How Safe Are the Laparoscopic and Robotic Graspers? Evaluation of the Novel Avatera Robotic Surgical System: An Acute In Vivo Study on a Porcine Model.

0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology research & practice Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.5152/tud.2023.23127
Vasileios Tatanis, Anastasios Natsos, Arman Tsaturyan, Athanasios Vagionis, Angelis Peteinaris, Solon Faitatziadis, Kristiana Gkeka, Konstantinos Pagonis, Mohammed Obaidat, Eirini Anaplioti, Dimitra Koumoundourou, Vassiliki Bravou, Theofanis Vrettos, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Evangelos Liatsikos
{"title":"How Safe Are the Laparoscopic and Robotic Graspers? Evaluation of the Novel Avatera Robotic Surgical System: An Acute In Vivo Study on a Porcine Model.","authors":"Vasileios Tatanis, Anastasios Natsos, Arman Tsaturyan, Athanasios Vagionis, Angelis Peteinaris, Solon Faitatziadis, Kristiana Gkeka, Konstantinos Pagonis, Mohammed Obaidat, Eirini Anaplioti, Dimitra Koumoundourou, Vassiliki Bravou, Theofanis Vrettos, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Evangelos Liatsikos","doi":"10.5152/tud.2023.23127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the tissue injury caused by the force applied by the roboticassisted graspers of avatera robotic surgical system on bowel tissue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experimental in vivo porcine model with 1 pig was conducted. After a standard transperitoneal setup of the avatera robotic surgical system, different laparoscopic and robotic graspers were used on the bowel with maximum force applied each time. Robotic atraumatic grasper, laparoscopic right angle grasper, laparoscopic curved grasper, and laparoscopic atraumatic grasper were used. After using all graspers, the pig was sacrificed. The bowel segments were resected and sent for histological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pathologist reported that all the graspers caused signs of acute inflammation without any irreversible damage or signs compatible with ischemia of the tissue. No significant difference in histology was observed between the graspers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No permanent damage was caused by graspers, except for acute, reversible inflammation. Concluding, the avatera grasper could be safe to use on bowel segments, independent of the applied pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":" ","pages":"387-391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10765195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.23127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the tissue injury caused by the force applied by the roboticassisted graspers of avatera robotic surgical system on bowel tissue.

Methods: An experimental in vivo porcine model with 1 pig was conducted. After a standard transperitoneal setup of the avatera robotic surgical system, different laparoscopic and robotic graspers were used on the bowel with maximum force applied each time. Robotic atraumatic grasper, laparoscopic right angle grasper, laparoscopic curved grasper, and laparoscopic atraumatic grasper were used. After using all graspers, the pig was sacrificed. The bowel segments were resected and sent for histological analysis.

Results: The pathologist reported that all the graspers caused signs of acute inflammation without any irreversible damage or signs compatible with ischemia of the tissue. No significant difference in histology was observed between the graspers.

Conclusion: No permanent damage was caused by graspers, except for acute, reversible inflammation. Concluding, the avatera grasper could be safe to use on bowel segments, independent of the applied pressure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜抓取器和机器人抓取器的安全性如何?新型Avatera机器人手术系统的评估:猪模型的急性体内研究。
目的:探讨avatera机器人手术系统中机器人辅助抓手对肠道组织的力损伤。方法:用1头猪建立猪体内实验模型。在avatera机器人手术系统的标准经腹膜设置后,每次使用不同的腹腔镜和机器人抓取器在肠道上施加最大的力。采用机器人无创抓取器、腹腔镜直角抓取器、腹腔镜弯曲抓取器和腹腔镜无创抓取器。用完所有的抓斗后,猪被献祭。切除肠段,送去做组织学分析。结果:病理学家报告,所有抓鼠均出现急性炎症征象,无不可逆损伤或与组织缺血相适应的征象。抓握者在组织学上无显著差异。结论:除急性可逆性炎症外,无永久性损伤。综上所述,avatera抓握器可以安全地用于肠段,而不依赖于施加的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Value of TGF-β Expression in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Reporting and Grading of Complications in Urological Surgery: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. "Minho Technique" for Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit. A New Sperm Concentration Threshold for Y Chromosome Microdeletion Analysis in Infertile Men: Could It Be Azoopermia? Hounsfield Unit on Preoperative Computed Tomography as an Indicator of Prognosis in Patients with Liposarcoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1