy of both procedures and procedural success rate was measured in all patients. Results: A total of 182 Adult female patients, with a mean age of 30.53+5.23 years, having miscarriage in the first trimester, were evaluated. The mean gestational age at the time of abortion was 8.64+1.30 weeks, and the mean parity of study females was 1.96±0.82. The procedure was successfully done in 87(95.6%) patients in the MVA Group versus 84(92.3%) in the D&C Group (p-value 0.35). Conclusion: Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) is an effective and safe method of abortion with a success rate comparable to that of Dilatation and Curettage (D&C).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工真空抽吸与扩张刮宫术在早期妊娠流产中的疗效比较
目的:比较人工真空抽吸(MVA)与扩张刮宫(DNC)治疗早期妊娠流产的疗效。研究设计:准实验研究。学习地点和时间:2018年2月至8月,巴基斯坦白沙瓦CMH妇产科。方法:本研究共纳入182例在妊娠早期流产的成年女性(20-35岁),她们要么是初产妇,要么有阴道自然分娩史。采用抽签随机化技术将患者随机分为手动真空抽吸(MVA)组和扩张刮刮(DNC)组。在所有患者中测量两种手术的疗效和手术成功率。结果:共纳入182例妊娠早期流产的成年女性患者,平均年龄30.53+5.23岁。流产时平均胎龄为8.64±1.30周,平均胎次为1.96±0.82。MVA组87例(95.6%)患者成功完成手术,而D&C组84例(92.3%)(p值0.35)。结论:人工真空抽吸(MVA)是一种安全有效的人工流产方法,其成功率与宫内扩张刮宫术(D&C)相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Audit on the Quality of Pre-Anaesthesia Assessment based on Predefined Pre-anaesthesia Assessment Form Dyslipidaemia In Acute Non-Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke Patients At A Tertiary Care Center Differential Impact of Subcutaneous Neurokinin B Administration on Epididymal Proliferation in Adult New Zealand White Rabbits: A Dose-Dependent Study Association of Tumour Budding With Histological Type And Grade, Pathological Stage And Lymph Node Metastasis In Colorectal Carcinoma Pattern Of Maxillofacial Fractures In Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1