Vanishing academics: On the importance of speed and becoming-imperceptible

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Inquiry Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1111/nin.12619
Pier-Luc Turcotte, Dave Holmes
{"title":"Vanishing academics: On the importance of speed and becoming-imperceptible","authors":"Pier-Luc Turcotte, Dave Holmes","doi":"10.1111/nin.12619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the influence of neoliberalism, academic work faces mounting pressure to align with imperatives of visibility and perceptibility. Traditionally criticised for working in isolated ‘ivory towers’, academics are now compelled to showcase the societal value of their work through performance metrics and evaluations. Paradoxically, these efforts have unintentionally led to the rigidification and commodification of academic work, stifling the production of knowledge beyond predefined parameters. In this paper, we contend that academics should resist the imposition of this neoliberal ‘grid’ and instead seek a path of ‘becoming-imperceptible’, drawing inspiration from the insights of Deleuze and Guattari. Becoming-imperceptible does not entail silent disengagement; rather, it represents a creative form of resistance challenging prevailing modes of assessment rooted in visibility and perceptibility. By incorporating the concept of ‘fast feminism’ to subvert Paul Virilio's hypermasculine speed theory, we uncover the transformative potential of temporary absences. Leveraging these moments of absence, academics can intensify their affective connections with both their peers and their work, making them undiscernible to the confines of the academic establishment. We argue that these instances of imperceptibility create fertile ground for creative and inventive academic endeavours on the margins of established boundaries, where original scholarship can flourish. Such a subversive approach is particularly relevant in fields like nursing and the health sciences, where it can challenge the dominant discourses that typify neoliberal academia.","PeriodicalId":49727,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Inquiry","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under the influence of neoliberalism, academic work faces mounting pressure to align with imperatives of visibility and perceptibility. Traditionally criticised for working in isolated ‘ivory towers’, academics are now compelled to showcase the societal value of their work through performance metrics and evaluations. Paradoxically, these efforts have unintentionally led to the rigidification and commodification of academic work, stifling the production of knowledge beyond predefined parameters. In this paper, we contend that academics should resist the imposition of this neoliberal ‘grid’ and instead seek a path of ‘becoming-imperceptible’, drawing inspiration from the insights of Deleuze and Guattari. Becoming-imperceptible does not entail silent disengagement; rather, it represents a creative form of resistance challenging prevailing modes of assessment rooted in visibility and perceptibility. By incorporating the concept of ‘fast feminism’ to subvert Paul Virilio's hypermasculine speed theory, we uncover the transformative potential of temporary absences. Leveraging these moments of absence, academics can intensify their affective connections with both their peers and their work, making them undiscernible to the confines of the academic establishment. We argue that these instances of imperceptibility create fertile ground for creative and inventive academic endeavours on the margins of established boundaries, where original scholarship can flourish. Such a subversive approach is particularly relevant in fields like nursing and the health sciences, where it can challenge the dominant discourses that typify neoliberal academia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消失的学者:论速度和变得不易察觉的重要性
在新自由主义的影响下,学术工作面临着越来越大的压力,必须与能见度和可感知性的要求保持一致。传统上,学术工作被批评为在与世隔绝的 "象牙塔 "里工作,如今,学术界不得不通过绩效指标和评估来展示其工作的社会价值。矛盾的是,这些努力无意中导致了学术工作的僵化和商品化,扼杀了超出预定参数的知识生产。在本文中,我们从德勒兹和瓜塔里的见解中汲取灵感,认为学术界应抵制这种新自由主义 "网格 "的强加,转而寻求一条 "变得不可感知 "的道路。变得不可感知 "并不意味着无声无息的脱离;相反,它代表了一种创造性的抵抗形式,挑战着植根于可见性和可感知性的主流评估模式。通过纳入 "快速女权主义 "的概念来颠覆保罗-维里略(Paul Virilio)的超男权速度理论,我们发现了暂时缺席的变革潜力。利用这些缺席的时刻,学者们可以加强他们与同行和工作之间的情感联系,使他们不被学术机构的束缚所辨识。我们认为,这些难以察觉的情况为在既定边界边缘开展创造性和发明性学术活动创造了沃土,使原创性学术得以蓬勃发展。这种颠覆性的方法与护理和健康科学等领域尤其相关,它可以挑战新自由主义学术界的主流话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Inquiry
Nursing Inquiry 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Inquiry aims to stimulate examination of nursing''s current and emerging practices, conditions and contexts within an expanding international community of ideas. The journal aspires to excite thinking and stimulate action toward a preferred future for health and healthcare by encouraging critical reflection and lively debate on matters affecting and influenced by nursing from a range of disciplinary angles, scientific perspectives, analytic approaches, social locations and philosophical positions.
期刊最新文献
Nurses' Advocacy in Intensive Care: What Insights Can Nurses' Experiences During the Pandemic Reveal? On Skin, Monsters and Boundaries: What The Silence of the Lambs can Teach Nurses About Abjection. The Everyday Phenomenology of Bedside Insight: A Response to Shira Birnbaum. Thinking Theoretically in Nursing Research-Positionality and Reflexivity in an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) Study. Health Professionals on Cross-Sectoral Collaboration Between Mental Health Hospitals and Municipalities: A Critical Discourse Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1