What is the effect of sildenafil citrate intake on women undergoing assisted reproduction? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.4274/tjod.galenos.2023.59207
Saeed Baradwan, Mohammed Abuzaid, Majed Alshahrani, H. Sabban, W. Alkhamis, Ehab Badghish, Ammar Y. Alkhiary, I. Bukhari, Abdullah Alyousef, O. Alomar, A. Abu-Zaid
{"title":"What is the effect of sildenafil citrate intake on women undergoing assisted reproduction? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Saeed Baradwan, Mohammed Abuzaid, Majed Alshahrani, H. Sabban, W. Alkhamis, Ehab Badghish, Ammar Y. Alkhiary, I. Bukhari, Abdullah Alyousef, O. Alomar, A. Abu-Zaid","doi":"10.4274/tjod.galenos.2023.59207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have become a vital option for women facing fertility challenges. One of the potential interventions being explored is the use of sildenafil citrate (SC) to improve clinical outcomes in ART procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of SC on clinical outcomes in women undergoing ART. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search covered studies from inception until April 15, 2023, and identified relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for inclusion in the analysis. The endpoints were summarized as risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). After meticulous analysis, twenty-eight RCTs comprising 3,426 women were included in the study. The results revealed significant findings regarding the impact of SC on clinical pregnancy (CP) rates. Women receiving SC demonstrated a significantly higher probability of CP compared to the control group (n=21 RCTs, RR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.29, 1.59). Additionally, when SC was combined with other medications like clomiphene citrate (CC) or estradiol valerate, it further improved the likelihood of CP compared to these medications alone (RR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.53; RR=1.55, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.22, respectively). Furthermore, the study observed that the mean endometrial thickness (ET) was significantly higher in women who received SC compared to the control group, which involved other active interventions or placebo (SMD=0.77, 95% CI: 0.20, 1.34). Particularly, the administration of SC resulted in a notably higher ET level compared to the placebo (SMD: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.15, 2.51). The findings suggest that luteal supplementation of SC can be considered a beneficial approach to enhance ET and improve the CP rate in women undergoing ART.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2023.59207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have become a vital option for women facing fertility challenges. One of the potential interventions being explored is the use of sildenafil citrate (SC) to improve clinical outcomes in ART procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of SC on clinical outcomes in women undergoing ART. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search covered studies from inception until April 15, 2023, and identified relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for inclusion in the analysis. The endpoints were summarized as risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). After meticulous analysis, twenty-eight RCTs comprising 3,426 women were included in the study. The results revealed significant findings regarding the impact of SC on clinical pregnancy (CP) rates. Women receiving SC demonstrated a significantly higher probability of CP compared to the control group (n=21 RCTs, RR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.29, 1.59). Additionally, when SC was combined with other medications like clomiphene citrate (CC) or estradiol valerate, it further improved the likelihood of CP compared to these medications alone (RR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.53; RR=1.55, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.22, respectively). Furthermore, the study observed that the mean endometrial thickness (ET) was significantly higher in women who received SC compared to the control group, which involved other active interventions or placebo (SMD=0.77, 95% CI: 0.20, 1.34). Particularly, the administration of SC resulted in a notably higher ET level compared to the placebo (SMD: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.15, 2.51). The findings suggest that luteal supplementation of SC can be considered a beneficial approach to enhance ET and improve the CP rate in women undergoing ART.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摄入枸橼酸西地那非对接受辅助生殖的妇女有何影响?随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
辅助生殖技术(ART)已成为面临生育挑战的妇女的重要选择。正在探索的潜在干预措施之一是使用柠檬酸西地那非(SC)来改善抗逆转录病毒治疗程序的临床结果。本研究的目的是评估SC对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的妇女临床结果的影响。使用PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials等多个数据库进行了全面的文献检索。检索涵盖了从开始到2023年4月15日的研究,并确定了相关的随机对照试验(rct)纳入分析。终点总结为风险比(RR)或95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差(SMD)。经过细致的分析,28项随机对照试验包括3,426名妇女纳入研究。结果揭示了SC对临床妊娠率(CP)影响的重要发现。与对照组相比,接受SC的女性患CP的概率显著更高(n=21个rct, RR=1.43;95% ci: 1.29, 1.59)。此外,当SC与其他药物如柠檬酸克罗米芬(CC)或戊酸雌二醇联合使用时,与单独使用这些药物相比,它进一步提高了CP的可能性(RR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.53;RR=1.55, 95% CI分别为1.08,2.22)。此外,该研究还观察到,接受SC的女性的平均子宫内膜厚度(ET)明显高于对照组,对照组包括其他积极干预或安慰剂(SMD=0.77, 95% CI: 0.20, 1.34)。特别是,与安慰剂组相比,SC组的ET水平明显更高(SMD: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.15, 2.51)。研究结果表明,黄体补充SC可被认为是一种有益的方法,可提高接受ART的妇女的ET和CP率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Prevalence and predictors of hand hygiene compliance in clinical, surgical and intensive care unit wards: results of a second cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1