The impact of sleep apnea on primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-23 DOI:10.1177/17585732221089262
Nicolás Valentino, Kevin Moattari, Adam M Gordon, Asad M Ashraf, Ramin Sadeghpour, Afshin E Razi
{"title":"The impact of sleep apnea on primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis.","authors":"Nicolás Valentino, Kevin Moattari, Adam M Gordon, Asad M Ashraf, Ramin Sadeghpour, Afshin E Razi","doi":"10.1177/17585732221089262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As the prevalence of sleep apnea (SA) increases nationwide, large sample sized studies following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in SA patients are scarce. Therefore, this study evaluated whether SA is associated with 1) longer in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS) 2) readmissions 3) medical complications and 4) costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective nationwide Medicare analysis from 2005 to 2014 was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients with SA undergoing RSA for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Study group patients were 1:5 ratio matched to controls yielding 6241 patients in the study and 31,179 in the comparison cohort. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds-ratios (OR) for readmissions and complications. A <i>p-</i>value less than 0.004 was significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SA patients had significantly longer in-hospital LOS compared to their counterparts (3-days versus 2-days, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.0001), but similar rates of 90-day readmissions (7.98% vs. 6.54%; OR: 1.00, <i>p</i> <i>=</i> 0.907). Patients with SA had significantly greater incidence and odds of 90-day medical complications (13.36% vs. 7.29%; OR: 1.42, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.0001) and significantly higher 90-day costs ($16,529.16 vs. $14,789.15, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with SA undergoing primary RSA for the treatment of glenohumeral OA have longer in-hospital LOS, increased medical complications, and costs of care. Readmissions were not more common.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"15 3 Suppl","pages":"54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732221089262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As the prevalence of sleep apnea (SA) increases nationwide, large sample sized studies following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in SA patients are scarce. Therefore, this study evaluated whether SA is associated with 1) longer in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS) 2) readmissions 3) medical complications and 4) costs.

Methods: A retrospective nationwide Medicare analysis from 2005 to 2014 was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients with SA undergoing RSA for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Study group patients were 1:5 ratio matched to controls yielding 6241 patients in the study and 31,179 in the comparison cohort. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds-ratios (OR) for readmissions and complications. A p-value less than 0.004 was significant.

Results: SA patients had significantly longer in-hospital LOS compared to their counterparts (3-days versus 2-days, p< 0.0001), but similar rates of 90-day readmissions (7.98% vs. 6.54%; OR: 1.00, p= 0.907). Patients with SA had significantly greater incidence and odds of 90-day medical complications (13.36% vs. 7.29%; OR: 1.42, p< 0.0001) and significantly higher 90-day costs ($16,529.16 vs. $14,789.15, p< 0.0001).

Conclusion: Patients with SA undergoing primary RSA for the treatment of glenohumeral OA have longer in-hospital LOS, increased medical complications, and costs of care. Readmissions were not more common.

Level of evidence: III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睡眠呼吸暂停对原发性肩关节置换治疗肩关节骨性关节炎的影响。
导论:随着睡眠呼吸暂停(SA)的患病率在全国范围内的增加,对SA患者进行原发性反向肩关节置换术(RSA)后的大样本研究很少。因此,本研究评估了SA是否与1)更长的住院时间(LOS)、2)再入院率、3)医疗并发症和4)费用相关。方法:对2005 - 2014年全国医疗保险情况进行回顾性分析。纳入标准为SA患者行RSA治疗肩关节骨性关节炎。研究组患者与对照组的比例为1:5,研究中有6241例患者,比较队列中有31,179例患者。采用Logistic回归计算再入院和并发症的比值比(OR)。p值小于0.004为显著性。结果:与对照组相比,SA患者的住院时间明显更长(3天对2天,p 0.0001),但90天再入院率相似(7.98%对6.54%;OR: 1.00, p = 0.907)。SA患者90天内医学并发症的发生率和几率显著高于SA患者(13.36% vs. 7.29%;OR: 1.42, p 0.0001), 90天的成本显著增加(16,529.16美元对14,789.15美元,p 0.0001)。结论:SA患者接受初级RSA治疗肩关节骨关节炎的住院时间更长,医疗并发症增加,护理费用增加。再入院并不常见。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint separations presenting to emergency departments in the United States between 2004 and 2023. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bioinductive patch achieves equivalent patient-reported outcomes and retear rate at 1 year. Patterns of management for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A comparative study of open and arthroscopic approaches. Stress shielding influences shoulder function after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a short stem at minimum 2 years follow-up and can be predicted using a preoperative planning software: A retrospective cohort study. Response to the Letter-to-the-Editor by Dr H Duansuperwong and Prof. V Wiwanitkit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1