Participatory rangeland management: A vehicle for pastoralist women’s empowerment in Ethiopia

IF 1.7 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pastoralism-Research Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1186/s13570-023-00286-4
Fiona Flintan, Bedasa Eba
{"title":"Participatory rangeland management: A vehicle for pastoralist women’s empowerment in Ethiopia","authors":"Fiona Flintan, Bedasa Eba","doi":"10.1186/s13570-023-00286-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pastoralist tenure systems are highly complex. Where customary institutions are functioning well, pastoralist women access and use resources as a member of a pastoralist group. Although policy and legislation call for more equity across societies, providing individual titles to women is not necessarily the answer. Strengthening women’s rights within the collective society while also supporting women’s capacities and abilities to participate meaningfully in decision-making processes and hold leadership positions will support more sustainable gender equality outcomes. Participatory rangeland management (PRM) is an approach developed in Ethiopia in 2010 that was then piloted by non-governmental organisations in several parts of the country in a bid to improve the security of tenure and good governance of rangelands, more inclusive participation of pastoralists in decisions pertaining to their lands and improve rangeland productivity. While not an explicit aim, it also sought women’s empowerment as part of the participatory process. A review of PRM implementation in Oromia and Afar regions, Ethiopia, showed that in the majority of cases, women participated equally with men in the PRM process. Women’s and men’s opinions on the involvement and satisfaction of PRM implementation activities were compared favourably. Overall, community members believed that PRM has improved women’s roles in rangeland management leadership and decision-making processes and their access to rangeland resources, thereby encouraging a transformative process of improving gender equality and women’s empowerment in pastoralist societies. This article considers the implications of these results for pastoral women and to what degree they have contributed to their empowerment. A conceptualised women’s empowerment framework is used for the analysis.","PeriodicalId":46166,"journal":{"name":"Pastoralism-Research Policy and Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pastoralism-Research Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-023-00286-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Pastoralist tenure systems are highly complex. Where customary institutions are functioning well, pastoralist women access and use resources as a member of a pastoralist group. Although policy and legislation call for more equity across societies, providing individual titles to women is not necessarily the answer. Strengthening women’s rights within the collective society while also supporting women’s capacities and abilities to participate meaningfully in decision-making processes and hold leadership positions will support more sustainable gender equality outcomes. Participatory rangeland management (PRM) is an approach developed in Ethiopia in 2010 that was then piloted by non-governmental organisations in several parts of the country in a bid to improve the security of tenure and good governance of rangelands, more inclusive participation of pastoralists in decisions pertaining to their lands and improve rangeland productivity. While not an explicit aim, it also sought women’s empowerment as part of the participatory process. A review of PRM implementation in Oromia and Afar regions, Ethiopia, showed that in the majority of cases, women participated equally with men in the PRM process. Women’s and men’s opinions on the involvement and satisfaction of PRM implementation activities were compared favourably. Overall, community members believed that PRM has improved women’s roles in rangeland management leadership and decision-making processes and their access to rangeland resources, thereby encouraging a transformative process of improving gender equality and women’s empowerment in pastoralist societies. This article considers the implications of these results for pastoral women and to what degree they have contributed to their empowerment. A conceptualised women’s empowerment framework is used for the analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与式牧场管理:埃塞俄比亚牧民妇女赋权的工具
牧民权属制度非常复杂。在习惯机构运作良好的地方,牧民妇女可以作为牧民群体的成员获得和使用资源。尽管政策和立法呼吁在整个社会中实现更多的平等,但为女性提供个人头衔并不一定是答案。加强妇女在集体社会中的权利,同时支持妇女有意义地参与决策进程和担任领导职务的能力,将有助于实现更可持续的性别平等成果。参与式牧场管理(PRM)是2010年在埃塞俄比亚开发的一种方法,随后由非政府组织在该国的几个地区进行了试点,旨在改善牧场使用权的保障和良好治理,让牧民更包容地参与与其土地有关的决策,并提高牧场生产力。虽然不是一个明确的目标,但它也寻求将赋予妇女权力作为参与进程的一部分。对埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚和阿法尔地区人口方案管理执行情况的审查表明,在大多数情况下,妇女与男子平等地参与人口方案管理进程。妇女和男子对方案管理执行活动的参与和满意度的看法比较有利。总体而言,社区成员认为,PRM改善了妇女在牧场管理领导和决策过程中的作用,以及她们获得牧场资源的机会,从而鼓励了改善游牧社会性别平等和赋予妇女权力的变革进程。本文考虑了这些结果对牧养妇女的影响,以及她们在多大程度上促进了她们的赋权。分析使用了一个概念化的妇女赋权框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice is an interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed journal on extensive livestock production systems throughout the world. Pastoralists rely on rangelands and livestock for their livelihoods, but exhibit different levels of mobility and market involvement, and operate under a variety of different land tenure regimes. Pastoralism publishes research that influences public policy, to improve the welfare of these people and better conserve the environments in which they live. The journal investigates pastoralism from a variety of disciplinary perspectives across the biophysical, social and economic sciences. This is not applied research in the traditional sense, but relevant research, sometimes even basic research, with the capacity ultimately to change the way practical people do business. Predicting what kind of research will fulfil this role is virtually impossible. What we can do is keep policy makers, practitioners and pastoralists talking to scientists and researchers and aware of each others'' concerns.
期刊最新文献
Benefits, concerns and prospects of using goat manure in sub-Saharan Africa A microregional reindeer herding landscape in Yamal: patterns and dynamics of movements Adaptive pastoralists—Insights into local and regional patterns in livelihood adaptation choices among pastoralists in Kenya Tracking free-ranging sheep to evaluate interrelations between selective grazing, movement patterns and the botanical composition of alpine summer pastures in northern Italy Correction: One health insights into pastoralists’ perceptions on zoonotic diseases in Ethiopia: perspectives from South Omo Zone of SNNP Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1