Critical digital literacies at school level: A systematic review

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Education Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1002/rev3.3425
Liisa Ilomäki, Minna Lakkala, Veera Kallunki, Darren Mundy, Marc Romero, Teresa Romeu, Gouseti Anastasia
{"title":"Critical digital literacies at school level: A systematic review","authors":"Liisa Ilomäki, Minna Lakkala, Veera Kallunki, Darren Mundy, Marc Romero, Teresa Romeu, Gouseti Anastasia","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The rapid and ongoing technological developments and the changes in societal practices require us to update our understanding and skills relating to digital technology use continuously. Various frameworks have been created in recent years to explore the different aspects of digital literacies or digital competencies and a range of newer concepts and dimensions have emerged in the literature aiming to capture the complexity of digital engagement. The main aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to map out which elements or issues of critical digital literacies (CDL) relevant for school education currently feature in the academic literature and international policy documents. The secondary aim was to use the findings of the SLR to inform the creation of a research‐based framework for school education. The review process followed a systematic protocol for answering specific research questions. Research articles were sought in two electronic databases—EBSCO (Academic Search Complete) and Web of Science—and policy documents were sought on the Internet using Google search. A total of 139 research articles and policy‐related documents were used for the analysis. The main dimensions based on the analysis were the following (in the order of most hits): E‐safety, Participation and presence, Digital literacy, Media literacy, Digital citizenship, Technology literacy, Information literacy, Data literacy, Digital game literacy, Online learning, Digital creativity and innovation, and Digital well‐being. The emphasis in the research articles was on negative issues, although publications also outlined several positive issues about digitality. The emphases of the research articles and policy‐related documents differed somewhat. The findings of this SLR have implications for researchers, policy makers and educators interested in the changing nature of critical digital literacies and the dimensions and subdimensions relevant for school education. Context and implications Rationale for the study: This systematic literature review (SLR) identifies the key elements and issues of critical digital literacies (CDL) relevant to school education, as documented in academic literature and international policy documents. In addition, it utilises the findings of the SLR to develop a research‐based framework for CLD in school education. Why the new findings matter: Our findings contribute to capturing the different aspects of CDL in the context of compulsory education and offer original insights with regard to supporting the development of teachers and students' critical digital literacies in the future. Implications for researchers, practitioners and policy makers: This SLR has implications for research as it has highlighted the need to continuously update theoretical models and frameworks relating to CDL. Although certain accepted core dimensions can provide a stable foundation for representing emerging phenomena, it is essential to maintain flexibility to address the technological advancements. An implication for policy making is the recognition of the need for continuous professional development and pedagogical support for teachers and students. The value for educational practitioners is that it elucidates the emerging notions of CDL, and it enables educational institutions to enhance their practices and initiatives related to CDL.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The rapid and ongoing technological developments and the changes in societal practices require us to update our understanding and skills relating to digital technology use continuously. Various frameworks have been created in recent years to explore the different aspects of digital literacies or digital competencies and a range of newer concepts and dimensions have emerged in the literature aiming to capture the complexity of digital engagement. The main aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to map out which elements or issues of critical digital literacies (CDL) relevant for school education currently feature in the academic literature and international policy documents. The secondary aim was to use the findings of the SLR to inform the creation of a research‐based framework for school education. The review process followed a systematic protocol for answering specific research questions. Research articles were sought in two electronic databases—EBSCO (Academic Search Complete) and Web of Science—and policy documents were sought on the Internet using Google search. A total of 139 research articles and policy‐related documents were used for the analysis. The main dimensions based on the analysis were the following (in the order of most hits): E‐safety, Participation and presence, Digital literacy, Media literacy, Digital citizenship, Technology literacy, Information literacy, Data literacy, Digital game literacy, Online learning, Digital creativity and innovation, and Digital well‐being. The emphasis in the research articles was on negative issues, although publications also outlined several positive issues about digitality. The emphases of the research articles and policy‐related documents differed somewhat. The findings of this SLR have implications for researchers, policy makers and educators interested in the changing nature of critical digital literacies and the dimensions and subdimensions relevant for school education. Context and implications Rationale for the study: This systematic literature review (SLR) identifies the key elements and issues of critical digital literacies (CDL) relevant to school education, as documented in academic literature and international policy documents. In addition, it utilises the findings of the SLR to develop a research‐based framework for CLD in school education. Why the new findings matter: Our findings contribute to capturing the different aspects of CDL in the context of compulsory education and offer original insights with regard to supporting the development of teachers and students' critical digital literacies in the future. Implications for researchers, practitioners and policy makers: This SLR has implications for research as it has highlighted the need to continuously update theoretical models and frameworks relating to CDL. Although certain accepted core dimensions can provide a stable foundation for representing emerging phenomena, it is essential to maintain flexibility to address the technological advancements. An implication for policy making is the recognition of the need for continuous professional development and pedagogical support for teachers and students. The value for educational practitioners is that it elucidates the emerging notions of CDL, and it enables educational institutions to enhance their practices and initiatives related to CDL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关键数字素养在学校水平:一个系统的审查
快速和持续的技术发展和社会实践的变化要求我们不断更新我们对数字技术使用的理解和技能。近年来,人们创建了各种框架来探索数字素养或数字能力的不同方面,并在文献中出现了一系列新的概念和维度,旨在捕捉数字参与的复杂性。本系统文献综述(SLR)的主要目的是绘制出当前学术文献和国际政策文件中与学校教育相关的关键数字素养(CDL)的哪些要素或问题。第二个目的是利用SLR的研究结果,为学校教育基于研究的框架的创建提供信息。审查过程遵循回答特定研究问题的系统方案。研究论文在ebsco(学术检索完整)和Web of science两个电子数据库中搜索,政策文件在互联网上使用Google搜索进行搜索。共有139篇研究论文和政策相关文件被用于分析。基于分析的主要维度如下(按点击次数最多的顺序):电子安全、参与和存在、数字素养、媒体素养、数字公民、技术素养、信息素养、数据素养、数字游戏素养、在线学习、数字创造力和创新以及数字福祉。研究文章的重点是负面问题,尽管出版物也概述了数字化的几个积极问题。研究文章和政策相关文件的侧重点有所不同。SLR的研究结果对研究关键数字素养的变化性质以及与学校教育相关的维度和子维度的研究人员、政策制定者和教育工作者具有启示意义。背景和含义研究的基本原理:本系统性文献综述(SLR)确定了学术文献和国际政策文件中记载的与学校教育相关的关键因素和关键数字素养(CDL)问题。此外,它利用SLR的研究结果为学校教育中的CLD开发了一个基于研究的框架。新发现的重要性:我们的发现有助于捕捉义务教育背景下CDL的不同方面,并为未来支持教师和学生批判性数字素养的发展提供了原创性见解。对研究人员、从业人员和政策制定者的启示:这一单反对研究具有启示意义,因为它强调了不断更新与CDL相关的理论模型和框架的必要性。尽管某些公认的核心维度可以为表示新兴现象提供稳定的基础,但保持灵活性以应对技术进步是至关重要的。对政策制定的影响是认识到需要持续的专业发展和对教师和学生的教学支持。教育从业者的价值在于,它阐明了CDL的新兴概念,并使教育机构能够加强与CDL相关的实践和倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Education
Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
The status of culturally relevant teacher education in the European context: A systematic review of research Effectiveness of language‐sensitive subject teaching: Heterogeneity and quality of the evidence and implications for future research Evaluation of the effectiveness of critical thinking training on critical thinking skills and academic achievement by using mixed‐meta method Research on teachers of colour and minoritised teachers in majoritarian education systems: A scoping review of the literature in the last two decades Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1