A competency framework on simulation modelling-supported decision-making for Master of Public Health graduates

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2023-12-08 DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdad248
Rok Hrzic, Maria Vitoria Cade, Brian Li Han Wong, Nicky McCreesh, Judit Simon, Katarzyna Czabanowska
{"title":"A competency framework on simulation modelling-supported decision-making for Master of Public Health graduates","authors":"Rok Hrzic, Maria Vitoria Cade, Brian Li Han Wong, Nicky McCreesh, Judit Simon, Katarzyna Czabanowska","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdad248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Simulation models are increasingly important for supporting decision-making in public health. However, due to lack of training, many public health professionals remain unfamiliar with constructing simulation models and using their outputs for decision-making. This study contributes to filling this gap by developing a competency framework on simulation model-supported decision-making targeting Master of Public Health education. Methods The study combined a literature review, a two-stage online Delphi survey and an online consensus workshop. A draft competency framework was developed based on 28 peer-reviewed publications. A two-stage online Delphi survey involving 15 experts was conducted to refine the framework. Finally, an online consensus workshop, including six experts, evaluated the competency framework and discussed its implementation. Results The competency framework identified 20 competencies related to stakeholder engagement, problem definition, evidence identification, participatory system mapping, model creation and calibration and the interpretation and dissemination of model results. The expert evaluation recommended differentiating professional profiles and levels of expertise and synergizing with existing course contents to support its implementation. Conclusions The competency framework developed in this study is instrumental to including simulation model-supported decision-making in public health training. Future research is required to differentiate expertise levels and develop implementation strategies.","PeriodicalId":16904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad248","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Simulation models are increasingly important for supporting decision-making in public health. However, due to lack of training, many public health professionals remain unfamiliar with constructing simulation models and using their outputs for decision-making. This study contributes to filling this gap by developing a competency framework on simulation model-supported decision-making targeting Master of Public Health education. Methods The study combined a literature review, a two-stage online Delphi survey and an online consensus workshop. A draft competency framework was developed based on 28 peer-reviewed publications. A two-stage online Delphi survey involving 15 experts was conducted to refine the framework. Finally, an online consensus workshop, including six experts, evaluated the competency framework and discussed its implementation. Results The competency framework identified 20 competencies related to stakeholder engagement, problem definition, evidence identification, participatory system mapping, model creation and calibration and the interpretation and dissemination of model results. The expert evaluation recommended differentiating professional profiles and levels of expertise and synergizing with existing course contents to support its implementation. Conclusions The competency framework developed in this study is instrumental to including simulation model-supported decision-making in public health training. Future research is required to differentiate expertise levels and develop implementation strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共卫生硕士毕业生模拟建模辅助决策能力框架
背景 模拟模型在支持公共卫生决策方面越来越重要。然而,由于缺乏培训,许多公共卫生专业人员仍然不熟悉如何构建仿真模型并将其输出结果用于决策。本研究通过制定针对公共卫生硕士教育的仿真模型辅助决策能力框架来填补这一空白。方法 该研究结合了文献综述、两阶段在线德尔菲调查和在线共识研讨会。根据 28 篇经同行评审的出版物,制定了能力框架草案。为完善该框架,进行了分两个阶段的德尔菲在线调查,共有 15 位专家参与。最后,包括六位专家在内的在线共识研讨会对能力框架进行了评估,并讨论了其实施问题。结果 能力框架确定了与利益相关者参与、问题定义、证据识别、参与式系统绘图、模型创建和校准以及模型结果解释和传播有关的 20 项能力。专家评估建议区分专业概况和专业知识水平,并与现有课程内容协同配合,以支持其实施。结论 本研究制定的能力框架有助于将模拟模型支持的决策纳入公共卫生培训。未来的研究需要区分专业水平并制定实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health
Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Previous Title Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Previous Print ISSN 0943-1853, Previous Online ISSN 1613-2238. The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice is an interdisciplinary publication for the discussion and debate of international public health issues, with a focus on European affairs. It describes the social and individual factors determining the basic conditions of public health, analyzing causal interrelations, and offering a scientifically sound rationale for personal, social and political measures of intervention. Coverage includes contributions from epidemiology, health economics, environmental health, management, social sciences, ethics, and law. ISSN: 2198-1833 (Print) 1613-2238 (Online)
期刊最新文献
How does health visiting in the first year of life vary by family characteristics? A longitudinal analysis of administrative data The correlates of environmental initiatives in sports organizations with climate change attitudes and subjective well-being Enhancing vitamin D levels in care homes: the role of healthy building design in preventing respiratory infections ‘Sleeping with the enemy’: a cross-sectional study on psychological and emotional violence among couples living in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic Association between neonatal mortality and births not weighed among 400 thousand institutional deliveries in 32 low- and middle-income countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1