Comparison between T2 Turbo Inversion Recovery Magnitude and T2 Frequency Selective Fat Saturation Turbo Spin Echo MRI Sequences in Detection of Perianal Fistula

IF 1.7 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.3991/ijoe.v19i14.42557
Noor Fadhil Baqir, Rasha Sabeeh Ahmed, Khaleel Ibraheem Mohsen
{"title":"Comparison between T2 Turbo Inversion Recovery Magnitude and T2 Frequency Selective Fat Saturation Turbo Spin Echo MRI Sequences in Detection of Perianal Fistula","authors":"Noor Fadhil Baqir, Rasha Sabeeh Ahmed, Khaleel Ibraheem Mohsen","doi":"10.3991/ijoe.v19i14.42557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences are routinely included in the MRI protocol for patients with perianal fistula to improve the visibility of the abnormal tracts and abscesses against the background of hypo-signal intensity on the image. The objective of this study is to compare the turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) and frequency selective fat saturation turbo spin echo (FSTSE) MRI sequences in detecting perianal fistulas in terms of time and clarity. The MRI protocol included a coronal T2 turbo inversion recovery magnitude sequence, a T2 fat saturation turbo spin echo, and T2 turbo inversion recovery magnitude sequences in the axial plane. The evaluation of sequence image quality involved calculating the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Additionally three radiologists assessed the best image using a questionnaire designed to align with the study’s objectives. The T2 TIRM sequence was found to have the highest number of ticked images. The inter-rater kappa agreement showed fair agreement (k = 0.370) between the raters. However, the SNR and CNR values for the T2 FSTSE were higher than those of the T2 TIRM sequence, with a p-value less than 0.001. There is a significant difference in the meantime in that the T2 TIRM sequence has less time than the T2 FSTSE with a p-value < 0.001. Due to its uniform fat suppression in the MR image and shorter acquisition time, the turbo inversion recovery magnitude sequence exhibited superior performance compared to the T2 frequency-selective turbo spin echo sequence.","PeriodicalId":36900,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i14.42557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences are routinely included in the MRI protocol for patients with perianal fistula to improve the visibility of the abnormal tracts and abscesses against the background of hypo-signal intensity on the image. The objective of this study is to compare the turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) and frequency selective fat saturation turbo spin echo (FSTSE) MRI sequences in detecting perianal fistulas in terms of time and clarity. The MRI protocol included a coronal T2 turbo inversion recovery magnitude sequence, a T2 fat saturation turbo spin echo, and T2 turbo inversion recovery magnitude sequences in the axial plane. The evaluation of sequence image quality involved calculating the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Additionally three radiologists assessed the best image using a questionnaire designed to align with the study’s objectives. The T2 TIRM sequence was found to have the highest number of ticked images. The inter-rater kappa agreement showed fair agreement (k = 0.370) between the raters. However, the SNR and CNR values for the T2 FSTSE were higher than those of the T2 TIRM sequence, with a p-value less than 0.001. There is a significant difference in the meantime in that the T2 TIRM sequence has less time than the T2 FSTSE with a p-value < 0.001. Due to its uniform fat suppression in the MR image and shorter acquisition time, the turbo inversion recovery magnitude sequence exhibited superior performance compared to the T2 frequency-selective turbo spin echo sequence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T2 Turbo反转恢复幅度与T2频率选择性脂肪饱和Turbo自旋回波MRI序列检测肛周瘘的比较
脂肪抑制磁共振成像(MRI)序列被常规纳入肛周瘘患者的MRI方案,以提高在图像低信号强度背景下异常束和脓肿的可见性。本研究的目的是比较涡轮反转恢复幅度(TIRM)和频率选择性脂肪饱和涡轮自旋回波(FSTSE) MRI序列在检测肛周瘘管方面的时间和清晰度。MRI方案包括冠状面T2涡轮反转恢复幅度序列、T2脂肪饱和涡轮自旋回波和轴向面T2涡轮反转恢复幅度序列。序列图像质量的评价涉及到信噪比(SNR)和噪声对比比(CNR)的计算。此外,三名放射科医生使用与研究目标一致的问卷来评估最佳图像。T2 TIRM序列被标记的图像数量最多。评分者间kappa一致性显示评分者之间的一致性比较公平(k = 0.370)。但T2 FSTSE序列的信噪比和CNR值均高于T2 TIRM序列,p值均小于0.001。同时,T2的TIRM序列比T2的FSTSE序列时间短,p值为<0.001. 由于其在MR图像中的均匀脂肪抑制和较短的采集时间,涡轮反转恢复幅度序列与T2频率选择性涡轮自旋回波序列相比表现出更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
46.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Modification of an IMU Based System for Analyzing Hand Kinematics During Activities of Daily Living 3D Pre-Processing Algorithm for MRI Images of Different Stages of AD Segmentation of Retinal Images Using Improved Segmentation Network, MesU-Net Recent Biomaterial Developments for Bone Tissue Engineering and Potential Clinical Application: Narrative Review of the Literature Brain Tumor Localization Using N-Cut
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1