Who Cares? Paid Sick Leave Mandates, Caregiving, and Gender

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE National Tax Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/725876
Tanya Byker, Elena Patel, Shanthi Ramnath
{"title":"Who Cares? Paid Sick Leave Mandates, Caregiving, and Gender","authors":"Tanya Byker, Elena Patel, Shanthi Ramnath","doi":"10.1086/725876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use employment data from the Current Population Survey to assess the efficacy of state-mandated paid sick leave policies on leave-taking behavior. We find that these policies increase leave-taking for caregiving for men by 10–20 percent, and this effect is strongest for men with young children. In addition, Hispanic men and men without a bachelor’s degree, who historically have had low access to paid sick leave, are 20–25 percent more likely to take caregiving leave. By comparison, these policies do not affect leave-taking for own sickness, nor do these policies affect leave-taking for caregiving among women.","PeriodicalId":18983,"journal":{"name":"National Tax Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Tax Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We use employment data from the Current Population Survey to assess the efficacy of state-mandated paid sick leave policies on leave-taking behavior. We find that these policies increase leave-taking for caregiving for men by 10–20 percent, and this effect is strongest for men with young children. In addition, Hispanic men and men without a bachelor’s degree, who historically have had low access to paid sick leave, are 20–25 percent more likely to take caregiving leave. By comparison, these policies do not affect leave-taking for own sickness, nor do these policies affect leave-taking for caregiving among women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁在乎呢?带薪病假规定、护理和性别
我们使用来自当前人口调查的就业数据来评估国家强制带薪病假政策对请假行为的有效性。我们发现,这些政策使男性因照顾孩子而请假的时间增加了10 - 20%,这种影响对有小孩的男性最为明显。此外,西班牙裔男性和没有学士学位的男性,在历史上很少有机会获得带薪病假,他们休护理假的可能性要高出20%至25%。相比之下,这些政策不影响因病请假,也不影响妇女因照顾他人而请假。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The goal of the National Tax Journal (NTJ) is to encourage and disseminate high quality original research on governmental tax and expenditure policies. Articles published in the regular March, June and September issues of the journal, as well as articles accepted for publication in special issues of the journal, are subject to professional peer review and include economic, theoretical, and empirical analyses of tax and expenditure issues with an emphasis on policy implications. The NTJ has been published quarterly since 1948 under the auspices of the National Tax Association (NTA). Most issues include an NTJ Forum, which consists of invited papers by leading scholars that examine in depth a single current tax or expenditure policy issue. The December issue is devoted to publishing papers presented at the NTA’s annual Spring Symposium; the articles in the December issue generally are not subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
Territorial Tax Reform and Profit Shifting by Us and Japanese Multinationals Public Housing Authorities’ Housing Choice Voucher Policies Can Affect SSI Participation Three Decades of Tax Analysis, 1992–2022 Agenda-Setting and Tax Referenda: Implications for Regression Discontinuity Identification Strategy Using Election Outcomes Automated Tax Filing: Simulating a PrePopulated Form 1040
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1