Adapting Economic Evaluation Methods to Shifting Global Health Priorities: Assessing the Value of Health System Inputs

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Value in health regional issues Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2023.08.005
Finn McGuire PhD , Sakshi Mohan MSc , Simon Walker PhD , Juliet Nabyonga-Orem PhD , Freddie Ssengooba PhD , Edward Kataika PhD , Paul Revill PhD
{"title":"Adapting Economic Evaluation Methods to Shifting Global Health Priorities: Assessing the Value of Health System Inputs","authors":"Finn McGuire PhD ,&nbsp;Sakshi Mohan MSc ,&nbsp;Simon Walker PhD ,&nbsp;Juliet Nabyonga-Orem PhD ,&nbsp;Freddie Ssengooba PhD ,&nbsp;Edward Kataika PhD ,&nbsp;Paul Revill PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2023.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We highlight the importance of undertaking value assessments for health system inputs if allocative efficiency is to be achieve with health sector resources, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. However, methodological challenges complicated the application of current economic evaluation techniques to health system input investments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We undertake a review of the literature to examine how assessments of investments in health system inputs have been considered to date, highlighting several studies that have suggested ways to address the methodological issues. Additionally, we surveyed how empirical economic evaluations of health system inputs have approached these issues. Finally, we highlight the steps required to move toward a comprehensive standardized framework for undertaking economic evaluations to make value assessments for investments in health systems.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Although the methodological challenges have been illustrated, a comprehensive framework for value assessments of health system inputs, guiding the evidence required, does not exist. The applied literature of economic evaluations of health system inputs has largely ignored the issues, likely resulting in inaccurate assessments of cost-effectiveness.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A majority of health sector budgets are spent on health system inputs, facilitating the provision of healthcare interventions. Although economic evaluation methods are a key component in priority setting for healthcare interventions, such methods are less commonly applied to decision making for investments in health system inputs. Given the growing agenda for investments in health systems, a framework will be increasingly required to guide governments and development partners in prioritizing investments in scarce health sector budgets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923000821/pdfft?md5=a672303c84fb984f68c54fdd71858f5f&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109923000821-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923000821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

We highlight the importance of undertaking value assessments for health system inputs if allocative efficiency is to be achieve with health sector resources, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. However, methodological challenges complicated the application of current economic evaluation techniques to health system input investments.

Methods

We undertake a review of the literature to examine how assessments of investments in health system inputs have been considered to date, highlighting several studies that have suggested ways to address the methodological issues. Additionally, we surveyed how empirical economic evaluations of health system inputs have approached these issues. Finally, we highlight the steps required to move toward a comprehensive standardized framework for undertaking economic evaluations to make value assessments for investments in health systems.

Results

Although the methodological challenges have been illustrated, a comprehensive framework for value assessments of health system inputs, guiding the evidence required, does not exist. The applied literature of economic evaluations of health system inputs has largely ignored the issues, likely resulting in inaccurate assessments of cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions

A majority of health sector budgets are spent on health system inputs, facilitating the provision of healthcare interventions. Although economic evaluation methods are a key component in priority setting for healthcare interventions, such methods are less commonly applied to decision making for investments in health system inputs. Given the growing agenda for investments in health systems, a framework will be increasingly required to guide governments and development partners in prioritizing investments in scarce health sector budgets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调整经济评估方法以适应不断变化的全球卫生重点:评估卫生系统投入的价值。
目标:我们强调,如果要实现卫生部门资源的分配效率,就必须对卫生系统投入进行价值评估,重点是低收入和中等收入国家。然而,方法上的挑战使当前经济评价技术应用于卫生系统投入投资变得复杂。方法:我们对文献进行了回顾,以检查迄今为止如何考虑对卫生系统投入的投资进行评估,重点介绍了几项研究,这些研究提出了解决方法问题的方法。此外,我们调查了卫生系统投入的实证经济评估如何处理这些问题。最后,我们强调需要采取的步骤,以建立一个全面的标准化框架,进行经济评估,对卫生系统的投资进行价值评估。结果:虽然方法上的挑战已经说明,但并不存在一个全面的卫生系统投入价值评估框架,指导所需的证据。对卫生系统投入进行经济评价的应用文献在很大程度上忽略了这些问题,可能导致对成本效益的评估不准确。结论:卫生部门预算的大部分用于卫生系统投入,促进了卫生保健干预措施的提供。虽然经济评价方法是确定卫生保健干预措施优先事项的关键组成部分,但这种方法较少应用于卫生系统投入投资的决策。鉴于对卫生系统投资的议程越来越多,将越来越需要一个框架来指导政府和发展伙伴对稀缺的卫生部门预算进行优先投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
Understanding What Matters: Stakeholder Views on Decision Criteria for Cancer Drug Selection in the Public Sector in Malaysia. Postpartum Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Singapore Cost-Utility Analysis of Dose-Dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in Comparison With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in the Treatment of Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Iran. Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1