Invoking Identity? Partisan Polarization in Discussions of Race, Racism, and Gender in 2022 Midterm Advertising in the United States.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1215/03616878-11066296
Erika Franklin Fowler, Steven T Moore, Breeze Floyd, Jielu Yao, Markus Neumann, Neil A Lewis, Jeff Niederdeppe, Sarah E Gollust
{"title":"Invoking Identity? Partisan Polarization in Discussions of Race, Racism, and Gender in 2022 Midterm Advertising in the United States.","authors":"Erika Franklin Fowler, Steven T Moore, Breeze Floyd, Jielu Yao, Markus Neumann, Neil A Lewis, Jeff Niederdeppe, Sarah E Gollust","doi":"10.1215/03616878-11066296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Media messaging matters for public opinion and policy, and analyzing patterns of campaign strategy can provide important windows into policy priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors used content analysis supplemented with keyword-based text analysis to assess the volume, proportion, and distribution of media attention to race-related issues in comparison to gender-related issues during the general election period of the 2022 midterm campaigns for federal office in the United States.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Race-related mentions in campaign advertising were overwhelmingly focused on crime and law and order, with very little attention to racism, racial injustice, and the structural barriers that lead to widespread inequities. In stark contrast to mentions of gender, racial appeals were less identity focused and were competitively contested between the parties in their messaging, but they were much more likely to be led by Republicans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that discussions of race and gender were highly polarized, with consequences for public understanding of and belief in disparities and policies important to population health.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11066296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Media messaging matters for public opinion and policy, and analyzing patterns of campaign strategy can provide important windows into policy priorities.

Methods: The authors used content analysis supplemented with keyword-based text analysis to assess the volume, proportion, and distribution of media attention to race-related issues in comparison to gender-related issues during the general election period of the 2022 midterm campaigns for federal office in the United States.

Findings: Race-related mentions in campaign advertising were overwhelmingly focused on crime and law and order, with very little attention to racism, racial injustice, and the structural barriers that lead to widespread inequities. In stark contrast to mentions of gender, racial appeals were less identity focused and were competitively contested between the parties in their messaging, but they were much more likely to be led by Republicans.

Conclusions: The results suggest that discussions of race and gender were highly polarized, with consequences for public understanding of and belief in disparities and policies important to population health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调用身份?2022年美国中期广告中种族、种族主义和性别讨论中的党派分化
背景:媒体信息对公众舆论和政策很重要,分析竞选策略的模式可以为政策优先事项提供重要的窗口。方法:我们采用内容分析和基于关键词的文本分析相结合的方法,对2022年联邦公职中期选举期间种族相关问题的关注度、比例和分布进行评估,并与性别相关问题进行比较。调查结果:与种族相关的提及绝大多数集中在犯罪、法律和秩序上,很少关注种族主义、种族不公正以及导致普遍不平等的结构性障碍。与提到性别形成鲜明对比的是,种族诉求不太关注身份,两党在传递信息时也会相互竞争,但更有可能由共和党人主导。结论:我们的研究结果表明,关于种族和性别的讨论高度两极分化,这影响了公众对差异和对人口健康重要政策的理解和信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
期刊最新文献
Pandemic Times and Health Care Exclusion: Attitudes Toward Health Care Exclusion of Undocumented Immigrants. Political Partisanship, Confucian Collectivism, and Public Attitudes toward the Vaccination Policy in Taiwan. Regulating Abortion Later in Pregnancy: Fetal-Centric Laws and the Erasure of Women's Subjectivity. The Limits to Food and Beverage Industry Influence over Fiscal and Regulatory Policy in Latin America. Equity Investment in Physician Practices: What's All This Brouhaha?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1